General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWhat does a conservative mean by the term "political correctness"?
My own observation, based on personal experience and reading here and elsewhere, is that when a conservative complains about political correctness, what the conservative is really saying is:
You are trying to limit my right to be an open racist/misogynist/general hater.
Trust Buster
(7,299 posts)Really?
Trust Buster
(7,299 posts)Cary
(11,746 posts)They are fascists. But we all know our enemy. We have them in focus. No need for definitions.
I saw a tweet by Ari Fleisher today saying he prefers Unindicted Co-Conspirator to Barack Obama and will vote for Unindicted Co-Conspirator in 2020. There are no conservatives. Conservatism is extinct.
Roy Rolling
(7,632 posts)You can be conservative or you can be a Republican, you can't be both. The tribe that self-names themselves as conservative are right-wing anarchists, wishing to destroy government.
After destroying democracy, they will be happy seeing corporations manage roads, bridges, and hospitals. Or, mis-manage them into bankruptcy as is the reality.
Cary
(11,746 posts)Their priority is racism.
guillaumeb
(42,649 posts)Or anyone who seeks to excuse hate speech by invoking the First Amendment.
mwooldri
(10,818 posts)They're fiscally irresponsible. Their economic policies are bonkers, not conservative. Their environmental policies sure aren't conserving anything and their social policies don't conserve much either.
Today's conservative is more likely to be a Democrat.
Trust Buster
(7,299 posts)dchill
(42,660 posts)and power, and the wealth and power of their benefactors, foreign and domestic. But they are liberal, nay, downright SOCIALIST in their need to expand those two attributes.
Conservatism is dead - if it was ever legitimately alive.
Cary
(11,746 posts)guillaumeb
(42,649 posts)treestar
(82,383 posts)Intolerant for not respecting their different opinion
Cary
(11,746 posts)RainCaster
(13,712 posts)You are trying to limit my God-given right to offend your snowflake ass.
guillaumeb
(42,649 posts)ProudLib72
(17,984 posts)Another example of the RW coopting a term that has positive connotations and turning it into a term of derision.
guillaumeb
(42,649 posts)And they right attacks the idea of social justice, unless it is for white Americans.
ProudLib72
(17,984 posts)They couch their complaints in very different terms. The major example that springs to mind is "War on Christianity". Notice that the term does not allow for civil dialogue. One can say, "The politically correct term is ____". Although this statement carries a certain sense of shame for using a politically incorrect term, it does not imply that the person being told what is correct is an enemy. Rather, it is a way of saying, "This is what our society now considers to be acceptable and neutral". Their terminology, however, always pits themselves against a perceived enemy, an existential threat. This is why I believe there is no way to carry on a dialogue with them. They do not want dialogue; they want us to conform to their standards.
guillaumeb
(42,649 posts)to convince their fellow conservatives that they are the ones being attacked.
To this day, I haven't quite grasped why social justice warrior is used as an insult. Whatever you do, the worst one can accuse you of is your attempt to contribute to a better world. You are attacking someone who stands in opposition to bigots and racists. I don't get it.
marybourg
(13,640 posts)and what they're making fun of is civility to others.
guillaumeb
(42,649 posts)Conservatives on the 1960's generally were open to dialogue.
librechik
(30,957 posts)Just because they use the n word doesn't make them a racist, and so on.
guillaumeb
(42,649 posts)The right to abuse others, and when confronted, to claim that they are the true victims.
DonViejo
(60,536 posts)Simple, "we get to say and do anything we want anytime we want; now, sit down and shut up. To the victor go the spoils."
guillaumeb
(42,649 posts)does not believe in a multi-party system.
NightWatcher
(39,376 posts)guillaumeb
(42,649 posts)When the Tea Party crowd talked about taking back the country, they meant to 1860.
Initech
(108,783 posts)With no one to shut them up or shut them down.
guillaumeb
(42,649 posts)they reserve the right to speak freely to themselves.
Wounded Bear
(64,324 posts)they staunchly defend their right to be an asshole and treat others like shit.
guillaumeb
(42,649 posts)Garrett78
(10,721 posts)guillaumeb
(42,649 posts)MrScorpio
(73,772 posts)It speaks to their inability to behave in mixed company.
guillaumeb
(42,649 posts)That, and their unwillingness to behave.
sharedvalues
(6,916 posts)And remember Fox and Limbaugh have amplified it on purpose because it helps their party get votes from racists.
guillaumeb
(42,649 posts)And they have been since 1965.
sharedvalues
(6,916 posts)The GOP is controlled by billionaires. To get votes for their pro-billionaire policies, they have embraced lying and hate. They built a propaganda machine to amplify and justify racism. PC is just one part of those lies.
guillaumeb
(42,649 posts)and protest votes for vanity candidates, help the billionaires.
shanny
(6,709 posts)you have to treat someone you don't consider fully human with civility. "
some person I can't remember on twitter
guillaumeb
(42,649 posts)Treating others as equals.
ismnotwasm
(42,674 posts)..Without any repercussions whatsoever because I shouldnt have to feel uncomfortable
guillaumeb
(42,649 posts)And it is our duty to make them feel uncomfortable.
A local politician made some Islamophobic remarks. A number of area residents, myself included, are confronting her about these remarks at her public meetings.
She used the First Amendment defense, and when I mentioned that I was also invoking my First Amendment right to call her an Islamophobic hater, she was speechless.
Blue_true
(31,261 posts)They want to go back to when a man could press up against an unwilling woman or man and not lose his job. Or back to a time when a cop could kill a person and no investigation would be done.
To them any needed social progress is political correctness.
guillaumeb
(42,649 posts)cynatnite
(31,011 posts)samir.g
(836 posts)Volaris
(11,704 posts)It means I get socially reprimanded for acting like a dick to Other Humans in Public, and I don't like that.
My response is 'then maybe don't DO THAT. It's true it's not against the Law for you to say what you want, but it's ALSO true that the Law wasn't set up to protect you from the criticism of Other People. If you aren't gonna own it and accept the consequences that come with, then u prolly shouldn't do that, huh?'
demigoddess
(6,675 posts)paleotn
(22,218 posts)yonder
(10,293 posts)That's all PC is. It's good manners. Many of us remember the emphasis put on good manners as we were growing up. The golden rule. Somehow, the right co-opted the concept of good manners, added 4 more syllables and created a word they can use as a cudgel to bludgeon those they disagree with. It's another example of the red hats' need to tear down rather than build up.
There's no way they could disparagingly use "good manners" to belittle others and otherwise do what they do, but "political correctness" works.
The OP has got it right, IMO.
maxrandb
(17,427 posts)that you might have a speck of common decency.
paleotn
(22,218 posts)It's the freedom to be an outright ass in public, with no repercussions. To me, political correctness means not saying things that would embarrass my mother and embarrass me if she heard me say them. Some people just don't seem to have such scruples. Or much sense.
Power 2 the People
(2,437 posts)defacto7
(14,162 posts)So as usual they're just making it into whatever they want it to mean.
RhodeIslandOne
(5,042 posts)Lint Head
(15,064 posts)The Genealogist
(4,739 posts)In their idea of a perfect society, they could say any racist, homophobic, xenophobic, misogynistic thing they want without being called on it. They don't like being shamed or embarrassed when a decent person points out what ignorant asses they are. So, they whine about political correctness.
guillaumeb
(42,649 posts)Their idea seems to be the US as it existed in 1950 or so, where all of "those people" knew their place.
unblock
(56,198 posts)Political correctness isn't about banning bigotry or preventing bigotry, it's just about non-bigots expressing *their* opinion that bigotry is wrong.
By objecting to "political correctness", they are trying to tell non-bigots to shut up.
They're not fighting for the right to be bigots, they're fighting for the right to be bigots *without having to hear any opposing voices*.
ooky
(10,922 posts)they can be openly disrespectful and arrogant to those classes of people they hate.
Doodley
(11,913 posts)Muslims, immigrants and other minorities. The allowances can be in the form of not denigrating the minorities as the conservatives would like to, or not treating them as if they are sub-human. It is a powerful political construct that combines the conservative deep-rooted grievance concerning specific minorities and the grievance concerning liberals who want to not only welcome those minorities, but give them special treatment. To a liberal, I think it means treating those people with respect and as equals.
Aristus
(72,187 posts)They want to be able to express all of the ugly, vile, hateful thoughts in their little pinheads without getting called out on it.
guillaumeb
(42,649 posts)They want to speak in public as they speak in private, and they take offense when other people are offended.
TrishaJ
(884 posts)political correctness" argument as a reason to have voted for Donald Trump.
guillaumeb
(42,649 posts)The GOP depends on racism as a motivator and a source of division.