Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DemocracyMouse

(2,275 posts)
Wed Sep 26, 2018, 03:04 PM Sep 2018

Who should be fired at NPR?

Some editor at NPR has pushed through a false equivalency between "sexual assault" and the gang rape of scores of under age women through the use of alcohol and drugs. The former is terrible, but vague. The latter has placed Bill Cosby in prison.

Are we being numbed by National Public Radio (and its "squeaky clean" white fan base) into assuming that Kavanaugh, Judge and all their preppie high school thugs are NOT going to prison?

They should say "the accusations of gang rape" not "the sexual assault allegations."

If Kavanaugh and Judge were working class African Americans Fox News would be calling the accusation full on gang rape.

I'm sick to my stomach and getting nothing done.

19 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Who should be fired at NPR? (Original Post) DemocracyMouse Sep 2018 OP
+1 RGinNJ Sep 2018 #1
And while we're being distracted by this monstrous display of preppie power DemocracyMouse Sep 2018 #2
But the mischaracterization by NPR is still insidious! DemocracyMouse Sep 2018 #4
Post removed Post removed Sep 2018 #10
In clearly distracting YOU! But no worries. It's human nature my friend. DemocracyMouse Sep 2018 #12
NPR Nice Polite Republicans! red dog 1 Sep 2018 #3
Nice acronym! Haven't heard that one :-) DemocracyMouse Sep 2018 #6
Can't serve the truth if you are walking on eggshells. Anon-C Sep 2018 #5
they've become an embarrassment of false equivalency over recent years. NRaleighLiberal Sep 2018 #7
Yep, like a "Morning Edition" host characterizing Rachel Maddow as a liberal version of Hannity. JaneQPublic Sep 2018 #11
Try driving cross country without NPR Awsi Dooger Sep 2018 #8
We now just do Pandora and music. I can no longer listen. NRaleighLiberal Sep 2018 #13
Try improving it. Try improving all our institutions DemocracyMouse Sep 2018 #14
I agree. Plus the critics of NPR assume all us listeners are too stupid to Hoyt Sep 2018 #16
It reminds me of the criticism of CNN Awsi Dooger Sep 2018 #18
I used to be a pretty avid listener of NPR Proud Liberal Dem Sep 2018 #19
I love, LOVE how this sick ass behavior of Kavanaugh, and friends, is written off as youthful Afromania Sep 2018 #9
I so, so very much hear where you're coming from DemocracyMouse Sep 2018 #15
I've given up on NPR. llmart Sep 2018 #17

Response to DemocracyMouse (Reply #2)

DemocracyMouse

(2,275 posts)
12. In clearly distracting YOU! But no worries. It's human nature my friend.
Wed Sep 26, 2018, 03:33 PM
Sep 2018

(And I, for one, don't read about human nature in self-help books)

red dog 1

(27,767 posts)
3. NPR Nice Polite Republicans!
Wed Sep 26, 2018, 03:10 PM
Sep 2018

The term "Gang Rape" is not in their lexicon.
(unless it's a gang rape charge against a Democrat)

DemocracyMouse

(2,275 posts)
6. Nice acronym! Haven't heard that one :-)
Wed Sep 26, 2018, 03:14 PM
Sep 2018

(...but I'm still vomiting in the face of NPR's cowardly and grossly inaccurate language!)

NRaleighLiberal

(60,006 posts)
7. they've become an embarrassment of false equivalency over recent years.
Wed Sep 26, 2018, 03:18 PM
Sep 2018

standing for anything means good for nothing.

JaneQPublic

(7,113 posts)
11. Yep, like a "Morning Edition" host characterizing Rachel Maddow as a liberal version of Hannity.
Wed Sep 26, 2018, 03:27 PM
Sep 2018

Thankfully, the guest pushed back.

 

Awsi Dooger

(14,565 posts)
8. Try driving cross country without NPR
Wed Sep 26, 2018, 03:19 PM
Sep 2018

You'll never criticize it again.

Otherwise the only choices are ultra right wing talk shows or country music

 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
16. I agree. Plus the critics of NPR assume all us listeners are too stupid to
Wed Sep 26, 2018, 03:43 PM
Sep 2018

ferret out facts. I think most listeners are perfectly capable of determining when the particular broadcast is too soft.

 

Awsi Dooger

(14,565 posts)
18. It reminds me of the criticism of CNN
Wed Sep 26, 2018, 04:06 PM
Sep 2018

NPR is fine. The complaints they receive are balanced between too far left and too far right, according to a letter I read from one of their higher ups, with slightly higher number of complaints about too far left.

I am happy the stations are always on the same range on the FM dial...normally between 89 and 92. I can find it quickly while on those long distance drives. I have another one coming up in three weeks. When one NPR station fades into the distance I look for the next one.

My only complaint is the frequency of repetition. I'll be on the road for 8-12 hours and the same programs show up multiple times.

BTW, NPR was an absolute life saver for me when I left on a long trip the day after the 2016 election. The ultra right wing programs on other radio networks were not only celebrating, they were proclaiming Trump's win as a gift from God.

Proud Liberal Dem

(24,392 posts)
19. I used to be a pretty avid listener of NPR
Wed Sep 26, 2018, 04:12 PM
Sep 2018

but as the early 00's went along, I noticed that they were stuck in the "both-siderism"/false equivalency muck, made even worse by Bush (mis-)Administration attacks on CPB/NPR. I still snatch an occasional podcast or two of 1A (the successor show to Diane Rehm's daily show) or Terry Gross' Fresh Air but I don't pay *as much* attention to the station as I used to. It's better than right-wing AM Radio to be sure. Just doesn't seem as enriching as it once used to.

Afromania

(2,768 posts)
9. I love, LOVE how this sick ass behavior of Kavanaugh, and friends, is written off as youthful
Wed Sep 26, 2018, 03:19 PM
Sep 2018

indiscretion where doing innocuous things as an AA teenager/pre teen, like walking along the street, is somehow worthy of prison/death. Trump wanted the central park 5 executed without concrete evidence (turns out they were innocent) and this fucker Cravenaugh is being vociferously defended by this dude.

The exact same people that are ok with the full on defense of this guy are the same ones that hate Kap for protesting, feel the police have carte blanche to shoot black folk and are 99.99999999999% trump voters with the other .00000000000001% being somebody too stupid to push the right button, and somehow voted a Sea Lion named Dave instead.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Who should be fired at NP...