General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsKavanaugh blurts out "the Swetnick thing is a JOKE"
Did anyone else see this as confession that Ford and Ramirez are telling the truth?
Roland99
(53,342 posts)dchill
(38,484 posts)Google the phrase "the Swetnick thing is a joke."
dchill
(38,484 posts)Matt Damon got nothing on HIM!
MaryMagdaline
(6,854 posts)MaryMagdaline
(6,854 posts)I almost fell out of my chair. Dumb criminal.
BumRushDaShow
(128,906 posts)when Feinstein begins the line of questioning that starts his outburst -
https://www.c-span.org/video/?451895-2/supreme-court-nominee-brett-kavanaugh-sexual-assault-hearing-judge-kavanaugh-testimony&playEvent
(I saw the other post with a clip included from a local news station too)
MaryMagdaline
(6,854 posts)MaryMagdaline
(6,854 posts)MountCleaners
(1,148 posts)Also, it's weird how he dances around criticizing Blasey Ford. It would make him look bad, but it's really fishy if you claim you're being persecuted by left-wing groups, etc. but you think someone assaulted her and you prayed for her. So transparently calculated. Staggering how credulous Republicans are that they believe this guy.
MaryMagdaline
(6,854 posts)Keep my composure to the senate panel but I wont overlook people lying about me. Ill pray for their jail sentence maybe, not for them. Unless, of course they are mentally il Then I could forgive.
That snippet, just placed there, all by itself is stunning.
Almost more stunning than watching the entire thing.. cause watching the entire thing, one gets... 'used' to his sick behavior....
MaryMagdaline
(6,854 posts)I think it stunned Feinstein as well
pangaia
(24,324 posts)WINNER !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
GAAAAZING !!!
MaryMagdaline
(6,854 posts)Kavanaugh failed.
pangaia
(24,324 posts)Which translated, is "NO mommy, I will NOT go to my room !!"
MaryMagdaline
(6,854 posts)peacebuzzard
(5,170 posts)This asshole is a great whiner
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)and more extreme, speaking as if gang rapes of girls were common at parties in that era, which seemed to have just gone on around and despite them.
The other two each speak very precisely of what they remember about the one incident they themselves experienced.
Not to say all three aren't true, just that I didn't take his statement on one as a betrayal of guilt for the others.
MaryMagdaline
(6,854 posts)Even more reason, I thought, that he would go after the two who specifically accused him and no one else. Why would Swetnick bother him more than the others? I would not overlook anyone lying about me very specifically just to attack someone with vague allegations against me.
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)accusations themselves. A number of witnesses from those days say they don't remember those parties that way. It's understandable. Who would want to be identified now as the kind of person who would repeatedly just ignore viciously violent and depraved crimes? Especially if you never saw any and don't believe those parts of her story.
MaryMagdaline
(6,854 posts)Might be plausible
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)The question here is what is the truth?
That creepy article casts him in a very bad light, I'd think bad enough for anyone, with a number of details reportedly corroborated by other witnesses.
We haven't heard of witness corroborations of Ms. Swetnick's story yet.
MaryMagdaline
(6,854 posts)babylonsister
(171,059 posts)if she wasn't believable.
Pachamama
(16,887 posts)Avenatti says she is completely credible
Rustynaerduwell
(663 posts)When my ex-wife denied the truth, she used obfuscation and diversion. She turned accusations around with her own accusations of being persecuted. She sounded angry and self- righteous but really not confident. But when her denials were justified, when she was speaking truthfully, she blurted out short statements of denial with a louder and more confident voice. It's hard to explain, but I could tell when she was lying when she "explained" more than she needed to, when she needlessly added minutiae. Her statements were unnecessarily complex. Her true statements were simple and direct. Yes, he lied about many things, but- whether it really is or not- he did believe "the Swetnick thing is a joke"
MaryMagdaline
(6,854 posts)I do believe he was telling the truth when he said Swetnick is a joke, ie he thinks he can easily beat that one. I think I would, if I were telling the truth, attack Ford and Ramirez. If he was told by his attorneys and handlers NOT to attack Ford and Ramirez, its because he and they believe those allegations.