HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » General Discussion (Forum) » How to Watch Julie Swetni...

Sun Sep 30, 2018, 08:40 PM

How to Watch Julie Swetnick Interview Online 8PM ET /PT tonight- please post if you are watching!

Please start a thread and post comments if you are watching!


https://heavy.com/entertainment/2018/09/watch-julie-swetnick-interview-online/

Julie Swetnick, the third woman to raise sexual misconduct allegations against Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh, will speak publicly Sunday night in an interview with John Heilemann on The Circus.

The interview will be part of a 30-minute episode, which airs Sunday, September 30, at 8 p.m. ET/PT and will be broadcast on Showtime. If you donít have cable or canít get to a TV, you can watch a live stream of the show (or DVR it, or watch it on-demand) on your computer, phone or streaming device by signing up for one of the following cable-free, live-TV streaming services.

27 replies, 2498 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 27 replies Author Time Post
Reply How to Watch Julie Swetnick Interview Online 8PM ET /PT tonight- please post if you are watching! (Original post)
Amaryllis Sep 2018 OP
procon Sep 2018 #1
Separation Sep 2018 #4
Amaryllis Sep 2018 #5
MountCleaners Sep 2018 #9
targetpractice Sep 2018 #2
jberryhill Sep 2018 #23
Hoyt Sep 2018 #3
Amaryllis Sep 2018 #6
Hoyt Sep 2018 #7
Amaryllis Sep 2018 #10
Trust Buster Oct 2018 #26
femmedem Sep 2018 #8
Amaryllis Sep 2018 #11
femmedem Sep 2018 #12
nocoincidences Sep 2018 #13
Amaryllis Sep 2018 #14
rzemanfl Sep 2018 #15
Amaryllis Sep 2018 #16
rzemanfl Sep 2018 #17
Amaryllis Sep 2018 #18
rzemanfl Sep 2018 #19
Amaryllis Sep 2018 #20
john657 Sep 2018 #24
rzemanfl Oct 2018 #25
redstateblues Sep 2018 #21
Amaryllis Sep 2018 #22
still_one Oct 2018 #27

Response to Amaryllis (Original post)

Sun Sep 30, 2018, 08:44 PM

1. Over hyped with maybe a minute interview on an airport concourse.

She said nothing new that hasn't been aired before.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to procon (Reply #1)

Sun Sep 30, 2018, 08:48 PM

4. Yup

I sure do bet that Amazon Prime and Showtime got a bunch of new signups though, so it was a win-win for them at least.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to procon (Reply #1)

Sun Sep 30, 2018, 08:48 PM

5. You mean that clip in the airpost that they were using as promo is the entire thing? SEriously?

This does nothing for either her or Avenatti's credibility. It weakens it seriously.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Amaryllis (Reply #5)

Sun Sep 30, 2018, 08:53 PM

9. Yeah, that was pretty much it

Big bunch of nothing. Avenatti said he was going to take it to the media...where is it??

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Amaryllis (Original post)

Sun Sep 30, 2018, 08:46 PM

2. I signed up for a Hulu Showtime trial just to watch...

Did I miss something? Because I watched the episode, and the interview was less than a minute while Swetnick and Avenatti were trying to catch a flight in an airport... I didn't hear or see anything we don't already know other than on camera face time for Swetnick. She seemed sincere and credible.

That said, I liked the episode and it was great to see Alex Wagner again.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to targetpractice (Reply #2)

Sun Sep 30, 2018, 11:17 PM

23. "Did I miss something?"

 


No. If it got you to sign up, you didn't miss a thing.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Amaryllis (Original post)

Sun Sep 30, 2018, 08:47 PM

3. Unless you got a kick out of Geraldo's Capone Vault, don't waste your time.

I saw better summaries on MSNBC Friday night. That is all this was, with a little screen time for Avenatti to tell us how great he is.

Ms. Swetnick answered 3 questions from earlier in week. Said pretty much what she stated in her statement. Nothing new.

Avenatti is playing this (go ahead and bash me). I was disappointed and think itís probably best if FBI does not interview her, because they might conclude it is questionable whether she has anything to add, which will taint Ms. Ford's and Rameriz's story. Possibly Avenatti told her to say nothing of substance, but why even agree to appear in that case.

Plus, the producers of the show and advertising must be the same group that worked with Geraldo on Caponeís vault.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Hoyt (Reply #3)

Sun Sep 30, 2018, 08:49 PM

6. Maybe the Dems were right that Avenatti is making it worse, not better.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Amaryllis (Reply #6)

Sun Sep 30, 2018, 08:51 PM

7. Just getting ready to add something like that. It didn't help and Showtime deserves criticism.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Hoyt (Reply #7)

Sun Sep 30, 2018, 08:54 PM

10. I have to say I kinda wondered why she chose Avenatti as her lawyer, compareed to the ones that

Ford chose. He's been great with Stormy but he is a grandstander.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Amaryllis (Reply #6)

Mon Oct 1, 2018, 10:03 AM

26. This

 

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Amaryllis (Original post)


Response to femmedem (Reply #8)

Sun Sep 30, 2018, 08:57 PM

11. THat clip has been up for several days and is the one they have beeen using for promo. Not new.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Amaryllis (Reply #11)

Sun Sep 30, 2018, 08:58 PM

12. Deleted. Thanks. n/t

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Amaryllis (Original post)

Sun Sep 30, 2018, 09:15 PM

13. I watched and there was NOTHING new.

No interview with Swetnick.

WTF

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to nocoincidences (Reply #13)

Sun Sep 30, 2018, 09:20 PM

14. Does not reflect well on Avenatti. Sure looks like bait and switch.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Amaryllis (Original post)

Sun Sep 30, 2018, 09:38 PM

15. Why doesn't anyone think Avenatti and his client are the ones who were had?

Let's watch the news in the coming week and see where this goes.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to rzemanfl (Reply #15)

Sun Sep 30, 2018, 09:53 PM

16. Good point! Thank you. We may have jumped to conclusions too quickly. There has certainly

been more than once where someone was scheduled for 60 Minutes and at the last minute was cancelled because it was too politically volatile. I personally know someone this happened to who was high up in politics. Then there was the movie called The Insider, about Jeffrey Wygant who was a whistleblower on the tobacco industry - true story- who was dropped from 60 Minutes at the last minute. RAchel had Avenatti o talking about this and I can't imagine she would not have vetted it carefully first, even tho she said NBC had not yet vetted it.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Amaryllis (Reply #16)

Sun Sep 30, 2018, 09:57 PM

17. I think they agreed to an "exclusive" and Avenatti thought "Showtime" was like MSNBC.

Premium channels are different. They ran with an airport interview, for whatever reason. Let's watch the news and see what happens.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to rzemanfl (Reply #17)

Sun Sep 30, 2018, 09:59 PM

18. I've been hoping Rachel or Lawrence might have her on tomorrow. I trust their vetting.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Amaryllis (Reply #18)

Sun Sep 30, 2018, 10:06 PM

19. There is also he fact that everything has been going a zillion miles an hour and in umpteen

directions at once. What may have looked smart on one day looks stupid the next. I am so sick of this shit show. I suspect the Statute of Limitation ran on everything that happened in Maryland when Kav was in high school. I can't get a clear answer to that from anyone. No one has directly said there was no Statute of Limitation on rape in Maryland in the early '80s. There was one on attempted rape then and it was only a year.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to rzemanfl (Reply #19)

Sun Sep 30, 2018, 10:08 PM

20. I've read a number of places that there isnt a statute of limitation on rape/sexual assault in MD

and I think heard it said on MSNBC but not sure; too much too fast like you said.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Amaryllis (Reply #20)

Sun Sep 30, 2018, 11:19 PM

24. Unless this allegation happened before 1992, then it was still

 

a misdemeanor in MD with a SoL of 1 year.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Amaryllis (Reply #20)

Mon Oct 1, 2018, 09:52 AM

25. Good morning. There isn't now but I haven't seen anyone say there wasnt't then.

I find it hard to believe that there was none in the '80s. If there was and has run the public is being played. MSNBC's legal analyst is one of the people who has said "no Statute of Limitation." This is remarkable legal laziness. There is a difference between "is" and "was." The U.S. Constitution prohibits ex post facto laws.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Amaryllis (Original post)

Sun Sep 30, 2018, 10:37 PM

21. Could't they get it on a major network?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to redstateblues (Reply #21)

Sun Sep 30, 2018, 10:42 PM

22. Doubt it. GAng rapes, etc. Would be much easier on cable. Also network is less willing to stick

their necks out.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Amaryllis (Original post)

Mon Oct 1, 2018, 10:08 AM

27. Sorry, but unless this is broadcast through a major network which everyone can access without

signing up for a subscription, it means very little


Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread