General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWhy there is NO WAY to Defend Kavanaugh's Demeanor
The claim is being made that Kavanaugh's belligerent and interrupting demeanor is "understandable" given the seriousness of the allegations and what he and his family are being "dragged through." This defense is absolutely unacceptable.
EVERY litigant, judge, lawyer, witness, Senate confirmee, and congressional witness, and yes even a defendant and a death penalty defendant, is required to comport themselves in a dignified, respectful and honest manner.
The seriousness of the charge is irrelevant, and if anything the seriousness of an allegation increases the demamds for proper temperament.
Kavanaugh disqualified himself simply by being disrespectful. Even if he hadn't been partisan, he disqualified himself, but his disrespectful belligerence falls below minimum standards for anyone in a courtroom or congressional process.
Indeed, the women who interrupted, got emotional and spoke their passionate opinions in earlier Kavanaugh hearings were ARRESTED and removed from the room, a fate they fully expected.
wcmagumba
(2,886 posts)saw the interview flake did earlier and he made that absurd talking point about kav...that he (flake) would
likely responded just like kav did facing those kind of accusations...what an effing farce...
olegramps
(8,200 posts)They made mincemeat out of him. I feel sorry for his kids and wife. He has been proven to be a sham, an imposture and hopeless wreak of a human being. His pose as a virgin choir boy without blemish has been exposed as a façade. He alone is responsible for his own undoing and the object of ridicule and derisive laughter.
dlk
(11,560 posts)Land Shark
(6,346 posts)... which FBI "comprehensive" investigation was, in the best case scenario, cut in half time-wise if we assume the FBI truly has a hands off investigation task for the few days left....
Siwsan
(26,260 posts)An angry, prevaricating bully with delusions of entitlement. Might explain the look on his wife's face, during his meltdown. She's seen it - lived it.
Land Shark
(6,346 posts)lunatica
(53,410 posts)I also think she was resigned to what he was going to do. And there was no indignation in her face. She looked defeated.
maddiemom
(5,106 posts)and seemed to be smiling or grimacing? She'd then look back upward with her face totally wiped of expression. It seemed to me that she did this fairly often.
Land Shark
(6,346 posts)goal is different from the emotion
TwistOneUp
(1,020 posts)Are very much like a job interview. When asked if they have ever passed out from drinking, if the applicant replies "Do You? Have you?", then the applicant FAILS the interview and does NOT get da job.
Why is this not being discussed? A blatant attempt to duck a question, and a completely unacceptable response.
malaise
(268,949 posts)That alone is enough- I would have chased his ass out of the room.
Land Shark
(6,346 posts)Lugnut
(9,791 posts)I was shocked to hear him attack Sen Klobuchar. Totally uncalled for and disrespectful.
Land Shark
(6,346 posts)malaise
(268,949 posts)that was why he picked him. Respect, decency and decorum be damned.
Land Shark
(6,346 posts)BigmanPigman
(51,585 posts)immediately at a job interview, any job interview.
Baitball Blogger
(46,700 posts)Land Shark
(6,346 posts)Last edited Mon Oct 1, 2018, 04:29 PM - Edit history (1)
lame54
(35,285 posts)would be held in contempt
Johonny
(20,836 posts)DFW
(54,360 posts)And Republicans found him "credible."
I guess that's why they don't vote at the Oscars.
Land Shark
(6,346 posts)Indeed, he clearly puts those on his side including himself in an impossibly positive light while demeaning and disparaging all those on the other side. In an important way, that is an exceptionally honest illustration of what he would do on the Supreme Court.
calimary
(81,220 posts)Sure fits that bastard!
DFW
(54,360 posts)Someone else came up with "Kavanaughty," but I thought that didn't really convey my true sentiments.
Land Shark
(6,346 posts)DFW
(54,360 posts)I've been using it since the guy's name (and background) came into the public light. Whether or not it really started with me, or whether it's a grand case of "Great Minds Think Alike," doesn't really matter, as long as the guy gets referred to as that by an ever increasing number of people.
LibDemAlways
(15,139 posts)you asking questions of a candidate at a job interview, would you hire someone who alternately cried, yelled, made unfounded paranoid comments, spoke repeatedly about liking beer, refused to answer questions, and turned questions back on you? The answer is obviously no.
I fully maintain that Kavanaugh could have shown the entire panel his middle finger, yelled "fuck you all," then grabbed and raped a woman then and there.....and the Repukes on the panel would still vote to confirm him with the explanation that the Democrats made him do it.
Land Shark
(6,346 posts)But if they knew they didn't have the votes their reaction would be a little different, and they would call it "unfortunate" that the judge "disrobed" without first getting a lockable bedroom.
Dave Starsky
(5,914 posts)He was clearly drunk at the time. No one would have ever hired him. He is a loser in denial.
But If he admitted his problem, told the panel (and the US) what was going on at the time, they might have given him a second chance.
LibDemAlways
(15,139 posts)think he could even think about coming before the judiciary committee under those circumstances unless he'd had a few. I was so disappointed no Democrat asked him when he'd had his last drink. He would have lied, but millions of eyes would have been instantly opened as to what was going on.
Land Shark
(6,346 posts)Hermit-The-Prog
(33,328 posts)Even if you ignore his histrionics (histrionic personality disorder?) and simply read a plain text transcript, you still wouldn't hire that beer junky!
Land Shark
(6,346 posts)issuesDemocrats
(91 posts)There's no defending him, period.
calimary
(81,220 posts)Sure looks that way to me, gotta say. He's not acting like an innocent man.
BootinUp
(47,141 posts)Land Shark
(6,346 posts)KY_EnviroGuy
(14,490 posts)I should also say Steven Miller's bullshit, too.
Add a shot of Jack in the cloakroom beforehand and that sums it up.....
pretzel4gore
(8,146 posts)Ad nazism.....there are so many of these evil stooges in usa ruling class maybe they're atypical. ...maybe they tell us our society is bankrupt, is in fact the enemy of hope life and decency. Maybe the death of humanity is actually a good thing if ridding the halls of power of them just too big a task(? )
Land Shark
(6,346 posts)JI7
(89,247 posts)for black and brown males including those who are underage.
they are the ones who are always demanding black people behave certain ways even when falsely accused of things.
hunter
(38,311 posts)Kavanaugh's demeanor is way out in the land of
It seems all that's left of the Republican Party is privileged white boys (and a few rare want-to-be privileged white boys), bullies especially, who rejected any and every opportunity they ever had to become grown up responsible adults.
marlakay
(11,451 posts)But when he questioned the two dem senators about their drinking, I thought obviously he thinks his employers for this job interview are the republicans only because no way would anyone behave like that questioning their boss in a rude obnoxious way and still expect to get the job.
world wide wally
(21,740 posts)Land Shark
(6,346 posts)Nitram
(22,791 posts)They have absolutely no decency. Kavanaugh's behavior was clearly disqualifying for a seat on ANY court. Rudely and angrily throwing questions back at the Democratic Senators? That would ruled Contempt of Court in any court in the land. I repeat. R$publicans have absolutely no decency.