General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsBanksy auction prank leaves art world in shreds
Girl With Balloon was the final item in an auction at Sothebys in London on Friday night and its sale price equalled the artists previous auction record of £1.04m.
However, shortly after the hammer came down on the item, the canvas suddenly passed through a shredder installed in the frame.
...
Sothebys said in a statement to the Financial Times: We have talked with the successful purchaser who was surprised by the story. We are in discussion about next steps.
https://www.theguardian.com/artanddesign/2018/oct/06/banksy-sothebys-auction-prank-leaves-art-world-in-shreds-girl-with-balloon
In the video at the link, it was half shredded, with the upper half still intact, so the rest hangs from that. If it remained like that, it's still displayable.
Dennis Donovan
(18,770 posts)I guess it could be pieced back together, but it's still artwork from Banksy (including the shredder-frame).
underpants
(182,861 posts)Hermit-The-Prog
(33,389 posts)Looks like active art to me.
KCDebbie
(664 posts)That it is half-shredded....
muriel_volestrangler
(101,347 posts)or they might like it as it is. We'll have to see. They might say they want it cheaper. After all, they might have bought it because they actually liked it, rather than wanting something controversial.
BumRushDaShow
(129,296 posts)I know-->
Donkees
(31,443 posts)lame54
(35,311 posts)MineralMan
(146,324 posts)me as though the shredded portion is not what was displayed above. I suspect that original artwork has rolled inside the frame, and a separate copy went through the shredder, fed from another roller.
The frame is deep enough to handle both paths just fine.
But the shredded part isn't the same material as the part within the frame. Clearly.
lame54
(35,311 posts)Either way it's pure Banksy and i would be proud to own it
MineralMan
(146,324 posts)I can just imagine the expressions on people's faces when it started whirring and the shredded portion appeared. A masterpiece of prankster performance art. And at a nice high price, too. I'll bet I'm right, though, and the original painting is intact, rolled up into the rear part of the frame box. We'll see. Maybe.
LisaL
(44,974 posts)and then it got shredded. Does the buyer still have to pay?
MineralMan
(146,324 posts)more now than before the auction. The art world is an interesting place. Banksey is known for doing odd things. That video of the end of the auction may well add considerable value to the work, which was not complete until what happened happened. Whatever happened. I still say we don't know for sure. Until the back of the box is opened, it will remain unclear, and we may not find out what is revealed.
The mystery and shock are clearly part of the overall art of this thing. Now, that's not my cup of tea, as a viewer of art, but I don't have a million dollars, either, to spend on a picture.
lame54
(35,311 posts)Seeing as who the artist is
muriel_volestrangler
(101,347 posts)since it's no longer flat. And it wouldn't have been hard to use the same material for both, so I wouldn't hang everything on this.
MineralMan
(146,324 posts)a bright, clean white. It's almost overstated, actually. The shredded portion is seriously yellowed, like old parchment. Now, if there were a strong heating element in the mechanism, along with the shredder blades, that effect could be realized, but not unless.
Those are, I'm almost 100% certain, two different materials. Looking at the boxed frame, I can see how I could build a double set of rollers in there to create the effect. No big deal, really.
The effect is the art. The painting, itself, isn't all that interesting, really, nor difficult to create. The illusion, on the other hand, is complicated and would have required some clever engineering. But, the two images are on different backgrounds, I'm certain.
Of course, the only way to be sure would be to remove the back of the box and peer inside.
muriel_volestrangler
(101,347 posts)I agree it's possible to have shredded a copy and hidden the original, but we can't tell from what we see.
MineralMan
(146,324 posts)The lower part is in the light. Not as bright a light as the image in the frame, but bright enough to display as white if it is white.
The difference in coloration is just too large. Bright white backgrounds do not look yellow at lower lighting levels. They are still white, but less bright.
blaze
(6,367 posts)MineralMan
(146,324 posts)frame, what was inside it was still bright white, while the shredded portion was yellowish. Different objects, I think. In a way, though, that's an even better prank.
LisaL
(44,974 posts)The color difference is most likely the light reflection through the glass and not.
MineralMan
(146,324 posts)Until the back of the frame box is removed, we won't know. And, since we don't own it, we can't do that. Stay tuned.
cbdo2007
(9,213 posts)On one hand THAT is a brilliant piece of performance art about consumerism and the high cost of art...on the other hand, that may have doubled or tripled the actual value of that piece and will certainly bring even more attention to future pieces he has up for auction.