General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsTrump threatens 'maximum penalties' for voter fraud
Trump threatens maximum penalties for voter fraudhttps://thehill.com/homenews/administration/412410-trump-threatens-maximum-penalties-for-voter-fraud
I guess I agree with the bastard about something.
There should be maximum penalties for voter fraud.
SMC22307
(8,090 posts)You do understand that, right?
Odoreida
(1,549 posts)SMC22307
(8,090 posts)That shit won't fly on DU.
handmade34
(24,054 posts)seriously?
bearsfootball516
(6,732 posts)But red states like to harp on it and try to use it as justification for extremely tight voter laws that make it hard for minorities to vote...even though there's no proof that fraud of any sort of significance is actually a thing.
dalton99a
(95,252 posts)Report: Trump commission did not find widespread voter fraud
By MARINA VILLENEUVE August 3, 2018
PORTLAND, Maine (AP) The now-disbanded voting integrity commission launched by the Trump administration uncovered no evidence to support claims of widespread voter fraud, according to an analysis of administration documents released Friday.
In a letter to Vice President Mike Pence and Kansas Secretary of State Kris Kobach, who are both Republicans and led the commission, Maine Secretary of State Matthew Dunlap said the documents show there was a pre-ordained outcome and that drafts of a commission report included a section on evidence of voter fraud that was glaringly empty.
Its calling into the darkness, looking for voter fraud, Dunlap, a Democrat, told The Associated Press. Theres no real evidence of it anywhere.
Republican President Donald Trump convened the commission to investigate the 2016 presidential election after making unsubstantiated claims that between 3 million and 5 million ballots were illegally cast. Critics, including Dunlap, reject his claims of widespread voter fraud.
LBM20
(1,580 posts)onecaliberal
(36,594 posts)slumcamper
(1,787 posts)Fraud against voters is most reprehensible.
Crutchez_CuiBono
(7,725 posts)or the gal they just indicted. Her name is so long I couldn't spell it if I could.
kacekwl
(9,264 posts)for vote tampering.
Initech
(109,263 posts)Odoreida
(1,549 posts)This will be the legal handle for attempts to invalidate Democratic Party victories in close races.
Liberal In Texas
(16,424 posts)BEFORE the election took place so he could set up an argument that Clinton wasn't a legitimate president when she won (as was expected...even by him.)
Kick in to the DU tip jar?
This week we're running a special pop-up mini fund drive. From Monday through Friday we're going ad-free for all registered members, and we're asking you to kick in to the DU tip jar to support the site and keep us financially healthy.
As a bonus, making a contribution will allow you to leave kudos for another DU member, and at the end of the week we'll recognize the DUers who you think make this community great.