Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsNew Hampshire court strikes down restrictive voter registration law aimed at college students:
Link to tweet
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 527 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (16)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
New Hampshire court strikes down restrictive voter registration law aimed at college students: (Original Post)
Gothmog
Oct 2018
OP
One victory at a time....
Gothmog
(145,168 posts)2. From my twitter feed
Link to tweet
Here is a link to the opinion https://big.assets.huffingtonpost.com/athena/files/2018/10/22/5bce0fade4b055bc94836c93.pdf
Gothmog
(145,168 posts)3. NH Judge Blocks GOP Voter Law With 'Misleading' Registration Forms
This is a major victory
https://talkingpointsmemo.com/muckraker/nh-judge-blocks-gop-voter-law-with-misleading-registration-forms
A New Hampshire judge blocked a controversial voter registration law in the state for the 2018 elections, in a preliminary Monday ruling that said that the burdens imposed by the law were unreasonable and discriminatory.
The law, passed by the Republican-controlled legislature in 2017, expanded the states domicile requirements and overhauled the language on the voter registration form in a way that Judge Kenneth Browne said was inherently confusing or misleading. The judge ruled that those challenging the law were likely to succeed on the merits to prove the new rules violated the states constitutional right to vote......
Judge Brown also brought up how extremely rare voter fraud is. He noted that in the very few instances of voter fraud convictions in the state in recent years, none had to do with abuse of the less complicated affidavit that voters had to sign attesting to they had domicile in the state before this new law went into effect.
Given the extraordinarily low rate of documented voter fraud in this state, it is far more likely that legitimate voters will be dissuaded from voting than illegitimate voters will be prevented, he said.
The law, passed by the Republican-controlled legislature in 2017, expanded the states domicile requirements and overhauled the language on the voter registration form in a way that Judge Kenneth Browne said was inherently confusing or misleading. The judge ruled that those challenging the law were likely to succeed on the merits to prove the new rules violated the states constitutional right to vote......
Judge Brown also brought up how extremely rare voter fraud is. He noted that in the very few instances of voter fraud convictions in the state in recent years, none had to do with abuse of the less complicated affidavit that voters had to sign attesting to they had domicile in the state before this new law went into effect.
Given the extraordinarily low rate of documented voter fraud in this state, it is far more likely that legitimate voters will be dissuaded from voting than illegitimate voters will be prevented, he said.
Cha
(297,187 posts)4. AWESOME!!