General Discussion

Odoreida

(1,549 posts) Thu Oct 25, 2018, 10:40 AM Oct 2018

So if the bombs are fake ...

It's still a threat of what may come after the election, right?

Spreading panic is also terrorism.

6 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

So if the bombs are fake ... (Original Post) Odoreida Oct 2018 OP

I am not hearing that the bombs are fake MontanaMama Oct 2018 #1

DU has become ground zero marybourg Oct 2018 #2

Thanks MontanaMama Oct 2018 #5

They are not fake, they may have been built in such an incompetent manner... Thomas Hurt Oct 2018 #3

Not fake. mn9driver Oct 2018 #4

Agree,saw the only Wellstone ruled Oct 2018 #6

MontanaMama

(24,722 posts)

1. I am not hearing that the bombs are fake

Reply to Odoreida (Original post)

Thu Oct 25, 2018, 10:44 AM

Oct 2018

from any reputable source.

marybourg

(13,640 posts)

2. DU has become ground zero

Reply to MontanaMama (Reply #1)

Thu Oct 25, 2018, 10:47 AM

Oct 2018

for reporting on rw conspiracy theories.

MontanaMama

(24,722 posts)

5. Thanks

Reply to marybourg (Reply #2)

Thu Oct 25, 2018, 10:54 AM

Oct 2018

for the reminder...ain’t it the truth? 🙄

Thomas Hurt

(13,982 posts)

3. They are not fake, they may have been built in such an incompetent manner...

Reply to Odoreida (Original post)

Thu Oct 25, 2018, 10:49 AM

Oct 2018

that they are duds, but I am hearing they had real explosives and glass shrapnel in them.

At least that is what I have gathered from my reading.

mn9driver

(4,848 posts)

4. Not fake.

Reply to Odoreida (Original post)

Thu Oct 25, 2018, 10:52 AM

Oct 2018

Just not fully functional due to either error or intent.

Wellstone ruled

(34,661 posts)

6. Agree,saw the only

Reply to mn9driver (Reply #4)

Thu Oct 25, 2018, 12:09 PM

Oct 2018

photo,looking at that device,a ton of work went into disguising the the tube part. The Arabic Script appears to be a distraction. Is this a 4Chan operation? Someone knows the Origin or has a solid idea,the Rethugs are all using the same 3 X5 card talking points.

Reply to this discussion