Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ProfessorPlum

(11,253 posts)
Mon Oct 29, 2018, 10:59 AM Oct 2018

Guns aren't shields

Everytime there is a shooting, we get the usual "more guns would have solved this problem". But guns don't shield people - they lead to, at best, an even larger hail of bullets.

This sounds so incredibly stupid to have to say. People need protection from guns. And guns don't provide that.

14 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

RainCaster

(10,834 posts)
1. We didn't cure polio by spreading the disease
Mon Oct 29, 2018, 11:02 AM
Oct 2018

That is what we expect to happen by adding more guns and hate.

Caliman73

(11,725 posts)
6. Actually, we didn't cure polio at all. We eradicated its spread.
Mon Oct 29, 2018, 11:37 AM
Oct 2018

And, we actually did it by spreading a dead version of the disease so that people's bodies could recognize and fight the disease without having to suffer its effects.

Totally get the arguments that guns are not a shield against other guns, but the polio thing is not analogous.

aikoaiko

(34,162 posts)
14. Technically, we did spread the poliovirus in vaccines.
Mon Oct 29, 2018, 03:35 PM
Oct 2018

Albeit inactivated versions of the virus.

You might want to rethink the analogy.

 

hexola

(4,835 posts)
2. The element of surprise is more powerful than the gun
Mon Oct 29, 2018, 11:05 AM
Oct 2018

Armed with the element of surprise - all armed defenders are at a disadvantage.

unblock

(52,116 posts)
3. guns are inherently offensive weapons, not defensive.
Mon Oct 29, 2018, 11:09 AM
Oct 2018

any defensive value comes from either
(a) stopping a threat by shooting them before they can shoot (more) people or
(b) stopping a threat by threatening to shoot them and they decide to not to shoot (more) people.

(b) doesn't work very well in mass shooting situations because in nearly all of these, the shooter has accepted that they probably will not come out of it alive anyway. they're not likely to stop just because they're threatened with a death they were planning on anyway.

(a) doesn't always work well because the shooter who planned the attack has a huge tactical advantage of having planned and prepared for it, whereas those shooting in defense are not prepared to die and are unsure how many shooters there are, what weapons they have, how much ammo, etc.
moreover, the shooter in at least some of these cases have *actual* defense in the form of bulletproof vests and such.


some of the actual building defenses i've seen in videos are cool -- for instance, in an emergency, walls can come down in a number of areas, making it hard for a shooter to advance from one area to the next.

 

pintobean

(18,101 posts)
5. Sometimes they are.
Mon Oct 29, 2018, 11:33 AM
Oct 2018
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/birmingham-mcdonalds-shooting-father-shoots-and-kills-masked-gunman-who-opened-fire-at-alabama-restaurant/

An father dining with his children at McDonald's in Birmingham, Alabama, fatally shot a masked man who entered the fast food restaurant and opened fire, CBS affiliate WIAT reports.

Birmingham Police responded to the McDonald's at around 10:45 p.m. Sunday after receiving reports that multiple people had been shot. When an employee opened the door to let a father and his two sons out of the restaurant, a masked man entered. The man then began shooting. Investigators say it is not clear whether he intended to rob the McDonald's or was targeting someone inside.

The father then opened fire on the gunman, fatally wounding him. The unidentified dad and one of his kids, a minor, were also struck, but do not have life-threatening injuries.

The investigation is still ongoing, but based on the preliminary information, the father won't face any charges, the station reports.

meow2u3

(24,759 posts)
7. This is definitely a case of justifiable homicide
Mon Oct 29, 2018, 11:44 AM
Oct 2018

The dad was trying to protect himself and his kids. Such proper uses of a gun are not as common as the NRA makes them out to be.

ProfessorPlum

(11,253 posts)
10. listen, of course
Mon Oct 29, 2018, 01:06 PM
Oct 2018

in these very very rare cases where the armed assailant is killed, that's a good thing.

Statistically though everyone would be so much safer if assailants had a long and difficult time arming themselves. That is a _real_ shield against bullets, and no one has to get shot even.

 

pintobean

(18,101 posts)
11. I live in one of the most dangerous cities in the country.
Mon Oct 29, 2018, 01:30 PM
Oct 2018

If we actually enforced the laws we have, and handed out real punishment for violators, we wouldn't live in such a dangerous society. Until that happens, many of us will be armed. We can't wait for an understaffed and underpaid PD to respond to a 911 call. And new useless and unenforced laws won't change that.

 

pintobean

(18,101 posts)
13. I don't live in fear
Mon Oct 29, 2018, 02:54 PM
Oct 2018

I live prepared, knowing the odds say I'm fairly safe.

You're right about that not always working, though. We just lost a retired cop to a robbery attempt this morning. They shot each other, the former cop died. The robber was arrested at the hospital.

https://www.stltoday.com/news/local/crime-and-courts/retired-st-louis-cop-shot-to-death-in-robbery-attempt/article_4fbbaf89-f6e0-5708-994d-1b0752ae478a.html#tracking-source=home-top-story-1

Kids out early on a Monday morning committing armed robbery... wtf?

I'd be willing to bet that these aren't their first arrests, too.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Guns aren't shields