Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Kingofalldems

(40,325 posts) Wed Oct 31, 2018, 07:15 PM Oct 2018

Daily Show: Happy Halloween from Fox News!

Link to tweet

6 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Daily Show: Happy Halloween from Fox News! (Original Post) Kingofalldems Oct 2018 OP

Frightening underpants Oct 2018 #1

I laughed, I cried. Baitball Blogger Oct 2018 #2

If a station that's supposed to be news is spreading malicious lies, what can we do? YessirAtsaFact Oct 2018 #3

Yikes! world wide wally Oct 2018 #4

Great ending. IcyPeas Oct 2018 #5

that was great! 912gdm Oct 2018 #6

underpants

(196,823 posts)

1. Frightening

Reply to Kingofalldems (Original post)

Wed Oct 31, 2018, 07:17 PM

Oct 2018

Baitball Blogger

(52,487 posts)

2. I laughed, I cried.

Reply to Kingofalldems (Original post)

Wed Oct 31, 2018, 07:36 PM

Oct 2018

YessirAtsaFact

(2,113 posts)

3. If a station that's supposed to be news is spreading malicious lies, what can we do?

Reply to Kingofalldems (Original post)

Wed Oct 31, 2018, 07:37 PM

Oct 2018

I'm all for the first amendment.

But this is rank propaganda. AM radio is even worse.

world wide wally

(21,836 posts)

4. Yikes!

Reply to Kingofalldems (Original post)

Wed Oct 31, 2018, 07:46 PM

Oct 2018

Poor people!
Head for the hills!

IcyPeas

(25,593 posts)

5. Great ending.

Reply to Kingofalldems (Original post)

Wed Oct 31, 2018, 08:47 PM

Oct 2018

912gdm

(959 posts)

6. that was great!

Reply to Kingofalldems (Original post)

Wed Oct 31, 2018, 10:26 PM

Oct 2018

They used scenes form various zombie movies to make fun of fox's sensationalism

Reply to this discussion