General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsChelsea Clinton Mezvinsky
Interviewed for next month's Vogue. Described by Huma Abedin as the "smartest person I've ever met", working on her doctorate at Oxford, considering politics someday. WOW.

http://todayonthetrail.today.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2012/08/15/13294061-chelsea-clinton-reveals-politics-kids-are-a-possibility
Jeff In Milwaukee
(13,992 posts)Our little Chelsea is all grown up.
CabCurious
(954 posts)She better be the smartest person in the room considering what she's been given in life.
What was her first job out of college?
Wasn't it a top position in a HEDGE FUND?
cyberswede
(26,117 posts)Just ask George W Bush.
CabCurious
(954 posts)cali
(114,904 posts)it's nature and nurture.
pnwmom
(110,260 posts)cali
(114,904 posts)but that's just ridiculous in any case. Look, when you argue that nurture doesn't count, you argue that good schools don't really matter- that's part of nurture. When you argue that nurture doesn't count you argue that all the attendant privileges of financial security don't count- and we know that they do. You argue that all the attendant negative baggage that comes with poverty don't count- and we know that they do. It is, in fact, a highly illiberal view.
hobbit709
(41,694 posts)a box of rocks maybe.
Spider Jerusalem
(21,786 posts)"privilege" as such gives access to better schooling and more educational opportunity but it doesn't make one innately more intelligent. (And look at Bill Clinton for that matter who is brilliant despite having a less than privileged, lower middle class personal background; public schools in Arkansas, and still a Rhodes scholar, etc). Considering that both of Chelsea Clinton's parents are extremely intelligent I don't think it's necessarily unreasonable to assume that nature (genetics and inheritance) probably played some part along with direction and moulding of the raw materials through education and so on, but if she hadn't had the innate intelligence to begin with she might be a vapid socialite.
cali
(114,904 posts)I think it's a reasonable assumption that if you take two infants with similar native intelligence and place one in a nurturing environment with access to a good education and a stable and safe home life and put the other in an environment of poverty and its attendant ills, the former will, as an adult, test higher on intelligence tests. Yes, there are exceptions, but this is hardly a radical theory.
DonRedwood
(4,359 posts)and physical development and health.
She is who she is, of course, but there is a chance that if she grew up in a slum on the edge of a dump eating garbage and drinking mercury tainted water and getting bit by rats, she might not be as smart.
But that's just the science talkin'...
Bandit
(21,475 posts)pnwmom
(110,260 posts)Both daughters of privilege, both given good nutrition, etc.
zonkers
(5,865 posts)datasuspect
(26,591 posts)zzaapp
(531 posts)Just sayin'
datasuspect
(26,591 posts)ur doing it wrong.
although you seem to be VERY clever.
hang in there.
cool post bro.
Kingofalldems
(40,276 posts)Absolute RW talking points.
Just sayin'
zzaapp
(531 posts)allusion to a much earlier conversation. Is a "talking point"
any new idea that is contrary to your own, or that you can't grasp the meaning of?
Kingofalldems
(40,276 posts)And yes I grasp the meaning all right.
zzaapp
(531 posts)datasuspect
(26,591 posts)child.
you're not very clever, don't pat yourself on the back TOO hard.
zzaapp
(531 posts)datasuspect
(26,591 posts)zzaapp
(531 posts)datasuspect
(26,591 posts)why u mad?
zzaapp
(531 posts)datasuspect
(26,591 posts)here's a spicy taco for you.
zzaapp
(531 posts)Ineeda
(3,626 posts)HangOnKids
(4,291 posts)He was shown the door.
CabCurious
(954 posts)I don't mean to say she isn't probably very cool and very smart, but let's be real.
She's been handed a better education than most of the smartest kids could hope for. She's been granted access to the most powerful people in the world. She got job opportunities right out of college and doors opened for her that only the top 1% can imagine.
Top position in a hedge fund at like age 25? What earned her that?
Top NBC commentator position? What earner her that?
I do expect good things from her, nonetheless. I wish her the best.
But I am not going to glorify the achievements of somebody granted so many open doors.
zzaapp
(531 posts)You were throwing logic and reason into a discussion where it is not appreciated. I like that.
CabCurious
(954 posts)Better to write for yourself and have no public, than to write for the public and have no self.
― Cyril Connolly
spanone
(141,609 posts)hifiguy
(33,688 posts)Response to CabCurious (Reply #34)
Post removed
Romulox
(25,960 posts)Response to Romulox (Reply #81)
Post removed
Romulox
(25,960 posts)datasuspect
(26,591 posts)wow. that's what you are, what am i?
cool post bro.
unc70
(6,501 posts)DonRedwood
(4,359 posts)In an evolutionary stance, two people with high intelligence and leadership and political qualities married and produced a child....that child may inherit skill sets and brains from each of those parents.
She is obviously very bright. Who knows, her genetics might make her extremely well-suited to politics as well.
She also grew up seeing public service as the norm and the ultimate use of impressive brains.
I can't imagine she would be very interested in being the CEO of Yahoo or working on Wall Street. Those jobs are for the likes of Romney's kids.
LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)Seems as though you're confusing the words "glorify" and "commend"
LiberalEsto
(22,845 posts)she's witnessed the impact of her father's relationship with Monica Lewinsky being exposed all over the media, the unhappiness of her mother over it, the non-stop efforts by the repukes to investigate Whitewater to death, the political vilification of both parents, the impeachment, the perpetual media spotlight on all of them and so much more. And whatever move she makes in the future, there will be harping in the right-wing media.
I wouldn't want to be Chelsea for anything if I had to go through all the stuff that she's experienced.
aquart
(69,014 posts)And then there are the Bushes.
LukeFL
(594 posts)Yes she is priviledged and has received the best education money can buy but what did you all want? You wanted her to go to public schools and a community college just to satisfy her fatgers liberal fololwers?
Iam a liberal but if chelsea had The financial ability to get The education she got. So be it.
She is a well rounded girl, born to wealth but extremely humble and noble.
Lex
(34,108 posts)seems to be an epidemic lately
zzaapp
(531 posts)you are something else!
zzaapp
(531 posts)But one can hope. Posting to yourself is fun to see, however.
zzaapp
(531 posts)HangOnKids
(4,291 posts)Are you reporting?
zzaapp
(531 posts)datasuspect
(26,591 posts)zzaapp
(531 posts)I've always had the strangest feeling that in a former life, I was a Buddhist Monk, hence my innate talent for Martial Arts. Good topic.
datasuspect
(26,591 posts)strike a nerve?
HangOnKids
(4,291 posts)I come upon a thread and you happen to post in it, well tough titty. Report again, your last attempt was so grand.
zzaapp
(531 posts)HangOnKids
(4,291 posts)zzaapp
(531 posts)As much as I would like to continue to make you look silly.
I have a brunch date down at the yacht club. Good day to you.
HangOnKids
(4,291 posts)Make me look silly all day. I'm waiting.
Ya Basta
(391 posts)The disposition of your posts reminds me of Rush Limbaugh
![]()
HangOnKids
(4,291 posts)Last edited Wed Aug 15, 2012, 10:57 PM - Edit history (1)
Keep going Basta, you and zzaapp are quite the entertainers! Oh Sorry, it appears that zzaapp has left the building.
HangOnKids
(4,291 posts)Profile information
About zzaapp
Statistics and Information
Account status: Posting privileges revoked
Member since: Fri Apr 27, 2012, 08:44 AM
Number of posts: 531
Number of posts, last 90 days: 452
Favorite forum: General Discussion, 280 posts in the last 90 days (62% of total posts)
Favorite group: Socialist Progressives, 22 posts in the last 90 days (5% of total posts)
Last post: Wed Aug 15, 2012, 11:45 AM
obamanut2012
(29,368 posts)All of it good.
What are you?
zzaapp
(531 posts)CabCurious
(954 posts)Lex
(34,108 posts)CabCurious
(954 posts)Response to CabCurious (Reply #67)
Post removed
DonRedwood
(4,359 posts)that wouldn't be very interesting....
obamanut2012
(29,368 posts)I missed that post.
Egalitarian Thug
(12,448 posts)Just as it is known that nothing that does not have a link on line exists either.
Prior to 1992 we were all just squatting in the road rubbing dirt into our hair in an effort to appease the void that was our existence.
Romulox
(25,960 posts)datasuspect
(26,591 posts)hang in there.
Romulox
(25,960 posts)datasuspect
(26,591 posts)derp.
Romulox
(25,960 posts)datasuspect
(26,591 posts)you started it.
that's what you are, what am i?
zzaapp
(531 posts)MoonRiver
(36,975 posts)CabCurious
(954 posts)This girl was handed job opportunities out of college that other people don't even know exist.
ann---
(1,933 posts)she was handed job opportunities out of college BECAUSE SHE IS SO INTELLIGENT AND QUALIFIED.
CabCurious
(954 posts)Yes, that history degree clearly qualified her for a McKinsey gig and then a hedge fund position...
LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)On the other hand... what then specifically disqualifies her?
I imagine she is either qualified or she is not. One feels compelled to request any substantive evidence that she is not, indeed qualified for the positions she's held...
hifiguy
(33,688 posts)given that her parents are two exceedingly bright people. But let me assure you that connections are at least as important, and often moreso, in the elite. I was a summa graduate of the U of MN and attended Harvard Law School with the FLOTUS. I have been unemployed and underemployed for most of the last 25 years - once I made $60K annualy for a 20 month period - my best ever stretch - and now work for a subsistence level wage and have to file bankruptcy. Why, you ask?
Two reasons - I am a product of the working class with zero connections or influence and I am Asperger's. I've seen people with a fraction of my abilities fly up the ladder because they were connected and highly social. Truth is what it is and Chelsea Clinton had every advantage anyone can possibly have to go along with her own native gifts. That makes a HUGE difference in how your life turns out. Denying that is just willful blindness.
zzaapp
(531 posts)progressivebydesign
(19,458 posts)and fell flat on their over-privileged faces!
I know a brother and a sister, with the same genetics.. raised by two well-to do families, separately. And one is like Chelsea, and the other turned out as if he was raised with nothing.
Your comment smack of total jealousy. I would expect something like that on one of those other sites. Born into a family with money and connections? Yep. She was. But her parents worked for that money and position. What she achieved in school, and being a good person, that is something SHE worked for.
zzaapp
(531 posts)CabCurious
(954 posts)(sarcasm)
CabCurious
(954 posts)And I've know a spectrum of these types. Some did well. Some did okay. Some did poorly.
But in all seriousness, I do find it offensive that she's getting jobs as NBC commentators when I know extremely smart and hard-working journalists who will NEVER get that chance. It's NOT for the betterment of our society.
I'm sure I'd like her. I'm sure she's great.
But don't expect us all to fawn over her in the coming decades...
hfojvt
(37,573 posts)and Chelsea is almost as hot as Kate.
ann---
(1,933 posts)and yet - everything is STILL being given to her.
zzaapp
(531 posts)LukeFL
(594 posts)I mentioned something similar above.
Egalitarian Thug
(12,448 posts)CabCurious
(954 posts)That doesn't mean success.
Lots of rich and powerful kids have fallen completely.
How I judge people is not by what they've been given but by what they do with it. But I cannot applaud Chelsea for things she's been given.
Egalitarian Thug
(12,448 posts)Failure defined as suffering the consequences for doing a bad job, and suicide isn't failure.
hifiguy
(33,688 posts)which is what defines most of the 1%ers who have "failed." They never went without a meal or a luxurious roof over their heads in their lives. Anyone else would have wound up homeless and in the gutter.
Egalitarian Thug
(12,448 posts)Daddy knows some people and, voilà! Want to be a banker, politician, doctor, sculptor, race car driver, software mogul, oilman, hedge fund manager, news reporter, model, etc.
I suppose athletics would be an exception.
treestar
(82,383 posts)Even with the athletics, true they could fail but they'd have all the equipment and opportunity and time they needed to give it a shot.
Romulox
(25,960 posts)Egalitarian Thug
(12,448 posts)Worst owner in baseball, wrecked the team, but he made out great. He was even successful at snorting and drinking, I suppose.
Paladin
(32,354 posts).....check out the sick vilification Ms. Clinton was subjected to by the radical right when she was young, and ponder whether your statement really advances those progressive principles you supposedly adhere to. Thanks for your efforts towards improvement.
CabCurious
(954 posts)My judgement on Chelsea remains open.
I hope she takes all of this and does incredible things for society.
DURHAM D
(33,054 posts)Paladin
(32,354 posts)Response to Paladin (Reply #61)
Post removed
liberal N proud
(61,194 posts)And I don't put her in the same class as the silver-spoons, Romney and the Bu$h's.
I am happy to see her rise up after the beating her parents have taken in the media for being so brilliant.
DonRedwood
(4,359 posts)LaydeeBug
(10,291 posts)Beacool
(30,517 posts)Actually, now that I think about it, the Clintons were the poorest couple to enter the WH in decades. They didn't even own a house.
Did you read the interview? Whatever else can be said about the Clintons, they are great parents. Chelsea is bright, caring and well grounded. There's no diva in her.
SemperEadem
(8,053 posts)so what if it was?
JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)I grew up lower middle class, sad Philly row home (a little nicer than Rocky's). I did not pick my parents.
My wife and I now do pretty well. College degrees, successful careers, nice home. And our son, and our two daughters live much better than either my wife or I did as kids.
But again, our children did not PICK us as parents, any more than Chelsea picked her's.
The real question will be ... "What will Chelsea do with the advantages her birth provided?"
Will she follow in Mitt's path ... or one that helps others. We don't know yet.
But given how hard it must have been to be the "first daughter" called a "dog" by those who hated her father, so far, she seem to be doing ok. At least she's not a McCain or Cheney daughter.
Maybe we should give her a chance to do something wrong, before we attack her.
Canuckistanian
(42,290 posts)That maybe, JUST MAYBE, a child of a famous American CAN'T be accomplished or brilliant?
Please state specifics and examples.
OK? Thanks.
Freddie
(10,104 posts)as she gets older. Smart and accomplished, she will be a force in politics in the near future! The apple dosen't fall far, etc.
Her mother-in-law Marjorie Mezvinsky was my Congresswoman. Great lady.
zzaapp
(531 posts)Freddie
(10,104 posts)Bill should put some weight back on, he does not look good thin. Although I'm sure the weight loss was for his health.
zzaapp
(531 posts)ann---
(1,933 posts)that is why he lost so much weight. He's probably in the best shape of his entire life now.
zzaapp
(531 posts)very drawn and tired. Maybe it's the vegetable thing.
hifiguy
(33,688 posts)and now he's rail thin. I think that's it.
zzaapp
(531 posts)MgtPA
(1,022 posts)I grew up in her district.
Freddie
(10,104 posts)Used to live in Lansdale, in Bucks Co. now. I got MMM's name wrong, she's Marjorie Margolies now since her divorce.
MgtPA
(1,022 posts)rurallib
(64,688 posts)In Iowa's old first congressional district.
aint_no_life_nowhere
(21,925 posts)Of course that mainly came from right wingers like Limbaugh who had to develop a different sense of aesthetic beauty to keep from going insane when they look in the mirror. I thought Chelsea was a cute kid who has grown up to be a very attractive young woman. If she's an extremely smart person to boot, then she's almost got it all.
Posteritatis
(18,807 posts)Hassin Bin Sober
(27,461 posts)....I think we can surmise how he likes his pre-teens to dress, look and act.
brewens
(15,359 posts)This girl turned into a knockout by the time we were seniors, in kind of a Barbara Streisand way. She predictably dated an older guy by high school. Those cruel classmates from grade school blew their chances.
cali
(114,904 posts)JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)CabCurious
(954 posts)Especially given her access, education, and connections.
Ruby the Liberal
(26,664 posts)LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)An intelligent, attractive, independent, and strong-willed young lady. Enough to piss off even the most tolerant misogynist
BumRushDaShow
(169,739 posts)Thanks to that family (despite the dysfunction of Ed), Ed and Marjorie helped to break red Montgomery County, PA, heralding the beginning of the bluing of the suburban Philadelphia rim.
lpbk2713
(43,273 posts)Brains and beauty too, what a package.
Tommy_Carcetti
(44,498 posts)
Oh, and clueless to boot.
Oh Rush, karma is quite a bitch, isn't it?
CabCurious
(954 posts)riderinthestorm
(23,272 posts)She looks fantastic and Limbaugh looks like the family dog now.
Care Acutely
(1,370 posts)philly_bob
(2,433 posts)when she was an awkward 13 or so, and no doubt extremely sensitive, as people are at that age.
Allegedly John McCain said ""Why is Chelsea Clinton so ugly? Because her father is Janet Reno."
Rush Limbaugh also mocked her, as I recall.
progressivebydesign
(19,458 posts)Rob H.
(5,849 posts)and how ugly I thought I was, and that was without having a US Senator and a bloviating right-wing radio host (both grown men, at least chronologically) making fun of me. That must have been awful for her.
hifiguy
(33,688 posts)boys or girls. I was a gawky stringbean for most of my teens. Chelsea turned out just fine, though. Just fine.
Stinky The Clown
(68,952 posts)(To be sure, millions have had a tougher life than she has . . . . but . . . . .)
She has stayed poised and together in the face of some serious personal tribulations.
Growing up in the White House is not easy. Every other White House child has reported that.
At probably the most sensitive and awkward time of her life she was ridiculed in an incredibly public way by some incredibly powerful people - like John McLame and drug addicted Limbaugh - for her looks. A 13 year child was subjected to ridicule by grown men. Disgusting.
She had to live through the result of her father's disgusting philandering. Who can forget that picture of her walking with her parents across the White House lawn, holding their hands as they were to either side of her. She was clearly the glue that held them together. She was on the national stage again, dealing with family pain as both a victim and a healer.
Her progress in life is inspiring. How can her parents not be proud of her?
I suspect she is not at Oxford as a legacy. I suspect she is there on the basis of merit.
Anyone who has a problem with her, can bite me.
HappyMe
(20,277 posts)Well said. I can't believe so many here are dumping on her.
Compare Chelsea to this trainwreck.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10021135317
BeyondGeography
(41,101 posts)Must be a global celebrity ruling class tinged with an overabundance of amour-propre kind of thing.
Rosa Luxemburg
(28,627 posts)hamsterjill
(17,577 posts)One day, maybe.
CabCurious
(954 posts)She needs to step out of the Wall Street and Academic world to get into politics as a progressive.
Beacool
(30,517 posts)Rosa Luxemburg
(28,627 posts)How about Clinton/O'Malley 2016 either Hillary or Chelsea
Beacool
(30,517 posts)Chelsea is not ready yet for the big top, but can start running for state office. She shouldn't try to pull a Caroline Kennedy. Remember when she was hoping to be appointed to Hillary's seat although she had never ran for office previously? People should earn their seats, not being handed to them in a silver platter due to their family name. When Hillary ran for the senate she went to every county in NY state. She worked her butt off campaigning and listening to people's needs. If Chelsea wants to be elected to any office, she needs to do the same as her mom: work hard and earn the seat.
Rosa Luxemburg
(28,627 posts)It is important that Chelsea starts early.
Romulox
(25,960 posts)LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)I imagine an example validates a premise for many people.
Romulox
(25,960 posts)leftstreet
(40,671 posts)Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)To paint the Clintons as some sort of old fuckin' aristocracy is ridiculous.
Romulox
(25,960 posts)What's with the attempt to change the subject?
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)It's a Chelsea-based conspiracy to change the subject, is what it is.
leftstreet
(40,671 posts)DLClinton, such a beacon of example and representation for the working classes!
The solidarity brings a tear...
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)I didn't agree with everything he did, but he was certainly one of the better ones of the 20th Century.
leftstreet
(40,671 posts)And let us not forget his destruction of Glass Steagall. We could go on.
Yes, quite the little 'reformer.'
He uh, 'climbed' his way into the upper class at our expense
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)Was he an elf?
leftstreet
(40,671 posts)Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)fall back on the dreaded blowjob.


PotatoChip
(3,186 posts)Chelsea is an amazing young woman!
Love that pic of her too. She looks very happy and self assured. She'd make any parent proud.
polichick
(37,626 posts)I'm sure she'll make good use of her talents.
Le Taz Hot
(22,271 posts)calling her a dog. I believe she was 12 at the time. What a despicable pile of horse manure he is.
Javaman
(65,710 posts)LiberalLoner
(11,467 posts)april
(1,148 posts)DURHAM D
(33,054 posts)and Huma has been in the room with all of the current world leaders. Chelsea is a combination of the best of both of her parents.
Just a few days after I listened to her speak and then got to talk with Chelsea I had an opportunity to talk to her mother. I gushed with admiration about Chelsea's vast knowledge on so many issues and we agreed on what an amazing young woman she is and then Hillary said - "She is something else isn't she."
She really is something and if she runs for public office everyone in this country will come to understand that. If she just heads her father's and then her mother's foundations most of the rest of the world will know but us not so much.
Jennicut
(25,415 posts)back then. She may have "privilege" but I wouldn't have wanted her life. She grew up being very scrutinized. She was an only child and the media was not always kind to her.
Gormy Cuss
(30,884 posts)Last edited Wed Aug 15, 2012, 09:41 PM - Edit history (1)
Neither the OP link on MSN nor the original Vogue article refer to her as anything but Chelsea Clinton. She's clearly retained her own name without modification.
In the 21st century, assuming that married women always append their husband's surnames to their own is, well, quaint.
hedgehog
(36,286 posts)how much photoshopping went on? That waistline looks a little pinched. It's a shame that someone thought that what nature and hard work gave her wasn't enough!
cali
(114,904 posts)and that's fine, but it wasn't all nature and hard work.
hedgehog
(36,286 posts)without straightening it. I guess to each her own!
DURHAM D
(33,054 posts)EmeraldCityGrl
(4,310 posts)perspective cosmetic surgery, fashion and all forms of marketing oneself
play into the the publics image of a public figure. Research has proven attractive
adults, tall men, women with a certain waist to hip ratios, facial symmetry succeed where
others fail in career as well as in attracting a mate.
I doubt from this election year forward we will be able to elect a president that
doesn't fit into the publics view of what's considered "attractive." Sad but true.
DURHAM D
(33,054 posts)If you want to have a conversation about your issue that is okay but don't do this add on crap trashing in this thread.
EmeraldCityGrl
(4,310 posts)Making an observation about our culture. Deal with it.
cali
(114,904 posts)and frankly, I don't see anything wrong with it, but it's an ill kept secret.
DURHAM D
(33,054 posts)Beacool
(30,517 posts)I've seen that girl since her parents moved to NY. She obviously straightens her hair and used to have braces on her teeth, but she hasn't had plastic surgery.
Brainstormy
(2,542 posts)I'll never forget how cruel I thought Limbaugh's attack on Chelsea as a 13-year-old was. Like Sanda Fluke, however, she probably now considers it a badge of honor. And even Fatso would have to admit she's become a beautiful young woman.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)isn't in any position to criticize anyone's appearance, ever.

applegrove
(132,207 posts)Beacool
(30,517 posts)Hillary had a lot of trouble getting pregnant, they weren't able to have any more.
applegrove
(132,207 posts)going.
Beacool
(30,517 posts)At least two. We'll just have to wait and see.
Starry Messenger
(32,381 posts)I hate capitalism as much as the next guy or gal, but it would be nice to celebrate a progressive woman's accomplishments without hours long flame-wars on if she is worthy. At the end of the day, she's stumping for the 99%--yeah, I don't like the hedge fund thing either, but sadly our political life in the US means that access means $. And exploiting divisions among capitalists is a better tactic than just lumping everyone in with ultra-right free market a-holes.
Odin2005
(53,521 posts)And I guess I still do.
Enrique
(27,461 posts)she seems kind of private to me.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)I'm not in favor of political dynasties, per se, but it would be cool if she decided to pursue that sort of future.
Romulox
(25,960 posts)demwing
(16,916 posts)If the person seeking office would have been able to get there on their own, why should anyone care who their parents are?
Romulox
(25,960 posts)to a country in which any mother's son or daughter could grow up to be President?
It's long-gone, in favor of the latest "MY turn!" child of privilege and wealth.
If nobody should care who their parents are, then the W.s and the Chelseas of the world would never get a chance at President.
Paladin
(32,354 posts)Just wondering how far your Storm The Barricades mentality extends......
Romulox
(25,960 posts)(without exception).
Romulox
(25,960 posts)Paladin
(32,354 posts)....you've lost my support. And I think a majority of DU'ers would feel the same way, particularly about raising an alarm on what Chelsea Clinton might or might not do......
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)it will be years from now and it will be the Senate. To lump her in with W is disgusting. The woman has never run for office and when stumping for her mother she did not make speeches, she took open questions.
What other Presidents or candidates, aside from W had powerful parents in politics? Not Bill, not Jimmy, HW has ties but not elected ties, Reagan was the worst, but also not related to anyone who'd ever held any office or wealth of any kind. Obama of course was working at 31 Flavors when I, same age, was making tons more than he was. How do they qualify as 'my turn' candidates? HW in a way, but as evil as he was he also had a lifetime of government work behind him, no one knew his daddy, they knew him.
So other than W, which are the 'Chelseas and W's' of this world? You made the claim that they are part of some group of 'my turns' that long ago replaced notions of Presidents coming up from the People. Can you explain to me which of Obama's family allowed him 'his turn'? How about Bill?
What made Carter's turn a function of family ties and wealth?
Romulox
(25,960 posts)is just factually correct--that is, a child born into privilege who has had opportunities average Americans can never have (no matter how "smart".)
As for the rest of your post, one obvious choice is Jeb Bush, who, at one time, had a claim to a "turn" at President.
demwing
(16,916 posts)disqualify children of former elected official from seeking political office, even if they're otherwise exceedingly qualified. Too bad for them (and us) ... if they had only been born to the noble life of the impoverished, then they might have something to offer.
demwing
(16,916 posts)..or daughter could grow up to be President?"
We live in it - just consider the current occupant of the White House.
And BTW, comparing Chelsea to W is beneath you.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)Consistency is the hobgoblin of small minds.
brewens
(15,359 posts)for the rebellion aspect, having been a smoker myself. I have since quit but am not the type to go anti-smoking crusader.
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)scary memory for facts and numbers, ask her a question, you get an answer. More than you wanted usually. She's impressive.
mfcorey1
(11,134 posts)BOG PERSON
(2,916 posts)what an inspiration to us all
LaydeeBug
(10,291 posts)GreenPartyVoter
(73,393 posts)sense that she is also smart.
Beacool
(30,517 posts)Now even Chelsea is a target. Some of the comments are worthy of a RW site.
It doesn't matter. Chelsea will flourish and succeed. She's as bright as her parents, down to earth and an overall great person.
progressivebydesign
(19,458 posts)I was thinking about the vitriol on DU this week about Chelsea and how well she's turned out, in spite of growing up in a fish bowl, being personally attacked by the right for everything from her looks, to her intelligence.
And I remembered. Her Father became President, after being enduring abuse at home, growing up with nothing, and somehow getting into college, and becoming President. Hillary Clinton came from a good home, but she was NOT American Royalty in the least.. she did not have a bloodline OR an oil line behind her.
Chelsea is the product of two people that realized the American Dream, by their own smarts and hard work. Why in the world would people be shitting on what she's accomplished?
And when Malia and Sasha Obama turn out just as successful, will you be hating on them, too?