Since Gillum conceded last night, is it still possible

[KCDebbie]

That a close final tally will still trigger a re-count?

I'm worried that he was too quick to give his concession speech...

[FSogol]

1. Concession speeches are a polite nicety, not a legal mechanism for ending a race. n/t

[unblock]

2. a concession speech is an irrelevant, informal statement.

he can still pursue a recount.

[dalton99a]

7. +1. Concession has no legal meaning

[Hoyt]

3. Don't know for sure, but doubt a concession is irreversible. Would be nice, but not counting on it.

[regnaD kciN]

8. Gore called Bush to concede the race on Election Night 2000...

...then withdrew the concession and pursued a recount for over a month when the vote totals changed dramatically.

In no way is a concession legally-binding, nor does it end a race.

[CaliforniaPeggy]

4. Conceding is NOT a legal act. It's not binding.

If the recount shows that he won, then he won.

This is my understanding but I could be wrong!

[GoCubsGo]

5. Yes.

The speeches are just a formality. The only thing that determines the outcome is the vote tallies.

[Codeine]

6. Only vote totals determine the outcome.

A concession, or lack thereof, carries no significance beyond politeness.