Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsIf there is a case against the Appointment of Whitaker being unconstitutional
How does a legal case start? Can just anyone try to file an injunction against the appointment. Or does Whitaker have to take some sort of action and then that action gets challenged by saying he doesn't have the authority to take that action?
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
If there is a case against the Appointment of Whitaker being unconstitutional (Original Post)
TheRealNorth
Nov 2018
OP
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)1. If truly unconstitutional, I'm sure there are remedies through courts. But, it's a technicality
that just bogs government down, although Im fine with impeding trump from protecting him and family from charges.
unblock
(56,071 posts)2. Someone would need standing to sue.
That would include any senator, since the appointment bypassed the senate's advice and consent powers.
I think it would also include rosenstein, because absent a legitimate appointment, he's entitled to act as a.g.
Not sure who else could bring a case.
You may have a point, though, in that maybe no one has a case until Whitaker tries to actually use the powers of the office of the a.g.
Alhena
(3,075 posts)3. Yeah, standing would be tough.
