Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

bluestarone

(16,894 posts)
Fri Nov 9, 2018, 08:21 PM Nov 2018

Questions here. If we were to impeach Rump in the House and Senate votes NO. Then

In 2020 when we win the senate, can this vote be RE-TAKEN? Does the House have to start over again? OR could this be double jeopardy? TY in advance!

24 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Questions here. If we were to impeach Rump in the House and Senate votes NO. Then (Original Post) bluestarone Nov 2018 OP
They would have to start over again still_one Nov 2018 #1
There are enough charges to take one at a time to avoid double jeopardy. allgood33 Nov 2018 #18
Double jeopardy applies to criminal charges, I do not think it applies to impeachment whcih is still_one Nov 2018 #24
Thinking about this scenario... wcmagumba Nov 2018 #2
More to the point, it would be truly stupid to impeach Trump PoindexterOglethorpe Nov 2018 #3
Sure cannot argue that point! bluestarone Nov 2018 #4
Not necessarily Major Nikon Nov 2018 #6
Do you think they would care about that? PoindexterOglethorpe Nov 2018 #15
The people you are referring to will vote straight ticket regardless Major Nikon Nov 2018 #17
It's my take that the people in the middle would see impeachment and then no conviction PoindexterOglethorpe Nov 2018 #21
politics is full of taking actions that have no hope of achieving an immediate, direct victory. unblock Nov 2018 #7
+1 honest.abe Nov 2018 #14
If there is clear proof of serious crimes and strong evidence they MUST impeach Jersey Devil Nov 2018 #8
one trial per impeachment, but we could impeach him as many times as we want. unblock Nov 2018 #5
That's interesting bluestarone Nov 2018 #9
actually, it would make for an interesting filibuster strategy. unblock Nov 2018 #10
Haha, that's brilliant. joshcryer Nov 2018 #11
Would be great i agree with Josh!!! bluestarone Nov 2018 #13
Your question has already presumed sarisataka Nov 2018 #12
Difficult to imagine a scenario Codeine Nov 2018 #16
In my opinion, we will lose both if we spend the next 2 year on impeachment GulfCoast66 Nov 2018 #20
I agree completely. nt Codeine Nov 2018 #23
We will not be in the majority SoCalDem Nov 2018 #19
Impeachment is a political, not criminal action. Double jeopardy does not apply. tritsofme Nov 2018 #22
 

allgood33

(1,584 posts)
18. There are enough charges to take one at a time to avoid double jeopardy.
Fri Nov 9, 2018, 11:18 PM
Nov 2018

We pull out another charge.

still_one

(92,108 posts)
24. Double jeopardy applies to criminal charges, I do not think it applies to impeachment whcih is
Sat Nov 10, 2018, 09:37 AM
Nov 2018

removal from office

wcmagumba

(2,882 posts)
2. Thinking about this scenario...
Fri Nov 9, 2018, 08:30 PM
Nov 2018

If drumph were impeached but not convicted in the Senate could
he then be indicted on criminal acts when (hopefully) he is out of
office in two years...in other words would the non conviction in the
Senate clear him of all charges later?

Major Nikon

(36,827 posts)
6. Not necessarily
Fri Nov 9, 2018, 08:36 PM
Nov 2018

If the charges were serious enough it would put the GOP in the position of defending a criminal, a pathological liar, and an asshole.

PoindexterOglethorpe

(25,839 posts)
15. Do you think they would care about that?
Fri Nov 9, 2018, 10:01 PM
Nov 2018

No, they would not. They, and all of Trump's supporters out there, would see him as a martyr, a saint persecuted by pagan Democrats.

I agree about his being a criminal, a pathological liar, and an asshole. You absolutely must understand that his supporters simply don't see him that way. Which means, impeached in the House and then either not brought to trial in the Senate (the likeliest scenario) or tried and acquitted would be vastly worse. Democrats would lose all credibility with them, and lose a lot among rank and file Democrats.

Our best hope is that Mueller actual indict Trump for one of his many crimes, and that's not likely to begin with. And even if Mueller does indict him, you can be quite certain that the current Supreme Court will immediately rule that a sitting President cannot be indicted, cannot be tried for crimes, no matter how heinous or egregious.

What we want to hope happen are things that I cannot state in public.

Major Nikon

(36,827 posts)
17. The people you are referring to will vote straight ticket regardless
Fri Nov 9, 2018, 11:13 PM
Nov 2018

In order to sway those in the middle you need ammunition.

PoindexterOglethorpe

(25,839 posts)
21. It's my take that the people in the middle would see impeachment and then no conviction
Fri Nov 9, 2018, 11:43 PM
Nov 2018

of Trump as a vindication of him. They'd take away, "Oh, he wasn't guilty" and because these are mostly very low information voters, would cheerfully vote to re-elect him.

Impeaching him just because we control the House would be dumb.

unblock

(52,163 posts)
7. politics is full of taking actions that have no hope of achieving an immediate, direct victory.
Fri Nov 9, 2018, 08:39 PM
Nov 2018

it's probably right that impeachment won't be a political plus for us, but the fact that republicans won't convict isn't an automatic reason to dismiss impeachment out of hand.

Jersey Devil

(9,874 posts)
8. If there is clear proof of serious crimes and strong evidence they MUST impeach
Fri Nov 9, 2018, 08:40 PM
Nov 2018

If they do not then they will be violating their oaths as members of congress to protect and defend the constitution. Under those circumstances if the Senate will not also do its duty then so be it, but members of the House should not compromise their ethical obligations because another governmental body might not.

I am not talking about impeachment for lying about blow jobs, but serious crimes, such as any quid pro quo by Trump or his campaign to the Russians for stolen emails.

unblock

(52,163 posts)
5. one trial per impeachment, but we could impeach him as many times as we want.
Fri Nov 9, 2018, 08:36 PM
Nov 2018

say, for example, once for every time republicans tried to repeal obamacare

there's no double jeopardy concept regarding impeachment, so we wouldn't even need to draw up fresh charges, though in practice we would modify them at least slightly.


impeachment and removal or non-removal has nothing to do with criminal liability. neither impeachment nor trial nor removal nor non-removal gets him out of any criminal liability.

bluestarone

(16,894 posts)
9. That's interesting
Fri Nov 9, 2018, 08:42 PM
Nov 2018

WE could make him the MOST IMPEACHED PRESIDENT EVER!!!! That ought to be worth something!!!!

unblock

(52,163 posts)
10. actually, it would make for an interesting filibuster strategy.
Fri Nov 9, 2018, 08:45 PM
Nov 2018

impeach him on one new charge every morning.
senate has to have a trial. eventually they would get fast at it and dismiss it in an afternoon, but it would eat up time they would otherwise spend stacking the courts....

joshcryer

(62,269 posts)
11. Haha, that's brilliant.
Fri Nov 9, 2018, 08:54 PM
Nov 2018

And no doubt it would take up more than an afternoon. Trump refusing to turn up to the hearings (which he is entitled to do) would make it go quicker. But they are required to effect service every time. Imagine that, having to send some page to the oval office to serve him, or more hilariously, have it flown overnight to one of his vacation spots in Crimea.

Also, each fucking person he's insulted over his entire time as President could be called as a witness, day in and day out, every single fucking time.

Man it'd be great, but it's pure fantasy, haha.

sarisataka

(18,539 posts)
12. Your question has already presumed
Fri Nov 9, 2018, 09:08 PM
Nov 2018

He will be reelected in 2020. If we win the presidential election there is no need to impeach.

GulfCoast66

(11,949 posts)
20. In my opinion, we will lose both if we spend the next 2 year on impeachment
Fri Nov 9, 2018, 11:28 PM
Nov 2018

Rather than passing one bill after another that Americans support only to watch the republicans kill them. That is the way to having both houses and the Presidency in 2020.

Admittedly, people of good character and meaning may disagree.

SoCalDem

(103,856 posts)
19. We will not be in the majority
Fri Nov 9, 2018, 11:28 PM
Nov 2018

Repubs have more states to defend, but they are all blood red..

If trump is impeached and not convicted, he might just win re election..

CO & ME are our only likely pick ups and we'll lose AL

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Senate_elections,_2020

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Questions here. If we wer...