Nothing moves House Republicans to embrace bipartisanship like a

[Atticus]

clear Democratic majority. The airwaves are filled with their plaintive pleas for "putting aside partisan differences".

Really triggering my gag reflex today.

[msongs]

1. repubs should form a caravan. that seems to get attention lol nt

[SWBTATTReg]

5. Indeed, LOLs! Good one! nt

[OnDoutside]

2. They have no intention of being bipartisan. None. It's just a setup so they can say they are

willing, but those dirty Dems....blah blah blah

[dalton99a]

3. "Let's make a deal. Instead of killing 20 million Americans, we want to kill only 10 million"

[louis-t]

6. "You do what we say and we'll call it

bi-partisan." Rethug Traitors.

[sinkingfeeling]

4. LOL!!

[unblock]

7. I say we embrace bipartisanship just like republicans did

Their idea of bipartisanship involves denying a sitting president any day in putting a justice on the Supreme Court, changing the rules to deny a democratic minority in the senat from having any say in putting a justice on the Supreme Court, and putting an accused attempted rapist on the Supreme Court by the lowest vote margin in history over the objections of millions of women.

If that's their idea of bipartisanship, then I think we should absolutely work toward that and let them have exactly what they're asking for.

[Volaris]

8. Well, no.

The reason is that this time, the partinsanship isn't about political outlooks or worldviews.

It's about to what extent the Republican pResident broke the law, cheated to get elected, obstructed justice both before and after the fact, and how MUCH money he helped steal from the general population of Russian taxpayers.

So NO, because this is about the Rule of Law, and you either support that endeavor...or....you don't.

Run for reelction on Not - Law.
Nancy Pelosi fucking DARES YOU hahahhahahaha!