General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsChemisse
(31,394 posts)An illegal appointment should not just be allowed to stand.
SimpleC
(279 posts)In It to Win It
(12,809 posts)Buckeyeblue
(6,439 posts)TomSlick
(13,090 posts)When the US is a party to litigation, it is in the name of the Attorney General. In this case, Jeff Sessions. What would normally happen when the AG leaves office, is the new AG is substituted as the named party as a simple administrative matter. The problem is that if the acting AG doesn't validly hold the office, there is no party. The concern is that any resolution of the cases, by judgment or settlement, would not be binding because the faux AG is not properly a party.
This could be a really big deal. The US has the largest number of cases pending in federal court. Some federal judge somewhere is going to rule that a case cannot proceed unless Rosenstein is named as the acting AG. If Trump does not fold, the US will simply lose the case.
It's a fine question that only a lawyer could love. That doesn't make it unimportant.
watoos
(7,142 posts)The narrative shouldn't be that Whitaker must recuse himself but that Whitaker is an illegal appointee.
Step 1 before step 2.
Kick in to the DU tip jar?
This week we're running a special pop-up mini fund drive. From Monday through Friday we're going ad-free for all registered members, and we're asking you to kick in to the DU tip jar to support the site and keep us financially healthy.
As a bonus, making a contribution will allow you to leave kudos for another DU member, and at the end of the week we'll recognize the DUers who you think make this community great.