General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsAbout the "new blood" argument against Pelosi
It is not a bad thing to use this argument, as long as the person using it doesn't endorse a man in his 70's in the 2020 presidential primaries.
pnwmom
(108,975 posts)NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)samnsara
(17,615 posts)Joe941
(2,848 posts)New blood doesn't refer to the age of the person. It's about fresh ideas vs career politicians.
Yosemito
(648 posts)No?
Blue_true
(31,261 posts)How many years?
This is going to be fun.
Blue_true
(31,261 posts)Believe me, when the 2020 democratic primaries roll around, some of the loudest screamers for new blood on DU will be supporting a nearly 80 year old candidate.
EffieBlack
(14,249 posts)Blue_true
(31,261 posts)Glamrock
(11,794 posts)Apples and oranges.
As far as Pelosi is concerned, it's about having leadership in the congress to carry on and move the ball forward with regard to Democratic principles and legislation when our Democratic leaders have moved on. The next leader behind Nancy is older than she is. That doesn't bode well for any of us.
The Presidency is a max eight year term with no immediate succession to that office.
For the record, I fully support Nancy for Speaker. Just thought clarification was needed.
MrsCoffee
(5,801 posts)Thank you.
Wounded Bear
(58,642 posts)nobody has stepped up to be the "new blood" and oppose her. At least, not anybody viable.
I think if we were to fire Pelosi, we should have somebody as good as she is to replace here. Show us who.
JonLP24
(29,322 posts)It is Conor Lamb the moderate Democrat that wants new blood.