Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Ohiogal

(31,999 posts)
Mon Dec 3, 2018, 05:01 PM Dec 2018

SCOTUS suggests that forcing lawyers to pay bar association dues violates free speech

Is the bar association the same thing as a union????

WASHINGTON -- The Supreme Court cast doubt Monday on laws in 31 states that require lawyers to pay dues to bar associations.

In June, the justices struck down state laws that required teachers and other public employees to pay fees to support a union. By a 5-4 vote, the court in Janus v. AFSCME said this requirement violated the free speech rights of employees who did not support the union.

That case proved helpful to lawyers challenging mandatory bar association fees based on the same principle. In a brief order on Monday, the court overturned a lower court ruling that had upheld bar dues in North Dakota and sent the case back "for further consideration in light of Janus."

Although the decision in Fleck v. Wetch is a not a final ruling, it strongly suggests the court's majority now doubts the constitutionality of requiring lawyers to support a private bar association.

Many states, however, depend on bar associations to regulate the practice of law and to discipline attorneys who violate ethics rules. In 1990, the high court upheld mandatory bar dues in a California case, but that decision rested on the principle that held states could require public employees to pay fees.

https://www.arcamax.com/currentnews/newsheadlines/s-2152598?ezine=114&r=SVKodsWpuQYZptg6I51lu9fcBLBNIHpSp-Ei-Ys-u4BDOjMwNTY0NzQ0OTpKOjE4MDU5MDI6TDoxMTQ6Ujo2MTUyNTc6UzoyMTUyNTk4OlY6NTM

9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
SCOTUS suggests that forcing lawyers to pay bar association dues violates free speech (Original Post) Ohiogal Dec 2018 OP
what's next medical doctors dont have to pay any fees AlexSFCA Dec 2018 #1
Republicans hate the Bar Association because they think it's liberal. octoberlib Dec 2018 #2
anything fact based is liberal to gop AlexSFCA Dec 2018 #3
They real big fans of the gilded age pecosbob Dec 2018 #4
Does this mean I don't have to pay to renew my nursing license? ismnotwasm Dec 2018 #5
There's a difference, perhaps slight, between "union dues" and "professional accreditation". dixiegrrrrl Dec 2018 #9
Republicans just want stuff for free. nt Xipe Totec Dec 2018 #6
Money has better Free speech rights than some humans MagickMuffin Dec 2018 #7
Sounds like the law is a "right to work" profession. JustABozoOnThisBus Dec 2018 #8

AlexSFCA

(6,137 posts)
1. what's next medical doctors dont have to pay any fees
Mon Dec 3, 2018, 05:15 PM
Dec 2018

to maintain their licenses?
Race to the bottom. IMO, this is different from unions, it’s more in line of consumer protection.

octoberlib

(14,971 posts)
2. Republicans hate the Bar Association because they think it's liberal.
Mon Dec 3, 2018, 05:18 PM
Dec 2018

How in the hell does this violate free speech?

pecosbob

(7,538 posts)
4. They real big fans of the gilded age
Mon Dec 3, 2018, 05:26 PM
Dec 2018

They'd like to return to direct appointment of Senators, so it stands to reason that they think lawyers should go back to peddling their services in saloons and horse-drawn wagons with no supervising regulation.

ismnotwasm

(41,982 posts)
5. Does this mean I don't have to pay to renew my nursing license?
Mon Dec 3, 2018, 05:27 PM
Dec 2018

Or pay for CE credits? Where does it end?

dixiegrrrrl

(60,010 posts)
9. There's a difference, perhaps slight, between "union dues" and "professional accreditation".
Mon Dec 3, 2018, 06:31 PM
Dec 2018

That difference, in my view, is the role of a union, which normally is about fair wages, fair hours, work conditions,
and the accreditation boards of some professions, membership of such often being necessary to get licenses which result in insurance paying for services, as well as (usually) licensed professionals being paid more than unlicensed ones.

Thus, all nurses, or social workers, etc. could join a union that helps improve job benefits...fair wages, work conditions, etc.
but not all nurses do, or can, or are required to, have specific accreditation for above and beyond general job duties.

I personally don't mind joining a union of like members, but I do resent being forced to join said union in order to have a job.

I did become certified and licensed in my profession, it paid more. At the same time I also discovered there was neat lil racket of being forced to pay for Continuing Education hours, usually at conferences held by the same Board that operated the expensive tests to become licensed/certified.
OTOH, I could and did get certification hours by doing one of the workshops at the conferences.

The Ala. State Board of Social Workers, btw, did belatedly support equal rights for serving LBGT clients
( took a few lawsuits)
but did NOT approve/mandate equal rights for its social work professionals.




JustABozoOnThisBus

(23,340 posts)
8. Sounds like the law is a "right to work" profession.
Mon Dec 3, 2018, 05:43 PM
Dec 2018

Union dues can't be imposed on workers in Michigan union shops anymore.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»SCOTUS suggests that forc...