Harris Franken 2024, Clinton Kaine 2019.

[greyl]

Would be fun.

[aeromanKC]

1. Franken/anybody 2020

Especially if Trump is the GOP candidate.

Game on!!

[LongtimeAZDem]

2. +1 /nt

[MariePinchon]

18. Franken is not Presidential material.

Perhaps he could run for Governor, or continue using his political voice.

[milestogo]

22. Franken is brilliant and would be a great president.

Screw Gillebrand and the rest of the backstabbers who threw him under the bus.

[Eliot Rosewater]

24. And he is PRESIDENTIAL MATERIAL, of course.

[MontanaMama]

25. I'm curious

why you deem Al Franken as unpresidential material?

[MariePinchon]

26. Because he resigned from the Senate.

I'm not sure how you run for President of the United States from there.

[elocs]

3. My opinion: No, just no. Especially Clinton/Kaine. Been there, done that.

And if you are saying Harris/Franken in '24, does that mean that Clinton would not run again or that there wouldn't even be a Democratic candidate elected in 2020?

[greyl]

5. It goes without saying that Clinton Kaine would win again in 2020. nt

[elocs]

7. And how is it that we elect our presidents?

Because if Clinton had won an electoral victory while losing the popular vote to Trump you wouldn't hear a peep of complaint about it here.

[triron]

8. No. Trump wasn't elected; he was installed by Putin.

HRC is legit POTUS not the criminal there now.

[StevieM]

15. Our own FBI played an even bigger role in installing him. (eom)

[greyl]

9. Not by cheating.

My little fantasy includes the 2016 election being corrected in some as yet unknown way.

[elocs]

12. If you're looking for political fantasies, DU is the place to be.

But we can rest easy knowing that no Democratic candidate, from a presidential one down, has ever cheated to win any election.
That's how we can call out the Republicans.

[Hermit-The-Prog]

13. point to any election with circumstances like 2016

There has never been an election in U.S. history with the perfect storm of interference, foreign and domestic, coupled with a 30 year propaganda campaign like 2016.

Blaming Hillary for the electoral loss flies in the face of all known facts.

[elocs]

16. "Blaming Hillary for the electoral loss flies in the face of all known facts. "

Which is why I don't, but had she bothered to campaign at least once here in Wisconsin in the general election campaign it might have helped here.

[Hermit-The-Prog]

17. you blame Hillary while claiming you do not

[elocs]

23. I blame Clinton for not campaigning in Wisconsin.

You, however, I will ignore.

[MrGrieves]

6. I'm sorry but "F*ck Him?"

Wow.

[dembotoz]

10. Hrc aside, was not impressed by kaines performance

Would not want that again .
A good man
A good Dem
Whatever he was supposed to bring to the ticket...
I would think we could do better

[Hermit-The-Prog]

14. Clinton / Castro ?

How about Julian Castro for VP?

[MariePinchon]

19. Tim Kaine brought a lot to the ticket.

Although he was not my first choice, it made much sense.

1. He is a very respected member of the Senate.

2. He would have been prepared to be POTUS on day one.

3. He tempered Hillary Clinton's progressive ideology, and would have been a wonderful sounding board and counsel for more moderate leaning Democrats.

[cynatnite]

11. I like Kaine, but I felt he wasn't not a good pick for VP

Plus, Clinton is not running again. That talk needs to stop.

[MariePinchon]

20. Clinton has stated that she is not seeking to run in 2020,

but if she did choose to run, she would be the front runner, again.

[Ace Rothstein]

21. No