Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Hermit-The-Prog

(33,328 posts)
Thu Jan 10, 2019, 09:29 AM Jan 2019

How the fossil fuel industry got the media to think climate change was debatable



How the fossil fuel industry got the media to think climate change was debatable

By Amy Westervelt January 10, 2019

Late last year, the Trump administration released the latest national climate assessment on Black Friday in what many assumed was an attempt to bury the document. If that was the plan, it backfired, and the assessment wound up earning more coverage than it probably would have otherwise. But much of that coverage perpetuated a decades-old practice, one that has been weaponized by the fossil fuel industry: false equivalence.

[ ... ]

Documents uncovered by journalists and activists over the past decade lay out a clear strategy: First, target media outlets to get them to report more on the “uncertainties” in climate science, and position industry-backed contrarian scientists as expert sources for media. Second, target conservatives with the message that climate change is a liberal hoax, and paint anyone who takes the issue seriously as “out of touch with reality.” In the 1990s, oil companies, fossil fuel industry trade groups and their respective PR firms began positioning contrarian scientists such as Willie Soon, William Happer and David Legates as experts whose opinions on climate change should be considered equal and opposite to that of climate scientists. The Heartland Institute, which hosts an annual International Conference on Climate Change known as the leading climate skeptics conference, for example, routinely calls out media outlets (including The Washington Post) for showing “bias” in covering climate change when they either decline to quote a skeptic or question a skeptic’s credibility.

[ ... ]

https://www.washingtonpost.com/outlook/2019/01/10/how-fossil-fuel-industry-got-media-think-climate-change-was-debatable/?utm_term=.fc862ee711fc


2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
How the fossil fuel industry got the media to think climate change was debatable (Original Post) Hermit-The-Prog Jan 2019 OP
k+r Blue_Tires Jan 2019 #1
we've seen the "false equivalent" tactic elsewhere Hermit-The-Prog Jan 2019 #2

Hermit-The-Prog

(33,328 posts)
2. we've seen the "false equivalent" tactic elsewhere
Thu Jan 10, 2019, 12:10 PM
Jan 2019

I guess it worked so well for oil, it just had to be tried in an election.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»How the fossil fuel indus...