General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsDoes Pelosi actually have the power to postpone the State of the Union?
Eliot Rosewater
(31,111 posts)She can tell the entire D party NOT to go and they would almost all if not all NOT GO!
gopiscrap
(23,760 posts)but she can stop him from presenting it in the House of Representatives
zipplewrath
(16,646 posts)She controls the House. He's required by the constitution to submit a report. He can give a speech anywhere he can get in.
euphorb
(279 posts)Prior to Woodrow Wilson (1913), presidents simply delivered a written report to Congress.
WeekiWater
(3,259 posts)dlk
(11,566 posts)The President
Prior to Woodrow Wilson it was very rare for a President to deliver the state of the union in person. A written message fulfills the Constitutional requirement.
Cuthbert Allgood
(4,921 posts)sarisataka
(18,654 posts)In the House. He could tweet it and just have Pence deliver a transcript to Congress
Cuthbert Allgood
(4,921 posts)I don't really think she would stop him from doing it, but maybe. I'm sure they are running polls on it to gauge the optics on that. Of course we know 31% of the population would lose their shit about it, but they have demonstrated they are beyond reaching.
sarisataka
(18,654 posts)Him that platform and if she did the shitstorm would be epic.
Kinda makes me hope she tells him to go to hell
dalton99a
(81,486 posts)The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,691 posts)to do it before Congress. The SOTU is by invitation from the Speaker.
Claritie Pixie
(2,199 posts)It is within her authority to postpone or ask for SOTU in written form. It is not up to Trump or the Senate.
Hekate
(90,683 posts)...was not always done -- and depends on an invite from (wait for it) the Speaker of the House. She just disinvited him.
He can talk to cameras anywhere, but he craves a live audience like a junkie craves the next hit.
dalton99a
(81,486 posts)hack89
(39,171 posts)the Constitution does not say where the SOTU has to be given. From Jefferson until Woodrow Wilson, there was not a speech - the president sent a letter.
herding cats
(19,564 posts)He can hold his own speech from the Oval Office if he likes, but there's no obligation for Pelosi permit Congress to host him.
So, essentially she was within her rights today to disinvite him.
underpants
(182,802 posts)herding cats
(19,564 posts)That cracked me up!
lastlib
(23,226 posts)but the Constitution doesn't specify how it is delivered or received. Use of the House chamber for a presidential address is probably controlled by the Speaker, so pres is pretty much at Nancy's mercy there.
dalton99a
(81,486 posts)LongtimeAZDem
(4,494 posts)absent that invitation, he has no authority to do so.
peggysue2
(10,828 posts)Pelosi controls power over. Trumpski must have her approval to enter/use the Chamber to deliver the speech. I heard someone say, Dems were trying to give Trump and his acolytes a heads up on what this shutdown means.
democratisphere
(17,235 posts)when we already know the State of the Union is absolute SH'T! The USA is very insecure since drumpf took office!
Midnightwalk
(3,131 posts)From Wikipedia
Historically most reports were not in person
[link:https://history.house.gov/Institution/SOTU/State-of-the-Union/|]
From the same site there are a couple of other required reports, but those dont appear to be required to be in person
Budget Message, required by the National Budget and Accounting Act of 1921 (42 Stat. 20) to be delivered to Congress no more than two weeks after Congress convenes in January.
Economic Report, required by the Employment Act of 1946 (60 Stat. 23), with a flexible delivery date.
EffieBlack
(14,249 posts)But she has full control over whether and when he can deliver it in person at HER House ...
LongtimeAZDem
(4,494 posts)honest.abe
(8,678 posts)Like maybe giving the SOTU at a sports stadium or at the National Mall like an inauguration event.
I doubt anything like that is doable but I bet that is what is in his mind right now.
Moostache
(9,895 posts)Just show Trump thess images of Obama's 2008 acceptance of the nomination in Denver's Mile High Stadium:
Then dare him to do better in FedEx stadium...LOL.
honest.abe
(8,678 posts)God I miss him.
Moostache
(9,895 posts)This has been a nightmare since November of 2016 and it just keeps getting worse...
Response to Raven (Original post)
elocs This message was self-deleted by its author.
maxsolomon
(33,345 posts)Its all a reality-TV show to him. The SOTU was going to be a full-on White-Nationalist Campaign Speech.
"Utter Chaos", starring President Bullshit
LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)I think T was counting on giving the SOTU address to push his Little Wall Crisis in front of a national audience watched by a cross of demographics he wouldn't otherwise get.
I also think no is arguing anything, let alone a simple rook for bishop move, is too good to be true.
Gothmog
(145,231 posts)trump can give a SOTU from the Oval Office or some other location such a Mar-a-Lago
EffieBlack
(14,249 posts)Madam Speaker put him in a box. Either he straightens up and flies right, or he doesn't get the huge national spotlight that she can provide a president.
avebury
(10,952 posts)in the House. She is smart to tie it to the Trump government closure. We all know that he would turn it into to a rant against the Democrats. While he is required to submit a report on the State of the Union, an argument could be made that the format of the report is not set in concrete. Let him turn it in as a written report.
Gothmog
(145,231 posts)shanny
(6,709 posts)They'd be his captive audience and he would LOVE it if they had to sit there while he blamed them.
Gothmog
(145,231 posts)trump's only oval office address was a bust. trump was flat. trump draws energy from crowds and audience. trump will not want to do an oval office address
Link to tweet
onenote
(42,702 posts)Pelosi's stated grounds for suggesting that the delivery of the SOTU before a joint session in the House chamber be delayed are "security concerns". I guarantee you that Trump and his minions are working on getting DHS and the Secret Service to publicly state that they are confident that they can handle any security concerns Pelosi might have.
It will be tough for her to counter that message.
haele
(12,653 posts)She's perfectly within her rights to demand that the regular sworn federal security personnel they claim they can provide is not just being pulled out of furlough to be paid to do just this one event - that they've not be exposed to the duress of missing a paycheck and might be harboring resentment against either the Administration or "the Demz" that the administration has been demonizing since they took the house.
And she is also within her rights to set down the ground rules that no contractors, military personnel, or other persons who are not federal security employees trained as event security be used as a stop-gap for the SS and DHS employees who are working without pay. If he wants to waste government money hiring a group of Erik Princes mercenary mob thugs to provide security, he might as well get out to Riverside CA and hire a chapter of the Hell's Angels - that would be cheaper.
Claiming to be "confident" that the Administration and DHS can handle any "security concerns" Pelosi might have is not reassuring in the least.
Personally, if I were her, I'd want to ensure that the extra security component required to "protect the president" are normal, sworn security personnel who get a regular government paycheck and are dedicated to a functioning government as their employer, rather than personality, or religion, or political/issue based affiliation outside the Constitution.
Haele
onenote
(42,702 posts)And if DHS and the Secret Service say there are no security concerns with holding the SOTU as planned, Pelosi claiming otherwise will open her up to being ridiculed as asserting that she is a better judge of security matters than DHS and the Secret Service. Sure it sucks if that happens, but it also happens to be the reality.
allgood33
(1,584 posts)elected Reps have to have her approval to speak on the floor.
Jose Garcia
(2,598 posts)malaise
(268,997 posts)She can cancel, postpone, whatever.
MineralMan
(146,307 posts)Note that the Sergeant at Arms introduces the President, beginning with these words, "Madam Speaker!" Well, it will be "Madam" this time, anyhow. That's because the SOTU is given in the House Chambers.