Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

question everything

(47,549 posts)
Thu Jan 17, 2019, 01:42 AM Jan 2019

Federal Watchdog Finds Government Ignored Emoluments Clause With Trump Hotel

Officials leasing the Old Post Office Building for the Trump International Hotel in Washington improperly ignored the Constitution's anti-corruption clauses when they continued to lease the government property to President Trump even after he won the White House, according to an internal federal government watchdog.

The Inspector General for the General Services Administration, the agency that leased the building to Trump in 2013, said in a report published Wednesday that agency lawyers decided to ignore the constitutional issues when they reviewed the lease after Trump won the 2016 election.

(snip)

Apart from the constitutional issues raised by Trump's stake in the hotel, the building's lease states that no "elected official of the Government ... shall be admitted to share any part of this Lease, or any benefit that may arise therefrom." Trump's attorneys have argued that didn't apply since he signed the lease before he was elected.

More..

https://www.npr.org/2019/01/16/685977471/federal-watchdog-finds-government-ignored-emoluments-clause-with-trump-hotel

1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Federal Watchdog Finds Government Ignored Emoluments Clause With Trump Hotel (Original Post) question everything Jan 2019 OP
The problem with the emoluments clause customerserviceguy Jan 2019 #1

customerserviceguy

(25,183 posts)
1. The problem with the emoluments clause
Thu Jan 17, 2019, 01:55 AM
Jan 2019

is that there is very, very little case law concerning it. It may have meant something completely different a couple of centuries ago.

There are so many other things to impeach Dolt45 over, wasting time on what may be an ancient concept is probably not the best use of political capital and resources.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Federal Watchdog Finds Go...