Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

NurseJackie

(42,862 posts)
Tue Jan 22, 2019, 06:04 PM Jan 2019

Trump: I Will Deliver State of the Union Address as Scheduled, Wherever I Want

https://www.thenewcivilrightsmovement.com/2019/01/trump-i-will-deliver-state-of-the-union-address-as-schedule-wherever-i-want/

Trump: I Will Deliver State of the Union Address as Scheduled, Wherever I Want

President Donald Trump has decided to ignore Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi's withdrawal of her invitation to deliver the State of the Union address on January 29. Trump is planning to deliver the SOTU address, which is congressionally-mandated to be given to Congress, on the 29th as scheduled.

Where he will deliver the Address he has not said.

The White House is drafting two separate State of the Union Addresses, ABC News reports. One if he delivers the Address in the House before Congress, which is increasingly unlikely. The other would be more of a political rally, not in D.C., and aimed at his base.

Trump appears to be planning for a greater confrontation between himself and Speaker Pelosi.

"Republicans are encouraging Trump to force Pelosi to officially disinvite him, by suggesting the president announce he still intends to deliver the State of the Union from the House chamber," ABC News adds.


also

"A senior administration official confirmed to ABC News that the White House has sent an email to the House Sergeant at Arms requesting a walkthrough of the chamber to prep for the State of the Union address. The White House is still moving forward as planned on the address as they wait to hear whether Pelosi is officially rescinding her invitation."
73 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Trump: I Will Deliver State of the Union Address as Scheduled, Wherever I Want (Original Post) NurseJackie Jan 2019 OP
The SOU is a formal report to Congress on the state of the malaise Jan 2019 #1
All he wants and usually always gets is his platform ... pbmus Jan 2019 #2
It DOES show he's rattled though ! OnDoutside Jan 2019 #11
MAGAtrumpetters is more thoroughly descriptive. nt lunatica Jan 2019 #20
Stick to your guns Speaker Pelosi maxrandb Jan 2019 #3
And Mueller will be waiting for him. :) LiberalFighter Jan 2019 #4
National news networks should refuse to televise! FakeNoose Jan 2019 #5
this. not a live broadcast. highlights and news coverage after TeamPooka Jan 2019 #46
Almost as dumb as shooting someone on 5th Ave. bluestarone Jan 2019 #6
What a dumbass. If he delivers it wherever he wants, it's not the State of the Union Address. Squinch Jan 2019 #7
Not exactly . . . markpkessinger Jan 2019 #59
But he's not going to do that. He's going to have a rally that Squinch Jan 2019 #65
tRump doesn't deserve the invitation to delver the SOTU address to the House Totally Tunsie Jan 2019 #8
She should officially rescind it 20 minutes before. OnDoutside Jan 2019 #9
Or officially agree 20 minutes before. Freethinker65 Jan 2019 #12
I respectfully disagree KentuckyWoman Jan 2019 #17
Well, if you take that tack, she shouldn't have blocked the SOTU in the first place. You can bet a OnDoutside Jan 2019 #31
Dems shouldn't act or not act depending on how they think a future Republican congress will behave. in2herbs Jan 2019 #38
Agree. OnDoutside Jan 2019 #51
Is there ever going to be a "future Republican House?" hunter Jan 2019 #40
We all hope not, but until they are 6 feet under, they can still do dirty stuff. OnDoutside Jan 2019 #50
her basis was lack of security because of shutdown. She didn't "block" it, she said reschedule it emulatorloo Jan 2019 #45
I'm glad she did block the SOTU, but I don't for one minute believe the given reason. I OnDoutside Jan 2019 #49
I believe security concerns are a real issue. Do not want congresspersons to be put in harm's way emulatorloo Jan 2019 #70
I believe a future House will try to do it to a future Democratic President in any case DFW Jan 2019 #53
Exactly. It's unfortunate but it's true. Republicans look at Democrats OnDoutside Jan 2019 #55
they do not consider democratic presidents to be "legitimate" rampartc Jan 2019 #57
Indeed, they act as if they had a permanent lease on the White House DFW Jan 2019 #60
so you think it is some kind of religious right thing? rampartc Jan 2019 #62
No so much the divine right of kings DFW Jan 2019 #63
high ground? HipChick Jan 2019 #35
From his presidency there is no chance of high ground KentuckyWoman Jan 2019 #41
Moscow would be an excellent venue. guillaumeb Jan 2019 #10
+1000 Pachamama Jan 2019 #68
And the people who pay his salary. eom guillaumeb Jan 2019 #71
"and aimed at his base. " justgamma Jan 2019 #13
"I've been talking with my Big Macs, and you know what? They all said do it!" struggle4progress Jan 2019 #14
Bwahahaha Blue Owl Jan 2019 #15
Is there a sewage plant or landfill in the DC area that will work? Vinca Jan 2019 #16
Maybe he could deliver it from the gold shitter he brought into the WH residence. louis-t Jan 2019 #18
Don't make me say this. WeekiWater Jan 2019 #19
Ooooo! I like! NurseJackie Jan 2019 #24
Sure, let the democrats go.. Maxheader Jan 2019 #21
"Republicans are encouraging Trump to force Pelosi to officially disinvite him" ooky Jan 2019 #22
SOTU is an address to Congress wryter2000 Jan 2019 #23
Hold the Line Speaker Pelosi Nevermypresident Jan 2019 #25
Give him a Wall!! JDZ710A Jan 2019 #26
He's supposed to submit a written report per the Constitution. The speech is unnecessary... Hekate Jan 2019 #27
Pelosi has already disinvited him NastyRiffraff Jan 2019 #28
He thinks he can shove his way in like this... he's in for a surprise! NurseJackie Jan 2019 #30
What a fucking ass bdamomma Jan 2019 #37
He makes me laugh sometimes KentuckyWoman Jan 2019 #42
My sentiments exactly. smirkymonkey Jan 2019 #44
Under the Constitution, SOTU must be given to Congress and not a rally Gothmog Jan 2019 #29
The traitor shouldn't be allowed to set foot in the House Chamber again. Ever. dalton99a Jan 2019 #32
O'Donnell said no one is allowed in the House without the consent DeminPennswoods Jan 2019 #33
Omg! There isn't enough popcorn in the world ecstatic Jan 2019 #48
Doesn't Pelosi control the camera coverage from the House chamber? LastLiberal in PalmSprings Jan 2019 #34
I LOVE THAT KentuckyWoman Jan 2019 #43
Separation of powers. He can't just force himself into the House chamber. stopbush Jan 2019 #61
He's such a frigging BELLEND. bullwinkle428 Jan 2019 #36
That's an insult I have never seen before on DU. rzemanfl Jan 2019 #66
"Sergeant at Arms, REMOVE THAT INTRUDER!!" Totally Tunsie Jan 2019 #39
The coward in chief is not leaving DC ecstatic Jan 2019 #47
Next time listen up when Pelosi speaks Mr. Trump! riversedge Jan 2019 #52
This is potentially very dangerous orangecrush Jan 2019 #54
Trump might as well hold a Klan rally on the 29th.... ProudMNDemocrat Jan 2019 #56
if he held it at stine mountain his followers would be ecstatic. rampartc Jan 2019 #58
Constitutionally he 'could' deliver it to the senate since... WePurrsevere Jan 2019 #64
So what happens if the SOTU is not given to Congress? In It to Win It Jan 2019 #67
Well, not WHEREVER you want. You can't give it at MY house. And unless she invites you and lets you EffieBlack Jan 2019 #69
This is all a stunt like everything else marlakay Jan 2019 #72
He's flipping right before our very eyes, and he's so stretched what we know as crazy behavior, Baitball Blogger Jan 2019 #73

malaise

(268,930 posts)
1. The SOU is a formal report to Congress on the state of the
Tue Jan 22, 2019, 06:09 PM
Jan 2019

fucking union of states. It's in the effin' Constitution. When will M$Greedia explain basic civics to its viewers?

Mr. Mueller, HOR please get on with it - I can't take much more of this shit!
ITTMF!

pbmus

(12,422 posts)
2. All he wants and usually always gets is his platform ...
Tue Jan 22, 2019, 06:09 PM
Jan 2019

To spew his ignorant false flags over 33% of his followers, the trumpettes...

maxrandb

(15,320 posts)
3. Stick to your guns Speaker Pelosi
Tue Jan 22, 2019, 06:09 PM
Jan 2019

Maybe the media will give you slobbering coverage for "breaking norms".

They seem to love that shit when Donnie Shit for Brains does it.

Dems need to start breaking some fucking norms, like sending the House Sargent at Arms to arrest Donnie Shit for Brains Junior for perjury.

That would be a great start, and I think the House actually has a jail cell.

FakeNoose

(32,633 posts)
5. National news networks should refuse to televise!
Tue Jan 22, 2019, 06:14 PM
Jan 2019

Let him tweet his report if he wants to.

No more free TV time for him to have another campaign rally at the country's expense.



markpkessinger

(8,392 posts)
59. Not exactly . . .
Wed Jan 23, 2019, 04:52 AM
Jan 2019

. . . There is no requirement in law or the Constitution that the SOTU be delivered in the House chamber, nor even that it be delivered before a joint session of Congress. Nor, for that matter, is there any requirement that it be delivered as a speech at all. It is perfectly legal and constitutional to deliver the SOTU in the form of a written report to Congress, as every president prior to Woodrow Wilson did.

Personally, I think it woiuldn't be a bad idea to return to the pre-Wilson custom, since SOTU addresses have become little more than exercises in political theater anyway.

Squinch

(50,949 posts)
65. But he's not going to do that. He's going to have a rally that
Wed Jan 23, 2019, 08:03 AM
Jan 2019

is not sanctioned by the House and is in no way connected to the House. Therefore, it will not be the SOTU.

Totally Tunsie

(10,885 posts)
8. tRump doesn't deserve the invitation to delver the SOTU address to the House
Tue Jan 22, 2019, 06:16 PM
Jan 2019

unless he's willing to stand up there crying "Mea Culpa" and admitting that the state of the Union SUCKS because of him, and no other reason. Hold your ground, Nancy - do not let this cretin spend another hour spewing his lies to Congress and the nation.

If he DOES deliver it, it should be to an empty chamber with absolutely no news coverage. Let his holow words echo in a hollow Chamber.

KentuckyWoman

(6,679 posts)
17. I respectfully disagree
Tue Jan 22, 2019, 06:30 PM
Jan 2019

I believe taking the high ground is one of the weapons Speaker Pelosi has wielded with great skill through her years in office. Rather than rescind, I'd like to see her welcome him, even as she holds the machete of impeachment behind her back.

OnDoutside

(19,953 posts)
31. Well, if you take that tack, she shouldn't have blocked the SOTU in the first place. You can bet a
Tue Jan 22, 2019, 07:46 PM
Jan 2019

future Republican House will now do that a Democratic precedent. We've gone past the high ground I would suggest.

in2herbs

(2,945 posts)
38. Dems shouldn't act or not act depending on how they think a future Republican congress will behave.
Tue Jan 22, 2019, 08:26 PM
Jan 2019

Dems need to grow a spine. No SOTU until govt is open.

hunter

(38,310 posts)
40. Is there ever going to be a "future Republican House?"
Tue Jan 22, 2019, 10:36 PM
Jan 2019

I think the entire nation is going the way California has.

The Republican Party is angry because they know they are dying and will do whatever they can to hurt their imagined enemies and fiercely cling to whatever power they still have, to their last breath, no matter the damage they do to this nation.

Donald Trump and Mitch McConnell are perfect representatives of their party -- cruel nasty racist old white men who already stink of death.




emulatorloo

(44,116 posts)
45. her basis was lack of security because of shutdown. She didn't "block" it, she said reschedule it
Wed Jan 23, 2019, 01:28 AM
Jan 2019

When the shutdown is over and they had proper security. Or he could submit in writing

OnDoutside

(19,953 posts)
49. I'm glad she did block the SOTU, but I don't for one minute believe the given reason. I
Wed Jan 23, 2019, 03:35 AM
Jan 2019

fully believe that it was done to make him go ballistic, which worked wonderfully. The poster in post #17 suggested taking the high ground but we're beyond that. Democrats have for too long taken the higher ground and watched the Republicans piss all over them.

DFW

(54,349 posts)
53. I believe a future House will try to do it to a future Democratic President in any case
Wed Jan 23, 2019, 03:53 AM
Jan 2019

The fact that said Democratic president will probably NOT be holding the funding of the Federal Government hostage to a personal whim will not concern them in the slightest. If McTurtle can deny Obama's SCOTUS nominee a hearing, a Republican Speaker can (and now probably will) deny a Democratic president the SOTU.

But this is something that probably would have occurred in any case. Republicans seem hell bent on thinking up ANY slight they can inflict on ANY Democratic president. It is now in their DNA. Meanness is no longer baggage some of them carry around with them. It is now considered a necessary attribute for membership in their caucus. Ignorance isn't the only thing they're proud of.

OnDoutside

(19,953 posts)
55. Exactly. It's unfortunate but it's true. Republicans look at Democrats
Wed Jan 23, 2019, 04:14 AM
Jan 2019

taking to the higher ground, as an opportunity to do something extra, to remove norms that give them a win.

rampartc

(5,403 posts)
57. they do not consider democratic presidents to be "legitimate"
Wed Jan 23, 2019, 04:46 AM
Jan 2019

consider their treatment of presidents clinton, obama, carter.

DFW

(54,349 posts)
60. Indeed, they act as if they had a permanent lease on the White House
Wed Jan 23, 2019, 05:09 AM
Jan 2019

And all Democratic presidents are squatters.

rampartc

(5,403 posts)
62. so you think it is some kind of religious right thing?
Wed Jan 23, 2019, 05:33 AM
Jan 2019

the concept that trump is annointed by god somewhat escapes me. carter, clinton, and even to some extent obama spoke the evangelical language, but obvious secular divorcees like reagan and trump , not so much. oh well ......

DFW

(54,349 posts)
63. No so much the divine right of kings
Wed Jan 23, 2019, 05:58 AM
Jan 2019

But more like, "we had Eisenhower, Nixon, Ford, Reagan, both Bushes and Trump, so that should be proof enough that we own the place."

They save the God Squad routine for more esoteric stuff, like "we are a Christian nation, so only we know what God wants, so only we get to determine everyone's life," etc.

KentuckyWoman

(6,679 posts)
41. From his presidency there is no chance of high ground
Wed Jan 23, 2019, 12:08 AM
Jan 2019

nor from the Republican party. I think it is certainly acceptable to honestly call out a fucking fuck and theat the same time graciously allowing the traditions of SOTU. If nothing else it forces Trump to be the one who flounces off of it be goes denies him a pep rally. Either way the high ground puts Trump in a loss lose situation.

My very humble opinion...

justgamma

(3,665 posts)
13. "and aimed at his base. "
Tue Jan 22, 2019, 06:26 PM
Jan 2019

Oh please. Don't believe for a minute that any of them is not aimed at his base. Who do they effing think they are fooling?

Blue Owl

(50,349 posts)
15. Bwahahaha
Tue Jan 22, 2019, 06:28 PM
Jan 2019

As usual, he sounds like the spoiled child, determined to get his little way.

What a freaking joke...

 

WeekiWater

(3,259 posts)
19. Don't make me say this.
Tue Jan 22, 2019, 06:32 PM
Jan 2019

Dear Clinton,

Please start building enthusiasm now. Enthusiasm for your SOTU the evening of the 29th. Make sure you properly plan for the location and allocate all of your resources to get the largest crowd size. Enlist the help of other Democrats. I have a feeling you could fill a football stadium in many places.

Maxheader

(4,372 posts)
21. Sure, let the democrats go..
Tue Jan 22, 2019, 06:36 PM
Jan 2019

Setup some card table with food...Maybe get a few poker games going..
Is music allowed?...Maybe some LZ or Hendricks..Do it right in front of the
podium stumpy would be..behind..
Dementia boy hates to be ignored and twice hates to be made a fool of..

ooky

(8,922 posts)
22. "Republicans are encouraging Trump to force Pelosi to officially disinvite him"
Tue Jan 22, 2019, 06:38 PM
Jan 2019

Didn't she do that already? How many times does she need to disinvite him to make it "official"? lol.

I wish she would disinvite him whether he ends his shutdown or not. All he's going to do is tell a bunch of lies anyway. Maybe she could disinvite him again and this time tell him its because she's not going to allow him to use the House to tell lies.

 

JDZ710A

(10 posts)
26. Give him a Wall!!
Tue Jan 22, 2019, 07:15 PM
Jan 2019

Build a 1' wall like a toilet seat put it out of Pennsylvania Ave . and sat him on it will he is speaking some more lies.

Hekate

(90,645 posts)
27. He's supposed to submit a written report per the Constitution. The speech is unnecessary...
Tue Jan 22, 2019, 07:21 PM
Jan 2019

...and is in no sense supposed to be one of his misbegotten rallies.

In addition, Mme Speaker is correct: under the current circumstances, gathering the entire elected and appointed heads of the entire federal government in one place would present a security nightmare.

NastyRiffraff

(12,448 posts)
28. Pelosi has already disinvited him
Tue Jan 22, 2019, 07:26 PM
Jan 2019

Officially, too. She sent that letter on the Speaker of the House stationery. What the hell does he think this meant?

The U.S. Secret Service was designated as the lead federal agency responsible for coordinating, planning, exercising, and implementing security for National Special Security Events by Public Law 106-544, December 19, 2000. However, both the U.S. Secret Service and the Department of Homeland Security have not been funded for 26 days now — with critical departments hamstrung by furloughs.

Sadly, given the security concerns and unless government re-opens this week, I suggest that we work together to determine another suitable date after government has re-opened for this address or for you to consider delivering your State of the Union address in writing to the Congress on January 29th.


She was trying to be as polite as possible. Watch what happens if Trump tries to pretend he can force his way into the House floor.

KentuckyWoman

(6,679 posts)
42. He makes me laugh sometimes
Wed Jan 23, 2019, 12:15 AM
Jan 2019

That gif..cracks me up. The levels of pitiful are too many to count. The man is a cull.

 

smirkymonkey

(63,221 posts)
44. My sentiments exactly.
Wed Jan 23, 2019, 12:35 AM
Jan 2019

He can go fuck himself for all I care. I hope Nancy holds fast and doesn't give an inch to that bloviating orange tub of blubber.



Gothmog

(145,130 posts)
29. Under the Constitution, SOTU must be given to Congress and not a rally
Tue Jan 22, 2019, 07:41 PM
Jan 2019

The SOTU is a speech to congress and cannot be given at a rally https://talkingpointsmemo.com/news/trump-political-rally-second-state-of-the-union

Technically, though, State of the Union speeches are delivered to Congress, not crowds at political rallies.

Article II, Section 3 of the Constitution states that the President “shall from time to time give to the Congress Information of the State of the Union, and recommend to their Consideration such Measures as he shall judge necessary and expedient.”

Following the first State of the Union addresses delivered in-person to Congress by George Washington and John Adams, presidents delivered these updates in written form for more than 100 years, until 1913 when Woodrow Wilson revived the practice of delivering them in-person.

But the addresses have never been — and seemingly cannot be, constitutionally — delivered in the form of a political rally.

DeminPennswoods

(15,278 posts)
33. O'Donnell said no one is allowed in the House without the consent
Tue Jan 22, 2019, 07:52 PM
Jan 2019

of the Speaker. Senators can come into the House and visa versa, but no one else unless they are invited. If Trump and his entourage try to barge into the House, the Sergeant-at-Arms will refuse him entry.

34. Doesn't Pelosi control the camera coverage from the House chamber?
Tue Jan 22, 2019, 07:54 PM
Jan 2019

If Trump forces his way into the House (which apparently he has the right to) she can turn off CSPAN and the television lighting, as well as the microphone and teleprompter (which I assume belong to the House) and let Donnie have it. She can also prohibit Republicans from using their cellphones to record the speech.

She can tell the Cabinet, Defense Chiefs and SCOTUS justices to stay away as their presence is not required by the Constitution.

She can restrict the press to one one pool reporter who can take notes but not video.

In general, she can let Donnie give his speech, but take away his ability to spew his bullshit outside the chamber.

KentuckyWoman

(6,679 posts)
43. I LOVE THAT
Wed Jan 23, 2019, 12:19 AM
Jan 2019

Welcome him with open arms but no cameras. Don't tell him in advance. Then sit back and enjoy the entertainment of Donnie having a hissy.

stopbush

(24,396 posts)
61. Separation of powers. He can't just force himself into the House chamber.
Wed Jan 23, 2019, 05:18 AM
Jan 2019

He would be stopped at the door and told to leave.

Can any Rep or Senator force themselves into the Oval Office whenever they want? Don’t think so.

orangecrush

(19,537 posts)
54. This is potentially very dangerous
Wed Jan 23, 2019, 04:08 AM
Jan 2019

If he does force his way in, it will in itself be a constitutional crisis, and a huge step toward doing his job for putin, mocking our institutions, polarizing and destabilizing.

ProudMNDemocrat

(16,783 posts)
56. Trump might as well hold a Klan rally on the 29th....
Wed Jan 23, 2019, 04:33 AM
Jan 2019

I apologize for the snark, but that is what this is sounding like....A gathering of the MAGAts in their red hats of hate.

If Trump thinks this is going to get him high ratings, he is sadly mistaken.

WePurrsevere

(24,259 posts)
64. Constitutionally he 'could' deliver it to the senate since...
Wed Jan 23, 2019, 07:31 AM
Jan 2019

the senate is the "congress" too. Constitutionally he can give it in written form only. According to the Constitution he can also WAIT since it the wording is "from time to time'.

While we tend to think not it as traditional for the president to give his State of The Union report in the spoken form in the House Of Representatives with a written form given in advance it's not always been done this way and doesn't have to be.

Oh, and I've not found anything that says the president's report is "congressionally mandated" to be given on the 29th. What I did find however is although an invitation was issued, neither the Senate nor the House has passed the necessary resolution yet. Perhaps this is what the writer is thinking of but there's no '"mandate" yet.

WaPo has a very informative article on the history of the State of the Union. If needed I suggest using 'private browsing' to view the rest of it but below are what I consider the major points pertaining to this...
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/congress/q-and-a-does-trump-have-to-give-state-of-union-speech-no/2019/01/16/c7fafabe-19b6-11e9-b8e6-567190c2fd08_story.html?noredirect=on&utm_term=.f5b278100a02
Does Trump have to give a State of the Union speech? No.

WASHINGTON — The U.S. Constitution mandates in Article II, Section 3 that presidents “shall from time to time give to the Congress information of the state of the union, and recommend to their consideration such measures as he shall judge necessary and expedient.”

But the Constitution offers no specifics on how that should be done. Indeed, the modern State of the Union address — the pageantry, the televised address and the agenda-setting message — is a far more recent phenomenon. And the practice of delivering an in-person address before a joint session of Congress has not always been the norm.

Here’s a look at the history of the State of the Union address as the White House weighs its response to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s suggestion that President Donald Trump delay this year’s address or give it in writing because of the partial government shutdown:

-snip-

Q: Does it have to be a speech?

A: No. For Thomas Jefferson’s first address on Dec. 8, 1801, he sent written copies to both houses of Congress to be read by each chamber’s clerks. Jefferson wanted to simplify what he believed was an aristocratic imitation of the British monarch’s speech from the throne, which he thought ill-suited for a republic.

The practice of sending written copies to Congress continued for more than a century, when Woodrow Wilson resumed the tradition of delivering the annual message in person on April 8, 1913. He’s also credited with transforming the speech from a report on executive branch activity into a blueprint for the president’s legislative agenda for the year.

-snip-

Q: Has the speech ever been postponed?

A: Yes, there have been several instances — though all appear to have been initiated by the White House, historians say.

Ronald Reagan’s 1986 address, for instance, was postponed after the Challenger space shuttle exploded in flight on Jan. 28 of that year. And in 1944, Franklin D. Roosevelt was scheduled to deliver his address on Jan. 11 but instead transmitted a written message because of his poor health.

___

Q: What about during a shutdown?

A: The State of the Union address has yet to coincide with a full or partial government shutdown since the beginning of the modern budget process in the late 1970s.

The closest the country has come? Trump’s 2018 State of the Union, which was delivered on Jan. 30 — the week after a two-day shutdown that ended Jan. 22. In 1996, Bill Clinton delivered his State of the Union several weeks after the end of a 21-day shutdown that had previously been the country’s longest, offering to “all of you in this chamber: Never, ever shut the federal government down again.”

-snip-

Q: Can’t Trump just show up?

A: Nope.

Anytime a president comes to speak, it must be at the request of Congress, said Donald Ritchie, the former historian of the Senate. “It’s a very inflexible arrangement,” he said.

A resolution agreed to by both chambers specifies a date and time for a joint session of the House and the Senate “for receiving such communication as the president of the United States shall be pleased to make to them.” [*There hasn't been one passed yet.]

___

Q: Is there a State of the Union speech every year?

A: No. Recent presidents — Reagan in 1981, George H.W. Bush in 1989, Clinton in 1993, George W. Bush in 2001, Barack Obama in 2009 and Trump in 2017 — have chosen not to deliver official State of the Union addresses during their first years in office. Those speeches would have come soon after their inaugural addresses. However, many, including Trump, have delivered major speeches in front of Congress that have had the feel of the State of the Union without the title.

“It’s up to the president,” said Ritchie, “whether or not he wants to come at all.”

-snip-

Q: Could Trump choose an alternative?

A: There’s no reason why not. Trump could deliver a speech from the Oval Office or organize an alternative event on Jan. 29 — the date Pelosi had originally invited Trump to deliver his address before a joint session of Congress. The White House also could choose to delay the speech, as Pelosi has suggested. It was unclear how the White House planned to respond.

But Ritchie said it would be to the president’s advantage to find a way to deliver the address.

“You don’t want to waste a dramatic moment,” he said.


...And goodness knows 'Don the Con' Trump loves a "dramatic moment".
 

EffieBlack

(14,249 posts)
69. Well, not WHEREVER you want. You can't give it at MY house. And unless she invites you and lets you
Wed Jan 23, 2019, 09:26 AM
Jan 2019

in, you can't give it at NANCY'S house either ...

marlakay

(11,451 posts)
72. This is all a stunt like everything else
Wed Jan 23, 2019, 03:13 PM
Jan 2019

He does to get attention. I am sick of it and media that goes along with it.

If they refused to talk about him or show him for a week, he would cave not be able to handle being left in the dark.

Baitball Blogger

(46,700 posts)
73. He's flipping right before our very eyes, and he's so stretched what we know as crazy behavior,
Wed Jan 23, 2019, 03:15 PM
Jan 2019

that we are just going along with it.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Trump: I Will Deliver Sta...