Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe Constitution says Senate rules are for proceeding not interfering.... Mitch.
Article 1 Section 5
Each house may determine the rules of its PROCEEDINGS, Punish its members for disorderly behavior and with the concurrence of two thirds, expel a member.
Rules are for Proceeding Mitch not Interference.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
5 replies, 1043 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (5)
ReplyReply to this post
5 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The Constitution says Senate rules are for proceeding not interfering.... Mitch. (Original Post)
pwb
Jan 2019
OP
guillaumeb
(42,641 posts)1. What does the same Constitution say about the right of the President to have
hearings for a SCOTUS nominee?
AncientGeezer
(2,146 posts)2. It doesn't say anything about "a right..to have hearings"
guillaumeb
(42,641 posts)3. No, but advise and consent has always meant hearings.
Except when McConnell finds it inconvenient.
AncientGeezer
(2,146 posts)4. Not really..I believe they didn't start until 1916ish
guillaumeb
(42,641 posts)5. Accepted.
So, for he last 103 years....