Pundits are already saying the stone indictment is nor enough for collusion.

[drray23]

What the hell is it going to take ?

Because you know, Wikileaks is not Russia and we dont know if trump knew what was going on and willingly doing it. Apparently it's very hard to commit any crime if you believe pundits. You really have to mean it..

[FSogol]

1. LOL, luckily pundits aren't part of the judicial system in our govt.

[uponit7771]

2. They are word smithing, its enough for Stone but not for Benedict Donald

[Wounded Bear]

3. Lots of evicence of collusion...

not quite conspiracy yet.

[dameatball]

4. Being indicted is not a conviction. But it's not something anyone puts on their Christmas list.

[MagickMuffin]

5. The stone indictment is nor enough for collusion

So,

How do these pundits know something we don't or they are just blowing smoke???

So,

Pundits how do you know what the future holds.

[Hekate]

6. They all said that it is laying the case for collusion, & that more is being held back for later...

What do you want more: something that makes you feel vindicated today, or something that will hold up in court and land him in federal prison?

[drray23]

9. There is already more than enough

To impeach and convict. Ths problem is political , not that we dont have evidence.

As far as everything else If trump was not president he would already have been indicted on multiple counts.

[drray23]

7. What really frustrate me is no matter what is being found out

It's not enough.

Turns out somebody else already summed it up perfectly in an OP.
https://www.democraticunderground.com/100211725178

[Thekaspervote]

8. The pundits don't know what mueller knows!!

[SharonClark]

10. What pundits are saying this?