General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsTulsi Gabbard is a Democratic presidential candidate to watch
Less known, but equally a contender, is Hawaii congresswoman Tulsi Gabbard. Representative Gabbard is on the younger side of candidates at 37- years-old but has been involved in politics since 2002 when she was elected to Hawaiis State Legislature. Right after committing to this position, the attacks on 9/11 occurred. Representative Gabbard couldnt stand still and wanted to take part in fighting for this country. To do this, she joined the Hawaii Army National Guard and voluntarily stepped down from Legislature to serve two tours of duty in the Middle East. Between the tours, she still worked with the U.S. Senate to advise on certain issues which added to the commendible nature of her want to serve.
The platform that she is running on stems heavily from environmental passions, civil liberties and changing economic allocations. Her enthusiasm for protecting the environment, our air and water quality and sustainable energy stems from experience. She began Healthy Hawaii Coalition when she was a teenager, a non-profit focused on educating about and protecting the environment. Her drive for unity and serving the American people can also be rooted in her past service to the country through her time dedicated to the National Guard, with whom she still serves as a Major.
https://duclarion.com/2019/01/tulsi-gabbard-is-a-democratic-presidential-candidate-to-watch/
Response to oberliner (Original post)
Post removed
violetpastille
(1,483 posts)oberliner
(58,724 posts)Tulsi Gabbard is a proud Democrat seeking the nomination of the party.
themaguffin
(3,826 posts)oberliner
(58,724 posts)themaguffin
(3,826 posts)mahina
(17,699 posts)Though I wouldnt put it that way, I cant disagree.
John Fante
(3,479 posts)honest.abe
(8,685 posts)calimary
(81,500 posts)Hortensis
(58,785 posts)Gothmog
(145,567 posts)Link to tweet
?s=20
oberliner
(58,724 posts)Last edited Tue Jan 29, 2019, 01:14 PM - Edit history (1)
honest.abe
(8,685 posts)BTW, what does that photo have to do with anything? What point are you trying to make?
oberliner
(58,724 posts)The author of the Rolling Stone piece also seems to be on the young side.
honest.abe
(8,685 posts)Like incorrect dates or facts wrong.
BannonsLiver
(16,460 posts)Its supposed to mean something, apparently. The poster did that frequently when he/she was actively defending the Covington kids while trying to smear Nathan Phillips.
RhodeIslandOne
(5,042 posts)Wow. Woooooowee. Unreal.
Gothmog
(145,567 posts)Response to oberliner (Reply #75)
LanternWaste This message was self-deleted by its author.
obamanut2012
(26,142 posts)charlyvi
(6,537 posts)So you attack him personally by trying to show him in an unflattering photo? Not cool. Argue with his facts, point out where you think he is wrong, cite evidence that oppose his facts, but don't attack him ad hominem. It reflects poorly on you, not him.
dawg day
(7,947 posts)When I was a young reporter, I had to help deliver a baby calf at the state fair.
So your point is...?
reACTIONary
(5,777 posts)... I bet he flys a drone also.
lapucelle
(18,337 posts)hlthe2b
(102,376 posts)and we know the ending....
Initech
(100,104 posts)TheBlackAdder
(28,216 posts).
.
Autumn
(45,120 posts)a few threads here I have read and trashed about her. I had no idea she is running on the environment civil liberties and changing economic allocations. I knew she was the National Guard, but didn't know she still served as a Major. I'm going to be looking at her closer
This I found kind of laughable. Her 2017 meeting with Bashar al-Assad, the incumbent president of Syria? Does she meet with him often? Trump/Putin anyone?
"weak on Syria and the humanitarian crisis."? I don't hear a lot from anyone on that.
Seems that these thing are only an issue for Dems if someone wants them to be an issue.
oberliner
(58,724 posts)It seems like that is still an open question among the candidates. I'd be interested in hearing more from them about it - and about war and peace in general.
Autumn
(45,120 posts)a few things about the humanitarian crisis from the bombings and a few blurbs about withdrawing troops from Syria. It seems like the fucking wall and the boogeymen attacking us from the south is all that's discussed, it almost seems like those things are being used as a distraction.
oberliner
(58,724 posts)I wish that the networks could devote more time to a greater variety of issues. They definitely seem to spend more time on analysis of dumb Trump tweets than analysis of US foreign policy, for example.
mahina
(17,699 posts)This is a good article from the Honolulu Star Advertiser last Synday. Its our newspaper.
https://www.staradvertiser.com/2019/01/27/hawaii-news/butler-and-his-organization-criticize-the-press-decline-interviews/?HSA=72bb47cbf37cb9fee9ab9c8a2ca401668c4b4615
There are positives and negatives about Tulsi Gabbard but one of her gifts is discerning progressives emotional buttons and hitting them, leading some to assume we understand her values and can trust her. You dont and you cant.
Speaking as her constituent.
Autumn
(45,120 posts)her running for president. She's held the seat for 6 years so obviously she's been re elected a few times. There are other Dems that I don't trust also and as has been said here time and again the worst Dem is better than any Republican. I agree with her on her support for abortion rights, Medicare for All, her call for a restoration of the GlassSteagall Act, and I applaud her changing her stance to support same-sex marriage in 2012 and as some here would say, she evolved. She is critical of U.S. foreign policy re Iraq, Libya and Syria. Opposing removing Syrian President Bashar al-Assad from power by force seems to be a problem for some but we have seen removing dictators by US force has never worked out very well for the people in those countries.
I didn't know a lot about her till this thread and I goggled her. Any thread on usually turned into a Bernie thing so until I cleaned out my trashed key words I have seen nothing about her. She looks like a mixed bag to me and not being a constituent I'm happy to see her in the race and on the Democratic side.
manor321
(3,344 posts)Autumn
(45,120 posts)Glimmer of Hope
(5,823 posts)oberliner
(58,724 posts)Written in support of a Democratic candidate for president. What's the problem?
oberliner
(58,724 posts)Why would that be a problem?
disillusioned73
(2,872 posts)running for president isn't a big deal?? Frowned upon?? At a loss...
BannonsLiver
(16,460 posts)Gabbards not a WOC.
disillusioned73
(2,872 posts)I did not know this - thanks for the update..
Is AOC white as well??.. for future reference.. cause I guess I'm white now too..
spooky3
(34,481 posts)(And other) descent. Wouldnt Samoan ancestry (of some percentage) qualify as a person of color?
FSogol
(45,527 posts)oberliner
(58,724 posts)Nothing is more important than advocating for Democrats.
At least, in my view.
FSogol
(45,527 posts)Moostache
(9,897 posts)Says got into politics in 2002....then says 9/11 happened...that was in 2001.
I am not doubting her service, but this is sloppy bio puffery at best. Attention to detail is pretty important to me.
I wish her well but her candidacy seems to raise her personal profile more than anything else.
oberliner
(58,724 posts)The source is affiliated with a DU (Denver University) college fraternal organization.
pnwmom
(108,995 posts)KitSileya
(4,035 posts)To make sure she doesn't bite - because she has a tendency to hit at the Democratic party instead of the Repubs, and to support dictators like Assad and other awful men, like Modi and Trump.
oberliner
(58,724 posts)She does make a persuasive case for not having troops in Syria (and some other places), in my view.
TwistOneUp
(1,020 posts)Tommy_Carcetti
(43,198 posts)roscoeroscoe
(1,370 posts)Not respected in Hawaii for refusing to debate her primary challenger
rufus dog
(8,419 posts)happybird
(4,627 posts)An excellent 3-part investigative piece written by a local Hawaiian journalist.
I am normally a big proponent of supporting all Dems and not tearing down our candidates ... but Gabbard's not gonna go very far in this horserace. Nor should she, IMHO.
Squirrely cults that operate international pyramid schemes is just a bridge too damn far. She, and her top staffers, still have strong ties to the cult.
We can do better, and we are:
We already have several much, much better candidates to choose from, and the contender list is just going to keep growing. It's still very early.
rufus dog
(8,419 posts)But she will get a huge amount of airtime, especially on Faux News.
spanone
(135,880 posts)NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)ZeroSomeBrains
(638 posts)Her support of Assad and her embrace of the far right in India is disconcerting. She also worked with an anti-LGBT organization that was tied to conversion therapy. There are much better candidates either running or soon to be running.
oberliner
(58,724 posts)Clearly, not popular around these parts, but I feel like she could be an interesting addition to the mix.
FSogol
(45,527 posts)I'm sensing a theme.
disillusioned73
(2,872 posts)we know that much..
FSogol
(45,527 posts)Cha
(297,692 posts)https://www.thedailybeast.com/why-conservative-media-and-the-far-right-love-tulsi-gabbard-for-president
Drunken Irishman
(34,857 posts)And that raises a major red flag for me.
https://ivn.us/2017/02/09/why-do-trump-supporters-love-democrat-tulsi-gabbard/
Cha
(297,692 posts)pnwmom
(108,995 posts)are among the right-wingers who love her.
Maybe it started when she was attacking Obama for not using the term "radical Islamic terrorists" to refer to ISIS.
oberliner
(58,724 posts)I think that gives her a unique perspective on issues related to war and peace.
She is also non-white and non-Christian which adds another unique dimension to her campaign.
disillusioned73
(2,872 posts)sounds like +++ in my book...
I wonder what she did to get so much vitriol from her own party.. I wish I could put my finger on it..
brush
(53,871 posts)That should give you an idea. You actually haven't heard any of that?
She's wasting her time.
disillusioned73
(2,872 posts)good talking point..
brush
(53,871 posts)Get informed.
disillusioned73
(2,872 posts)when you believe someone is "perfect" as a lot of naive ppl believe - any criticism, large or small is seen as "bashing"..
brush
(53,871 posts)the President and leader of her party.
She's wasting her time ad has no shot, as witnessrd by her disastrous rollout compared to Harris'.
And now she's pitting herself against Hirono of her own state.
Not the best move.
disillusioned73
(2,872 posts)go on CNN & MSNBC & criticize the Orange one, I assume you applaud - or do you say... shame on you, party loyalty should be maintained!! Or do you say, they have some valid points here...
see alleged R's Max Boot, Anna Navvarro, Steve Schmitt & many...many & many/many/many others - the new darlings of the "resistance"..
I'm not the one being ridiculous here...
brush
(53,871 posts)And now back to Gabbard's disjointed roll-out. She didn't even alert her campaign that she was going to announce. Her campaign manager has resigned, and she didn't even go to Iowa or New Hampshire after announcing.
Waste of time.
oberliner
(58,724 posts)Hawaiis second Congressional District. The president released the following statement.
America's middle class needs Tulsi Gabbard in Congress to stand up and fight for
them. Tulsi will create jobs here at home by building from the middle out, not the
top down. She will protect Medicare for our seniors and education for our next
generation. Middle class families can count on Tulsi Gabbard and she needs their
support on Election Day."
Tulsi Gabbard issued the following response: President Obama has great aloha for the people
of Hawaii and the people of our country, so I am very happy to receive his support and look
forward to working closely with him to improve our economy, get our troops out of Afghanistan
as quickly and safely as possible, and work for the well-being of all of our people.
https://www.votetulsi.com/sites/default/files/attachments/press-releases/president_obama_statement_on_tulsi_gabbard_campaign.pdf
brush
(53,871 posts)She's wasting her time.
oberliner
(58,724 posts)But I think the likelihood of that happening is quite small.
Autumn
(45,120 posts)Religious diversity is a refreshing change.
BannonsLiver
(16,460 posts)ZeroSomeBrains
(638 posts)Gabbard still is better than a Republican but she would need to change a lot of her positions to actually have a chance at becoming a US Senator from Hawaii let alone become President.
oberliner
(58,724 posts)I look forward to hearing from and learning more about each and every one of them.
LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)But I get it... an objective premise can often change, predicated wholly on the convenience of the day or the mere direction of the wind.
BannonsLiver
(16,460 posts)marble falls
(57,240 posts)MineralMan
(146,331 posts)Her past positions on several things will eliminate her early. I don't know why she's bothering with this, really.
oberliner
(58,724 posts)See 2016.
Adrahil
(13,340 posts)The rise of Trump depended on a certain amount of sheer gullibility in the GOP and the electorate in general... not to mention suppressive effort of people like Gabbard.
The Democratic Party in general is not THAT gullible. She fades fast and early, IMHO.
oberliner
(58,724 posts)pnwmom
(108,995 posts)oberliner
(58,724 posts)There are a lot of interesting options. Of course, all but one of them will end up not getting the nomination. Gabbard is definitely a long shot. Personally, the candidate I am most excited about right now is Kamala Harris, but I think they are all good.
pnwmom
(108,995 posts)secret meeting with him; and her wrong-headed attacks on Obama for not using the words "radical Islamic terrorism" instead of ISIS; and her refusal to support gay marriage in Hawaii as recently as 2013, are among the reasons I'm convinced we can immediately narrow the field down by one now.
While it is still early, I do like Kamala a lot at this point.
oberliner
(58,724 posts)Which Democratic candidate has views that most closely align with your own on this topic and what are those views?
pnwmom
(108,995 posts)insist on using the term "radical Islamic terrorism" instead of ISIS -- because they believe, as I do, that all Muslims shouldn't be smeared with that brush.
All of them accept the view of the intelligence community that Assad chemically attacked his own people -- and I do, too.
And as far as I know, Tulsi is the only one who voted AGAINST accepting Syrian refugees (along with Republicans).
But I haven't looked at all of the other candidates positions on Syria, and I don't know the best way to withdraw -- I only know I'm not comfortable with Tulsi's positions so far.
oberliner
(58,724 posts)http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/1606/17/sitroom.02.html
Here's her position on Syria (per her campaign website):
https://www.votetulsi.com/node/25114
Gothmog
(145,567 posts)honest.abe
(8,685 posts)Could be why some information in the article is not consistent like the dates in these sentences:
BTW, Tulsi will not be a factor despite this student's opinion.
oberliner
(58,724 posts)But it's always good to get the POV of younger potential Democratic Party voters.
honest.abe
(8,685 posts)It will help to alleviate confusion when the content is garbage.
VOX
(22,976 posts)Article is positioned right between the Dormitory Doings column and the Kampus Krazies cartoon. Don't to forget to clip the 15-cents-off coupon when you purchase a small frozen yogurt at the cooperage.
oberliner
(58,724 posts)GulfCoast66
(11,949 posts)There is a reason 21 year olds and very few people in the 20s have leadership roles or other positions of power. Education and passion are important. But nothing beats hard earned experience.
Well, except in college newspapers. They have leadership roles in college newspapers which make many of the entertaining to read.
aeromanKC
(3,327 posts)To be the next one to drop out of race!!
stonecutter357
(12,697 posts)oberliner
(58,724 posts)Timewas
(2,196 posts)One of the worst cases of DINO I have ever seen
disillusioned73
(2,872 posts)who now works for CNN - anyone surprised??
Corporate media always takes care of their own...
Timewas
(2,196 posts)She is not actively trying to run as Dem.as far as I know.
disillusioned73
(2,872 posts)she could challenge Trump for the R nomination, as that is where her ideology/ loyalties are..
Regarding Tulsi, if you call someone a "DINO" at least show some evidence;
[link:http://politicsthatwork.com/voting-record/Tulsi-Gabbard-412532|
"Summary of voting record: Representative Gabbard opposes big business, foreign and humanitarian aid, taxing the middle class, domestic surveillance and supports consumer protection, disaster relief, funding education, environmental protection, financial sector regulation, gun control, public health, humane immigration policy, labor rights and wages, lgbt rights, avoiding default, poverty amelioration, racial equality, increasing revenues, taxing the wealthy, countering russian interference, a robust safety net, higher spending, women's rights."
samplegirl
(11,502 posts)Go figure. Now she can speak for her party!
disillusioned73
(2,872 posts)cause last we heard from her during her failed campaign she was FOR trumps wall and against shiny new "things" like AOC - so she fits right in @ CNN
I just don't know who she speaks FOR.. other than old, privileged white women that got trump elected.. like Shakiras hips, stats don't lie
Squinch
(51,014 posts)Kingofalldems
(38,485 posts)oberliner
(58,724 posts)Are you still referencing the Nathan Phillips video?
Squinch
(51,014 posts)brooklynite
(94,737 posts)oberliner
(58,724 posts)Including Abraham Lincoln.
brooklynite
(94,737 posts)oberliner
(58,724 posts)themaguffin
(3,826 posts)oberliner
(58,724 posts)themaguffin
(3,826 posts)brooklynite
(94,737 posts)themaguffin
(3,826 posts)oberliner
(58,724 posts)I give up.
Adsos Letter
(19,459 posts)From Ohio (1880)
oberliner
(58,724 posts)George II
(67,782 posts)Kingofalldems
(38,485 posts)FSogol
(45,527 posts)disillusioned73
(2,872 posts)safeinOhio
(32,722 posts)Not at the top of my list, but I'll be voting for the Dem nominee. I'm going to make an effort not to dis on anyone yet.
Right now I really like Warren's tax plan and Harris's charisma.
oberliner
(58,724 posts)There are so many exciting and interesting Democratic candidate to get to know better!
LongtimeAZDem
(4,494 posts)The Real Tulsi Gabbard
As Representative Tulsi Gabbards aunt, it gives me no pleasure to publicly air my doubts regarding my nieces political agenda, which Kelefa Sanneh describes in his Profile (Against the Tide, November 6th). However, I take my role as a citizen seriously, and I would be remiss not to share my concerns. Sanneh raises the issue of Gabbards lifelong immersion in the Science of Identity Foundation, an opaque religious organization that she and its founder, Chris Butler, have attempted to reframe as a resource. Gabbards answer to a basic question about Butler is troubling: despite calling him her guru dev (spiritual master) in her own promotional video, she denies that he is more important than any of her other teachers. She also has a notably mixed voting record, and associations that veer from certain progressive causes to the apparent courting of such strongmen as Narendra Modi, Bashar al-Assad, and Abdel Fattah el-Sisi (not to mention Trump)this zigzagging path through positions is vexing. Sannehs article walks the fine line of investigation and exposition in a way that points to shadows worthy of further illumination.
Caroline Sinavaiana Gabbard
Honolulu, Hawaii
Letter to The New Yorker, November 13, 2017
honest.abe
(8,685 posts)mahina
(17,699 posts)oberliner
(58,724 posts)To try to discredit him.
Also reminds me of when Republicans honed in on Rev. Wright as a way of attacking Obama's religious beliefs.
LongtimeAZDem
(4,494 posts)mahina
(17,699 posts)Courage to make her concerns known.
Tulsis father is her brother. She knows what she is talking about.
She is a recently retired professor of English. She is speaking for herself.
honest.abe
(8,685 posts)+1
mahina
(17,699 posts)Star Advertiser by Sophie Cocke? Its worth reading.
https://www.staradvertiser.com/2019/01/27/hawaii-news/butler-and-his-organization-criticize-the-press-decline-interviews/?HSA=72bb47cbf37cb9fee9ab9c8a2ca401668c4b4615
honest.abe
(8,685 posts)LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)LAS14
(13,783 posts)... she's very vulnerable to swift-boating. We need someone crispy clean, like Obama, so they have to resort to something as ridiculous as the birther campaign.
happybird
(4,627 posts)A fascinating read, very thorough, written by local Hawaiian journalist..
Freethinker65
(10,055 posts)Honestly, if you have the time, you should probably look at all of the candidates- Democratic, Republican, and Independent.
Truth is, unless you live in an early primary state, many of these early candidates will have already dropped out. That is how it works. One hopes that if their passions and political platforms resonate with voters they will either do well themselves or those ideas will be encorporated into those of other more viable candidates.
disillusioned73
(2,872 posts)we need outrage... outrage I tell ya!!!
Freethinker65
(10,055 posts)Bleacher Creature
(11,257 posts)Devil Child
(2,728 posts)Bettie
(16,126 posts)this one isn't one of my top five.
And that is fine. If people choose to vote for her, well, I guess they can. I doubt she'll be our nominee though.
Blue_Tires
(55,445 posts)Then there's that whole Assad-Putin thing...
There's more but I'll stop here for now
Callado119
(171 posts)Apollyonus
(812 posts)FrankBooth
(1,607 posts)Despite the OPs protestations.
In my opinion, this is a vanity campaign intended to raise her profile among conservative Dems/Indys and Fox News viewers. This rep has no support with party brass, suffers from a serious case of whataboutism, and will not finish in the top 5 in any primary outside of Hawaii.
But please, by all means, tell us all about her 'legit' candidacy ... for the 20th time in the last month.
BannonsLiver
(16,460 posts)Unintentional comedy at its finest.
Claritie Pixie
(2,199 posts)I don not find her trustworthy based on past actions and statements.
LongtimeAZDem
(4,494 posts)IronLionZion
(45,534 posts)obamanut2012
(26,142 posts)in2herbs
(2,947 posts)Hekate
(90,824 posts)...I'm the Queen of Rumania.
She's a very pretty face, raised in a highly authoritarian American cult (Hindu in name only), and groomed for what she's doing.
It is not "bashing a Dem" to point this out.
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)And that's not bashing a Dem because some Dems are proudly conservative, some are far-left or -right authoritarian, others are...uncategorizable. And in some cases perhaps all depending on the mood of the moment.
Squinch
(51,014 posts)on the lookout for two kinds of threads.
First, of course, are threads whose purpose is to sow division among us and set us at each other.
Second is threads that are designed as "honey traps." In these, a poster will start a thread that is obviously controversial, and then ask "innocent" questions of the responders in an effort to get them to say something negative that could get their post hidden. Its all quite skillfully done, but there are examples of this kind of ratfucking daily here.
Generally the same posters create both kinds of threads, so beware, DUers, and be safe out there.
LongtimeAZDem
(4,494 posts)Kingofalldems
(38,485 posts)sheshe2
(83,925 posts)obamanut2012
(26,142 posts)FSogol
(45,527 posts)Tommy_Carcetti
(43,198 posts)oberliner
(58,724 posts)If we all focus on highlighting the best of every Democrat running in 2020, then we can help stay united in ensuring that whoever wins the nomination gets full-throated support and eventual victory.
Let's stick to positive posts about the many talented Democrats that have thrown their hats into the ring this far. We can avoid division, stand united, and work together to ensure the success of our party.
Squinch
(51,014 posts)Hortensis
(58,785 posts)right stuff to be our national leader, though. Although we should not attack those who wear our party label, I disagree that we have a duty to "highlight the best" of those we believe have too little of that.
Fwiw, I also believe that encouraging all Democratic candidates who represent an extreme range of views is a luxury for safer times. The last time I felt even remotely that way was with Ralph Nader in 2000. After that dreadful electoral disaster, I didn't need losses in 2002, 2004, 2010, 2014, and 2016 to understand the problem. Not when whole nations are lost by razor-thin margins and whole populations are being manipulated by sophisticated IT techniques from right-wing enemies domestic and foreign.
Of course, we should continually educate ourselves about all candidates who choose to run under our label. New material to consider is frequently turned up. This January 14 Vanity Fair article, for instance, points out many questions but also has many links which connect readers with other sources who will continue digging for further information.
The Democratic candidates perplexing, Bannonesque foreign policy and passivity toward Assad may make her radioactive. And then there is the homophobia.
https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2019/01/tulsi-gabbard-2020-presidential-run
FSogol
(45,527 posts)marble falls
(57,240 posts)MrGrieves
(315 posts)I posted about this phenomenon in the help forum. There are a number of things that get posted here with the motives that you describe and you have to be careful in how you respond.
Recursion
(56,582 posts)I'd prefer not to trade one foreign puppet for another, thank you.
brooklynite
(94,737 posts)...but based on who I've seen so far, I think it'll be a hard sell.
Beakybird
(3,333 posts)She's on the bottom of my list, but I'd fight like a dog for her if she won the nomination.
brooklynite
(94,737 posts)I'm referring to choices for the nomination. I've met with Harris, Swalwell, Bullock and Hickenlooper (and I know Brown), so there are clearly better options.
John Fante
(3,479 posts)candidates in the field. IOW the candidates most likely to breed apathy in the Democratic base, thus ensuring a Trump victory.
How peculiar.
oberliner
(58,724 posts)I think the other Democratic candidates are also very good, but Harris is my #1 as of now.
Gothmog
(145,567 posts)This is a very interesting article https://www.politico.com/story/2019/01/29/tulsi-gabbard-2020-election-1134055
Two-and-a-half weeks after she told CNN she had decided to run for the White Housean announcement that even her own staff didn't know was coming, after weeks of debating the timing of the rolloutthe 37-year-old congresswoman has struggled to contain the chaos.
Campaign manager Rania Batrice and Gabbards consulting firm Revolution Messaging are set to depart after this weekends official kickoff in Hawaii, two sources familiar with the situation told POLITICO. Gabbard is leaning on her sister, Vrindavan, to fill the void.
Meanwhile, the congresswoman is under fire back home after picking a fight with Sen. Mazie Hirono, and a prominent Democratic state lawmaker is already challenging Gabbard in next years congressional primary. That means she faces the possibility of losing the presidential race and her House seat as well.
oberliner
(58,724 posts)pnwmom
(108,995 posts)if Tulsi's publicist, Chris Cooper of the Potomac Group, is placing these articles in university sites, or paying students to do so.
The named writer, Cameron Elder, isn't listed among the staff of the publication.
https://duclarion.com/staff-directory/
oberliner
(58,724 posts)I would think it would be unusual for her to be an editor in her first year at the school.
She has written about ten articles for the publication.
https://duclarion.com/author/cameronelder/
pnwmom
(108,995 posts)Because she doesn't seem very informed.
I thought it was interesting to read a young college student's take on one of the 2020 Democratic candidates.
UCmeNdc
(9,601 posts)She is a Joe Lieberman lite candidate.
oberliner
(58,724 posts)honest.abe
(8,685 posts)Dean: Tulsi Gabbard. I dont think she knows what shes doing and I dont think she should be qualified. Shes not qualified.
Link to tweet
disillusioned73
(2,872 posts)he's a lobbyist, and not on our side (anymore), if he ever was..
CNN also recently hired McCaskill for her "leftist" views( hilarious, I know).. and Flake also got a corporate news gig.. it seems "news" has an affinity for right wing talking points
honest.abe
(8,685 posts)Have I logged into Bizarrro World?
disillusioned73
(2,872 posts)it's crazy sometimes..
smb
(3,475 posts)I can hear the exact same "both parties are equally to blame" idiocy from any of a plethora of pundits.
Mojo2
(332 posts)Her campaign is already unraveling before it even really starts! Her campaign manager is leaving and her past statements leaning to the right views are surfacing. I have added her to the Sanders and Gillibrand column, of folks, that I will not support.
Pisces
(5,602 posts)liberalnarb
(4,532 posts)People need to be aware of her past.
DanTex
(20,709 posts)The only group of people I've seen her actually appeal to are the Bernie-or-Bust crowd from last primary season, who like her because she quit the DNC.
Other than that, there's not much there. And, she's got a bunch of unpleasant things in her political history, from anti-LGBT positions to Hindu nationalism to sort-of being an apologist for Assad.
I don't see her getting much mainstream Democratic support.
oberliner
(58,724 posts)DanTex
(20,709 posts)The lack of support here probably has a lot to do with her choice to join the "primaries were rigged" crowd in 2016, which is the same reason she has support from the JPR crowd.
And it's true that DU is not the Democratic Party as a whole, but she's alienated large swathes of the party outside of DU, not just with the DNC stunt, but also with Assad and other things, for example, comments blaming "both sides" for the recent shutdown, etc.
The question, to me, is what else does she have going for her besides giving the finger to the Democratic establishment? She's obviously trying to be a form of Bernie 2.0, but I don't see it. Even a fair number of people on the left (e.g. Sam Seder) have suspicions about her apparent sympathies for people like Modi and Assad. Also, given that one of the "standard knocks" on Bernie-type candidates is that they prioritize economic issues over social issues, her anti-LGBT past is not going to play well.
Unlike someone like AOC, who does have the potential to someday become Bernie 2.0, I don't see Gabbard as having much appeal outside of people who simply dislike the Democratic Party.
Javaman
(62,534 posts)Gothmog
(145,567 posts)Vinca
(50,304 posts)as the primaries wind down and I doubt Tulsi will be among them.
Long odds for sure.
But stranger things have happened.