Russia's RT condemns "toxic" US media coverage of Schultz and Gabbard

[Yosemito]

They're in the Schultz bandwagon now too, not surprisingly because he's been attacking Democrats almost exclusively.

All candidates face scrutiny and an airing of their skeletons, but not only has she received less airtime than fellow relative novices Cory Booker and Kamala Harris, but the overall coverage of Gabbard has been uncharacteristically toxic, perhaps comparable only to the Democratic ostracism of Howard Schultz, following the former Starbucks CEO’s unbidden decision to enter the race.

https://www.rt.com/news/450513-tulsi-gabbard-nbc-media-demonization/

[Shell_Seas]

1. Oh, well, if RT says so....

[marble falls]

2. Who gives a fucking shit what RT's got to say about anything.

[Docreed2003]

9. This...all of this!!

[BumRushDaShow]

3. RT?

[NewJeffCT]

4. So, the media may be getting it right

for once if they're being criticized over Gabbard and Schultz

[Initech]

5. I'd like to tell RT where they can go shove it.

[still_one]

6. Let me understand this, it isn't because Democrats don't want Schultz and Gabbard, it is because the

media is treating them badly

RT better be careful or they will expose themselves for what they really are, A propaganda mouth piece for Putin

[lark]

7. Which just tells me Russia is supporting these asses.

[FakeNoose]

8. Really makes me wonder why they're (presumably) supporting these two?

Maybe Putin's media network is implying that Trump is going down in 2020.

[DFW]

10. While they're at it.....

They may as well complain about the unjustly harsh treatment of Joseph McCarthy in our history books.

[at140]

11. With Schultz in a 3-way race, the poll says...

?itok=_nJJ3wvy×tamp=1549133319