Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsHow markets have performed under the past 6 Presidents in one graph

Full article here:
https://www.cnn.com/interactive/2019/business/stock-market-by-president/index.html?utm_content=2019-02-04T15%3A00%3A09&utm_source=twCNNp&utm_term=image&utm_medium=social
8 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
How markets have performed under the past 6 Presidents in one graph (Original Post)
scheming daemons
Feb 2019
OP
Investors - if you want to lose money, elect a republican! clear as day.
NRaleighLiberal
Feb 2019
#1
NRaleighLiberal
(61,937 posts)1. Investors - if you want to lose money, elect a republican! clear as day.
scheming daemons
(25,487 posts)2. Absolutely
csziggy
(34,189 posts)6. Somebody once told me "To live like a Republican, elect Democrats"
Since Democratic administrations are better overall for the country and for business, this seems to hold true.
ProudLib72
(17,984 posts)3. He hasn't had enough time
I bet with another four years he could beat W's low score by a lot.
MichMan
(17,603 posts)4. I wonder what the results would be if you looked at who controlled congress
Would it look similar ?
Blue_true
(31,261 posts)5. Democratic Presidents would likely open up a larger margin if they had a democratic Congress.
I just don't know why democrats don't shout it from rooftops, but for the last 117 years, the economy under a democratic President out performed that of the republican they replaced, every single time.
progressoid
(53,529 posts)7. That's great for debating with republicans
But we need to address the issue that nearly half of America will get no benefit from this since they have no investments. And that most of these gains go to the already wealthy.
smirkymonkey
(63,221 posts)8. K&R
And bookmarked!