General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsIt's about fried chicken
Senator Gillibrand -- at a rally in SC -- asked an aide if she should eat fried chicken with a fork or her fingers . . . the decision was fingers.
Then -- the Twitter universe went batshit because she asked a perfectly reasonable question.
No one seems to be concerned about this:

BigmanPigman
(54,533 posts)an issue so ignore them. It is more BS that is meaningless.
RockRaven
(18,620 posts)then using utensils instead of their fingers is quite pragmatic no matter how elitist or prissy or effete it might seem BECAUSE THEY ARE SHAKING EVERYONE'S HANDS. Forgetting for a minute the health of the candidate, who shook 20, or 50, or 100 people's hands on their way into the establishment,... do you want to shake the hand of someone who just ate fried chicken, before they've had a chance to wash them? You like a greasy handshake? Really?
CentralMass
(16,837 posts)knife and a fork a crime.
People take their fried chicken very seriousely in the south .
no_hypocrisy
(54,123 posts)jcmaine72
(1,843 posts)I'd advise him to eat a bucket of fried chicken every day and wash it down with two quarts of buttermilk.
Sancho
(9,173 posts)First, if it's a bunch of guys or informal family, anything goes...
but if you are at some kind of formal, debutant, wedding thing, "the only time you use your fingers are shrimp with tails and small sandwiches on trays". Frankly, if dinner is KFC you are already in the "anything goes" category! Of course you may need to save the buckets and clean them up to pass around at revivals.
I don't know if it's just the South, but we had some interesting rules from Dad too:
"You can drink (alcohol) at any age if there's no woman within 50 miles who knows you."