Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsAnn Coulter Loses it on Trump Over Funding Deal: 'IT'S OVER IF HE SIGNS THIS BILL!'
by Caleb Ecarma | Feb 14th, 2019, 4:24 pm
Right-wing pundit Ann Coulter condemned President Donald Trumps apparently imminent decision to sign a government funding bill includes a fraction of what he demanded for his border wall, saying his presidency is over if he agrees to the deal.
Link to tweet
Coulter has continually acted as one of Trumps chief media critics during the wall funding debate alongside the Drudge Report and Rush Limbaugh and her comments have helped pressure the president into keeping the government shutdown for many weeks that he did.
After an afternoon of uncertainty in Washington Thursday, White House press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders finally informed lawmakers that Trump will agree to the bill: President Trump will sign the government funding bill, and as he has stated before, he will also take other executive action including a national emergency to ensure we stop the national security and humanitarian crisis at the border.
more
https://www.mediaite.com/online/ann-coulter-loses-it-over-funding-deal-its-over-if-he-signs-this-bill/
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
20 replies, 1614 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (6)
ReplyReply to this post
20 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Ann Coulter Loses it on Trump Over Funding Deal: 'IT'S OVER IF HE SIGNS THIS BILL!' (Original Post)
DonViejo
Feb 2019
OP
Why does Bill Maher want to legitimize that hateful phobic bigoted racist harpy?
NurseJackie
Feb 2019
#11
But doesn't she just bite their heads off after she mates with them?
The Velveteen Ocelot
Feb 2019
#7
Tweety asked what is it that Coulter does to scare the beejesus out of Trump!
riversedge
Feb 2019
#19
Eliot Rosewater
(31,121 posts)1. Watched her recently, she truly hates, deeply hates all Brown people.
Like most modern day cons, she is a violent racist.
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)11. Why does Bill Maher want to legitimize that hateful phobic bigoted racist harpy?
He hems and haws and couches his reasoning by saying 'well, she's a newsmaker' ... but that's the moral equivalent of Trumps "both sides" arguments and justification.
That woman should be shunned and completely shut-out.
eleny
(46,166 posts)2. It'll be over for her influence
No wonder she's frantic with all caps.
Blue Owl
(50,494 posts)3. And she should know a thing or two about being "over"
mshasta
(2,108 posts)4. break up with trump
on valentines day...how sweet
The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,836 posts)7. But doesn't she just bite their heads off after she mates with them?
wryter2000
(46,081 posts)14. DUzy
How I wish we still had them.
imanamerican63
(13,812 posts)5. She going back home to her mothership!
Thekaspervote
(32,793 posts)6. Good..let her spill her vile hate to dotard land
TheCowsCameHome
(40,168 posts)8. ...and then she'll kiss his big ass, right along with Hannity
She is such a fraud.
underpants
(182,877 posts)9. Limbaugh too
https://www.democraticunderground.com/100211819209
But, folks, it is horrible. This deal is horrible from the standpoint that it totally, totally blows to smithereens the entire concept of border security.
This bill is exactly what you get when you have two parties that both essentially want open borders. Its basically what this is. There arent a whole lot of members of Congress that wear Make America Great Again hats. There arent a whole lot of members of Congress who are part of the Trump coalition. Its predominantly a Democrat bill, but its got plenty of Republican support and it is very, very explicit on what cannot be done regarding building the wall or funding the wall or continuing construction for the wall.
The $1.375 billion number is accurate. It even goes so far as to describe what kind of fencing it can and cannot be, what kind of wall it can and cannot be, where it can and cannot be. I mean it really is a piece of legislation that looks at the president and goes (raspberry) you. But its not gonna change, given the makeup of Congress, the fact Democrats won the House. It isnt gonna change. And I really dont think shutting down the government would force a change in this.
Im more convinced than ever that one of the strategeries I laid out yesterday and one of the ways the White House is probably thinking about it is more than ever now the way to go. From now until 2020 there is never gonna be any legislative support for what Donald Trump wants to do in practically any area of his agenda. Not with the Democrats running the House. There isnt gonna be any compromise possible. There isnt gonna be any cooperation. There isnt gonna be any working together.
But, folks, it is horrible. This deal is horrible from the standpoint that it totally, totally blows to smithereens the entire concept of border security.
This bill is exactly what you get when you have two parties that both essentially want open borders. Its basically what this is. There arent a whole lot of members of Congress that wear Make America Great Again hats. There arent a whole lot of members of Congress who are part of the Trump coalition. Its predominantly a Democrat bill, but its got plenty of Republican support and it is very, very explicit on what cannot be done regarding building the wall or funding the wall or continuing construction for the wall.
The $1.375 billion number is accurate. It even goes so far as to describe what kind of fencing it can and cannot be, what kind of wall it can and cannot be, where it can and cannot be. I mean it really is a piece of legislation that looks at the president and goes (raspberry) you. But its not gonna change, given the makeup of Congress, the fact Democrats won the House. It isnt gonna change. And I really dont think shutting down the government would force a change in this.
Im more convinced than ever that one of the strategeries I laid out yesterday and one of the ways the White House is probably thinking about it is more than ever now the way to go. From now until 2020 there is never gonna be any legislative support for what Donald Trump wants to do in practically any area of his agenda. Not with the Democrats running the House. There isnt gonna be any compromise possible. There isnt gonna be any cooperation. There isnt gonna be any working together.
John Fante
(3,479 posts)12. Looks like he picked the wrong week to quit the hillbilly heroin.
Cha
(297,655 posts)10. I think the Magats would
still go to trump's rallies.. and vote for the traitor.
When is he suppose to sign? Anyone know? Thanks!
wryter2000
(46,081 posts)13. She truly needs to get over herself
Does anyone listen to her anymore?
world wide wally
(21,754 posts)15. Trump seems to be pretty low in the pecking order.
People over him include Putin
Rush Limbaugh
Ann Coulter
Sean Hannity
Tucker Carlson
And all of his donors.
He is small potatoes.
spanone
(135,873 posts)16. Is annie breaking up with donnie?
Oh my....and on Valentines Day...
dlk
(11,576 posts)17. Does Coulter Know What s Veto-Proof Majority Is?
riversedge
(70,299 posts)18. Tweety show talking about her-and other fox news characters right now.
riversedge
(70,299 posts)19. Tweety asked what is it that Coulter does to scare the beejesus out of Trump!
HipChick
(25,485 posts)20. If he would let Joy speak..