Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BlueinOhio

(238 posts)
Wed Aug 22, 2012, 09:22 PM Aug 2012

Poll predicted last elections accurately

http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2012/08/22/election-model-with-100-success-rate-predicts-romney-victory/
Poll predicts a Romney win unless the economy improves. We all know the GOP will do everything in thier power to make sure there is no improvement. Is this the excuse they will use win they hack the voting machines?
11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

99Forever

(14,524 posts)
5. I've seen two.
Wed Aug 22, 2012, 09:31 PM
Aug 2012

Both were started by newbies with under 100 posts.

Make of that what you will.

 

MrSlayer

(22,143 posts)
3. Most people simply do not pay attention.
Wed Aug 22, 2012, 09:29 PM
Aug 2012

If everyone objectively looked at what has been going in in Washington the past four years there is no way this would even be close. There is no way we would have gotten trounced in 2010.

But they don't and we're in serious trouble here. Serious trouble indeed.

 

Dkc05

(375 posts)
6. I think the poll is a fraud
Wed Aug 22, 2012, 09:32 PM
Aug 2012

Don't panic let's just work hard to get people out to vote on election dayI I think the poll is a fraud

samsingh

(18,471 posts)
7. if it predicted a bush win in 2000 and 2004, then it is clearly wrong
Wed Aug 22, 2012, 09:34 PM
Aug 2012

2000 was definitely a Gore win. 2004 was likely stolen in Ohio

CJCRANE

(18,184 posts)
8. It's a "postdiction" model, as mentioned in the other threads.
Wed Aug 22, 2012, 09:39 PM
Aug 2012

They looked back and analysed the data to find the commonalities. They didn't predict anything.

You could use different data points to get a different result.

longship

(40,416 posts)
9. Rubbish. Data mining and post hoc ergo propter hoc.
Wed Aug 22, 2012, 10:17 PM
Aug 2012

This is like taking stock market data, looking for correlations and then announcing that you can predict the future stock market by the correlates.

This is a monumental statistical fallacy.

Correlation does not imply causation.

Enough with these bullshit threads.

You might as well correlate the election to the zodiac signs. I am sure their are correlations with the numerological elements of the year number.

Kick in to the DU tip jar?

This week we're running a special pop-up mini fund drive. From Monday through Friday we're going ad-free for all registered members, and we're asking you to kick in to the DU tip jar to support the site and keep us financially healthy.

As a bonus, making a contribution will allow you to leave kudos for another DU member, and at the end of the week we'll recognize the DUers who you think make this community great.

Tell me more...

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Poll predicted last elect...