Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsAbsence of evidence does not equal evidence of absence.
Despite what Ken Delanian was implying (in his first breathless reports), the fact that the Manafort sentencing agreement lacks evidence about Trump/Russian collusion doesn't mean there wasn't any.
All it means is that such evidence is not included in this particular document. But it didn't need to be. This is a sentencing document and all it had to do was justify Manafort's sentence.
5 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Absence of evidence does not equal evidence of absence. (Original Post)
pnwmom
Feb 2019
OP
Not bad journalism. It's lack of journalism; it's PROPAGANDA to keep tRumpanzees shuffling along. nt
Bernardo de La Paz
Feb 2019
#5
benld74
(10,269 posts)1. Twitter is raking him over the coals
The idea that we'd pretend these three possibilities are *equally possible* when we know Manafort secretly offered in-kind value to the Kremlin during the campaignoffered it to both Kilimnik (GRU) and Deripaska (Kremlin)in exchange for "getting whole" is *really bad journalism*
Link to tweet
pnwmom
(110,216 posts)4. Good post. Thanks!
Bernardo de La Paz
(60,320 posts)5. Not bad journalism. It's lack of journalism; it's PROPAGANDA to keep tRumpanzees shuffling along. nt
