Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsCohen gives House Intel new docs w/edits by Trump lawyers to his false Trump Tower Moscow testimony
Manu Raju @mkrajuNEW: Michael Cohen gives House Intel new docs showing edits by Trump attorneys to false written statement he delivered to Congress in 2017 about the Trump Organization's pursuit of the Trump Tower Moscow project into the 2016 campaign season w/@jeremyherb
Link to tweet
Link to tweet
15 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Cohen gives House Intel new docs w/edits by Trump lawyers to his false Trump Tower Moscow testimony (Original Post)
bigtree
Mar 2019
OP
Does anyone know if the SDNY can share documents with the House committee?
Glimmer of Hope
Mar 2019
#15
Claritie Pixie
(2,199 posts)1. Very good! Proof that Trump's legal counsel told him to lie.
malaise
(296,118 posts)2. Oh My!
Get thee to the greatest page.
Six new checks as well.
Groper Don the Con is up shit creek without a paddle.
lunatica
(53,410 posts)3. Well that's damning!
So Sad!
LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)4. So it was trump's lawyers who edited the statements.
That's gonna make a lot of people really sad.
Bless their hearts.
Delmette2.0
(4,505 posts)11. Which ones? Trump has so many.
Arazi
(8,887 posts)12. Sekulow and Lowell is who Cohen names at the open hearing
Delmette2.0
(4,505 posts)13. Ohhh, thanks.
stonecutter357
(13,045 posts)6. K&R
duforsure
(11,885 posts)7. Cohen has delivered the goods once again
And its just really getting started.
UpInArms
(54,984 posts)8. Subornation of perjury
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Subornation_of_perjury
In American law, Scots law, and under the laws of some English-speaking Commonwealth nations, subornation of perjury is the crime of persuading a person to commit perjury, which is the swearing of a false oath to tell the truth in a legal proceeding, whether spoken or written.
Contents
U.S. Law
Edit
In American federal law, Title 18 U.S.C. § 1622 provides:
Whoever procures another to commit any perjury is guilty of subornation of perjury, and shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both.
The term subornation of perjury further describes the circumstance wherein an attorney at law causes a client to lie under oath or, allows another party to lie under oath.[1][2]
In California law, per the state bar code,[3] the subornation of perjury constitutes an act of "moral turpitude" on the part of the attorney, and thus, is cause for his or her disbarment, or for the suspension of his or her license to practice law.[4]
Contents
U.S. Law
Edit
In American federal law, Title 18 U.S.C. § 1622 provides:
Whoever procures another to commit any perjury is guilty of subornation of perjury, and shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both.
The term subornation of perjury further describes the circumstance wherein an attorney at law causes a client to lie under oath or, allows another party to lie under oath.[1][2]
In California law, per the state bar code,[3] the subornation of perjury constitutes an act of "moral turpitude" on the part of the attorney, and thus, is cause for his or her disbarment, or for the suspension of his or her license to practice law.[4]
lindysalsagal
(22,915 posts)9. This. Is. His. Downfall.
No way of avoiding "Intent to deceive."
stuffmatters
(2,580 posts)10. This is so great
Evolve Dammit
(21,777 posts)14. "Take 'em down" Dropkick Murphys
Glimmer of Hope
(5,823 posts)15. Does anyone know if the SDNY can share documents with the House committee?
I assumed the SDNY scanned what they collected and now have electronic versions of the documents. I don't understand this digging by Cohen and the suitcases of documents. This is pretty old school and inefficient.