Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
14 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I don't care what anyone says... Ellis was bought off (Original Post) Rustyeye77 Mar 2019 OP
Or possibly threatened.... lindysalsagal Mar 2019 #1
He's a member of "the club"...nt 2naSalit Mar 2019 #2
Right, that's all it takes. elleng Mar 2019 #3
+1! Chin music Mar 2019 #6
No and no. Bernardo de La Paz Mar 2019 #4
You're exactly right SCantiGOP Mar 2019 #13
What's the evidence of that, besides the light sentence? The Velveteen Ocelot Mar 2019 #5
He doesn't need to be bought off. He's shit. He thinks wealthy white conservatives are good people. manor321 Mar 2019 #7
His conservative ideology probably explains the light sentence Cicada Mar 2019 #8
Got any evidence? PJMcK Mar 2019 #9
These guys don't pay for stuff people are giving away for free. RockRaven Mar 2019 #10
I bet he watches Fox EndGOPPropaganda Mar 2019 #11
Lawrence Tribe would say he's "unfit for the bench." ancianita Mar 2019 #12
Ellis has a history of opposing long mandatory minimum sentences, FWIW. The Velveteen Ocelot Mar 2019 #14

elleng

(130,767 posts)
3. Right, that's all it takes.
Thu Mar 7, 2019, 10:17 PM
Mar 2019

Doesn't need $$$, As of 2018, federal district judges are paid $208,000 a year, circuit judges $220,600, Associate Justices of the Supreme Court $255,300 and the Chief Justice of the United States $267,000. All were permitted to earn a maximum of an additional $21,000 a year for teaching.

Bernardo de La Paz

(48,966 posts)
4. No and no.
Thu Mar 7, 2019, 10:17 PM
Mar 2019

1) It is a ridiculous sentence, not rediculous. Much too short.

2) A ruling that doesn't go your way is not evidence that somebody is corrupt. In this case, I think it is white privilege and rich privilege that are swaying the Judge.

The Velveteen Ocelot

(115,614 posts)
5. What's the evidence of that, besides the light sentence?
Thu Mar 7, 2019, 10:18 PM
Mar 2019

If Ellis had been bought off he might have granted a defense motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict and set Manafort free - which he could have done - instead of sending him to prison for four years, don't you think?

Cicada

(4,533 posts)
8. His conservative ideology probably explains the light sentence
Thu Mar 7, 2019, 10:33 PM
Mar 2019

He was appointed by Reagan. I think he is driven by his far right political views.

PJMcK

(21,998 posts)
9. Got any evidence?
Thu Mar 7, 2019, 10:34 PM
Mar 2019

Your charge is outrageously inflammatory! And "ridiculous" does not have an "e" in it.

In any event, I disagree with the sentence Judge Ellis imposed. My personal belief is the sentence should have been about double for these crimes. His Honor's commentaries during the trial-- many of which he later had to retract-- demonstrated his personal and possibly political bias.

Nonetheless, Manafort will spend a significant amount of his 70s in prison. He has no future. He's finished. And let's not forget the Russians he's screwed over.

The traitor will likely die in the can. That gives me a bit of faith in our flawed system.

RockRaven

(14,912 posts)
10. These guys don't pay for stuff people are giving away for free.
Thu Mar 7, 2019, 10:36 PM
Mar 2019

He is ideologically pre-disposed towards letting Manafort off. He WANTED to let him off easy, just on his own, no pay-off needed.

The Velveteen Ocelot

(115,614 posts)
14. Ellis has a history of opposing long mandatory minimum sentences, FWIW.
Thu Mar 7, 2019, 10:39 PM
Mar 2019
In April, confronted by a 28-year-old armed robbery convict facing a mandatory minimum 82-year sentence, Ellis' frustration grew so intense that he balked at imposing what he called a "very severe" sentence. Instead, the judge recruited a high-powered law firm to scour the law in search of some way to avoid imposing what is effectively a life sentence on Lamont Gaines, who was convicted of a string of robberies of 7-11 stores and a check-cashing business.

The judge appointed Daniel Suleiman, a former aide to Attorney General Eric Holder, to come up with any argument that might help Gaines win a more lenient sentence. Suleiman, a partner at Covington & Burling, set on one possibility: a Supreme Court ruling in April that invalidated a law very similar to the one requiring the lengthy sentence for Gaines.
https://www.politico.com/blogs/under-the-radar/2018/07/06/t-s-ellis-mandatory-minimum-sentences-697826
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»I don't care what anyone ...