General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsIf Texas turns Blue....
What will the Texas haters do?
Yes, I'm from Fort Worth. Lived in Texas for 58 years.
Laura PourMeADrink
(42,770 posts)different people are in Austin, Dallas, San Antonio and Houston/Galveston and I suppose El Paso compared to the rest.
TwilightZone
(25,471 posts)The major cities and the Valley have gone blue the past several elections, and the suburbs are shifting significantly.
Dem turnout (and, particularly, Latino turnout) here is below the national average or it would be even closer. We're working on it.
dalton99a
(81,475 posts)Laura PourMeADrink
(42,770 posts)numbers - but not the good kind. We're getting people who want less government and less taxes and easier gun shooting environment.
Laura PourMeADrink
(42,770 posts)Facebook - or what KLBJ liberals in afternoon call Mombook - with falsehoods about Beto.
I saw it spread. It's the only "news" low infos here get. And then he plateaued.
But, hell, how to you combat that? I can't answer them because they are my husband's wingnut clients.
I think Biden would have the best shot. Maybe with Beto. Or, maybe Castro as VP could whip up Hispanic vote?
If we got Texas, we could lose one or all of the big three Trussia probably stole - WI, MI and PA
StTimofEdenRoc
(445 posts)Laura PourMeADrink
(42,770 posts)Laura PourMeADrink
(42,770 posts)want no stinking wall.
If Dipshit starts taking land - all bets are off.
StTimofEdenRoc
(445 posts)Laura PourMeADrink
(42,770 posts)with stories about border landowners trump is stealing land from. And flood facebook with dem ads - targeted to wingnuts.
StTimofEdenRoc
(445 posts)They should require it be spent in TX, just to stir up shite.
Gothmog
(145,176 posts)Texas is going to turn blue. trump may have accelerated the process
MicaelS
(8,747 posts)Gothmog
(145,176 posts)trump may just accelerate the process
There are a ton of real Democrats in Texas working hard to turn Texas blue. I was on the phone with a friend who lost her run for Texas Supreme Court to a judge who was just put on the federal bench. She will be running in 2020 for that seat. This will be fun
MicaelS
(8,747 posts)Hortensis
(58,785 posts)I imagine whatever she went through with the prior run all just became more than worthwhile.
dem4decades
(11,288 posts)And he is despicable.
If Texas turns blue I'll come down the and give you all a big kiss.
Laura PourMeADrink
(42,770 posts)during Beto campaign. People so stupid they just saw R
TexasTowelie
(112,153 posts)There were also the low-information voters that were influenced by the candidate's surname.
If you examine the county maps from the 2018 primary you will see that Sema Hernandez was strongest in the RGV and other areas with a large concentration of Hispanic voters even though she was virtually unknown outside of the El Paso area and a few enclaves in Houston where she had worked. I suspect that most of those voters were not aware that she is a DSA member. It looks like the only county that has a four-year university where Hernandez had a plurality was Webb County (Texas A&M International - Laredo). Most of the counties where Hernandez did well don't even have a junior college.
It seems that low-information voters are guided by two factors--the political party of the candidate and the ethnicity of the candidate within the party they favor. It's not my intention to be divisive, but to be observant instead.
StTimofEdenRoc
(445 posts)bearsfootball516
(6,377 posts)Cruz is universally dislothed, even by Texans. They only vote for him because hes got an R. Cornyn is a lot more popular than Cruz and hell get a lot of straight party votes that stayed home in 2018 because they hated Cruz and Trump wasnt on the ballot.
StTimofEdenRoc
(445 posts)StTimofEdenRoc
(445 posts)maybe a few visits to AZ where the senate race will be a hot one.
lame54
(35,287 posts)MicaelS
(8,747 posts)Last edited Sat Mar 9, 2019, 11:53 PM - Edit history (1)
IOW, I did not get the fucking joke.
n/t
Iggo
(47,552 posts)TexasTowelie
(112,153 posts)Even one of the most liberal sites I read on occasion has questioned the wisdom of not contesting the race in Texas.
The top Democratic Party establishment SuperPAC, Priorities USA, has decided that Ohio, Iowa and Texas will not be target states for 2020. What a dumb-ass move! Their new report lists 15 states and puts them in prioritization categories. The top priorities will be Florida, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, Michigan, New Hampshire and Nevada. Next down are Arizona, North Carolina and Georgia. That's followed by Minnesota, Virginia and Colorado as Democratic "watch states" and Iowa, Ohio and Texas as Republican "watch states."
They plan to invest $100 in an early engagement program in Wisconsin, Florida, Pennsylvania and Michigan, which they will expand to include New Hampshire, North Carolina, Georgia, Nevada and Arizona. They have no plans for Texas (38 electoral votes and half a dozen vulnerable House seats and a possible vulnerable Senate seat), Ohio (18 electoral votes) or Iowa (6 electoral votes).
http://downwithtyranny.blogspot.com/2019/03/democratic-establishment-clowns-already.html
Considering that Democratic candidates come to Texas to exploit the strong fund-raising base in this state, we get very little in return from the party in return. That has to stop if we ever expect to elect enough Democrats to have super-majorities necessary to overturn vetoes and filibusters.
Iggo
(47,552 posts)Right?
And yeah it was.
"What'll the Texas haters do now?"
"Forget the Alamo."
Ba-dump, psh!
TexasTowelie
(112,153 posts)but I'm not ready to surrender. I don't believe that we should give up on any state.
Laura PourMeADrink
(42,770 posts)We need new party leaders
Afromania
(2,768 posts)Iggo
(47,552 posts)That's about it.
StTimofEdenRoc
(445 posts)Adrahil
(13,340 posts)But not likely for a couple cycles.
Wellstone ruled
(34,661 posts)said in 1964 with the passing of the Voting Rights Law. The Democratic Party will lose the South and Texas for fifty years. Well,we are in year 54 and times are changing.
TexasTowelie
(112,153 posts)It would be nice if the national party saw that this state is winnable for Democrats if they make the financial investment.
Wellstone ruled
(34,661 posts)putting our money where our mouth is. O'Rouke woke up a sleeping giant and now it is ready to roar.
GulfCoast66
(11,949 posts)Comes with being the 3rd most populous state and getting the craziest people from up north.
Ive learned to generally laugh at it.
jmowreader
(50,557 posts)What I DO know: If Texas goes blue there will never be a Republican president again.
In the 2016 election, the electoral vote count was Trump 306-232 Clinton. Flipping Texas blue - while keeping everything else the way it was - gives us Clinton 270-268 Trump.
DFW
(54,370 posts)We still "talk funny," after all. There's always that.........
Captain Stern
(2,201 posts)There will still be plenty of other states they can hate (and the people in them), and feel good about it.
The Carolina's, Georgia, Alabama, Mississippi, Louisiana, and let's not forget Florida. And, they'll have Kansas, Missouri, Nebraska, Arkansas, and both Dakota's to fall back on when we start winning over the southern states.
"Argle Bargle!...Let' em SECEDE, I say....Welfare States!....Murmur, Murmur!