Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsDid the UK govt up to late 1800s forbid the reporting of Parliament's activities?
Years ago I saw this mentioned.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 477 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (0)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Did the UK govt up to late 1800s forbid the reporting of Parliament's activities? (Original Post)
bobbieinok
Mar 2019
OP
DavidDvorkin
(19,485 posts)1. Charles Dickens began his career as a Parliamentary reporter
Sitting in the galleries and recording what was done. His reports were printed in the newspapers. That would have been during the first half of the 19th century.
Or possibly my memory is completely shot.
I did a Goggle search for the question you asked, but I couldn't find anything.
empedocles
(15,751 posts)2. Interesting
muriel_volestrangler
(101,361 posts)3. Up until the late 18th century:
Another means of intimidating the press was
for the parliamentary authorities to enforce
its order against the publication of debates.
In February 1771, the Commons summoned
two newspaper printers to the bar and,
when they failed to appear, ordered their
arrest. However, the printersprotected by
Wilkes and his supporterssought refuge in
the City of London, where the magistrates
insisted that only City officials could make
arrests within its jurisdiction. For refusing
its orders to hand over the printers, the
Commons then imprisoned two of the City
magistrates, the Lord Mayor Brass Crosby
(172593) and Alderman Richard Oliver
(173584), who were both MPs, in the Tower
of London. However, public opinion was
on the side of the newspapers and political
stalemate was reached. When Crosby and
Olivers confinement lapsed at the end of
the parliamentary session that summer, the
Commons tacitly conceded defeat, finding itself
effectively powerless to control the publication
of its debates. Wilkes was apparently ready to
provoke a similar confrontation with the Lords
a few years later, but the challenge proved
unnecessary. The ban on strangers meant that
there were few further newspaper reports of
either House during the rest of that Parliament.
Once the next Parliament met in 1774,
parliamentary reporting in the newspapers
expanded very rapidly. Newspaper coverage
of the Irish Parliament began at the same time
and expanded just as quickly as in Britain.
https://www.parliament.uk/documents/lords-library/History-of-Hansard.pdf
for the parliamentary authorities to enforce
its order against the publication of debates.
In February 1771, the Commons summoned
two newspaper printers to the bar and,
when they failed to appear, ordered their
arrest. However, the printersprotected by
Wilkes and his supporterssought refuge in
the City of London, where the magistrates
insisted that only City officials could make
arrests within its jurisdiction. For refusing
its orders to hand over the printers, the
Commons then imprisoned two of the City
magistrates, the Lord Mayor Brass Crosby
(172593) and Alderman Richard Oliver
(173584), who were both MPs, in the Tower
of London. However, public opinion was
on the side of the newspapers and political
stalemate was reached. When Crosby and
Olivers confinement lapsed at the end of
the parliamentary session that summer, the
Commons tacitly conceded defeat, finding itself
effectively powerless to control the publication
of its debates. Wilkes was apparently ready to
provoke a similar confrontation with the Lords
a few years later, but the challenge proved
unnecessary. The ban on strangers meant that
there were few further newspaper reports of
either House during the rest of that Parliament.
Once the next Parliament met in 1774,
parliamentary reporting in the newspapers
expanded very rapidly. Newspaper coverage
of the Irish Parliament began at the same time
and expanded just as quickly as in Britain.
https://www.parliament.uk/documents/lords-library/History-of-Hansard.pdf
bobbieinok
(12,858 posts)4. Thanks very much for this link! I seem to have remembered wrong century.