Is AG Barr trustworthy?

[uppityperson]

For me, no. I want to see the report and hear from Pelosi.

[SHRED]

1. Hell no

[trueblue2007]

2. NO NO A MILLION TIMES NO. He is as corrupt and criminal as they come. He is Rump's Boy.

[RandySF]

3. No

That was clear before he was confirmed.

[uponit7771]

4. Hell to the naw

[MineralMan]

5. Nope.

[Jarqui]

6. He went along with the pardoning of Iran Contra criminals

I've been down on him since Trump nominated him.

[emulatorloo]

7. No, and his little "book report" isn't acceptable

Pelosi, Nadler and Schiff aren’t taking Barr’s “word” at face value either.

[walkingman]

8. It's simple - release the entire report.

[ananda]

9. No. We already knew that.

That's why he was appointed.

[keith sw]

10. Never

He covered for Reagan and Bush as well

[Glimmer of Hope]

11. No. We need the report.

[CentralMass]

12. No.

[Hoyt]

13. We can read the report over and over; but, unless Barr lied, Mueller couldn't conclude whether it

was obstruction -- leaving it up to Barr and Rosenstein.

The report will come out, there is no way obstructors can stop that long-term. It will list a bunch of unethical, immoral, maybe illegal stuff trump (or more likely, people on his behalf) did. But in the end -- Mueller left it ambiguous enough that Barr could deem the evidence as not arising to obstruction. If he thought it was obstruction, he should have said exactly that, so Barr or anyone else couldn't arrive at their own conclusion.

[uppityperson]

17. So your answer to my OP question is yes.

[Paladin]

14. Fuck no. (nt)

[Azathoth]

15. Of course not. But he's not going to lie about something that can be subpoenaed

And he's not going to lie about conferring with Rosenstein and him agreeing the evidence didn't support prosecution.

I'm sure there are plenty of details in the report that Congress can make hay over. But the broad contours are most likely as Barr described them.

The criminal justice part of this controversy is over.

[Meowmee]

16. No and we knew that already. Nt