Wed Mar 27, 2019, 02:36 PM
saljr1 (241 posts)
The Democrats in Congress should not screw around with Barr on the release of the Mueller Report
|
31 replies, 3992 views
 31 replies |
Author | Time | Post |
 The Democrats in Congress should not screw around with Barr on the release of the Mueller Report (Original post) |
saljr1 | Mar 2019 | OP |
| donkeypoofed | Mar 2019 | #1 | |
| saljr1 | Mar 2019 | #5 | |
| at140 | Mar 2019 | #2 | |
| AdamGG | Mar 2019 | #19 | |
| Laura PourMeADrink | Mar 2019 | #22 | |
| at140 | Mar 2019 | #26 | |
| Laura PourMeADrink | Mar 2019 | #28 | |
| Kurt V. | Mar 2019 | #27 | |
| RKP5637 | Mar 2019 | #3 | |
| FakeNoose | Mar 2019 | #18 | |
| RKP5637 | Mar 2019 | #21 | |
| LastLiberal in PalmSprings | Mar 2019 | #4 | |
| ut oh | Mar 2019 | #13 | |
| Laura PourMeADrink | Mar 2019 | #29 | |
| Botany | Mar 2019 | #6 | |
| uponit7771 | Mar 2019 | #9 | |
| ut oh | Mar 2019 | #14 | |
| Laura PourMeADrink | Mar 2019 | #30 | |
| Botany | Mar 2019 | #31 | |
| defacto7 | Mar 2019 | #7 | |
| Chipper Chat | Mar 2019 | #11 | |
| defacto7 | Mar 2019 | #12 | |
| Saviolo | Mar 2019 | #8 | |
| Jarqui | Mar 2019 | #10 | |
| Laura PourMeADrink | Mar 2019 | #23 | |
| ehrnst | Mar 2019 | #15 | |
| paleotn | Mar 2019 | #16 | |
| ehrnst | Mar 2019 | #17 | |
| AdamGG | Mar 2019 | #20 | |
| Laura PourMeADrink | Mar 2019 | #24 | |
| DeminPennswoods | Mar 2019 | #25 |
Response to saljr1 (Original post)
Wed Mar 27, 2019, 02:38 PM
1. Surprised they haven't subpoenaed Mueller to read his report aloud
Response to donkeypoofed (Reply #1)
Wed Mar 27, 2019, 02:59 PM
saljr1 (241 posts)
5. I agree, only Mueller can explain why he deferred on obstruction of justice finding
Response to saljr1 (Original post)
Wed Mar 27, 2019, 02:44 PM
at140 (5,805 posts)
2. Which court? SCOTUS??
Response to at140 (Reply #2)
Wed Mar 27, 2019, 04:55 PM
19. Need to hope that John Roberts might be centrist/reasonable
Response to at140 (Reply #2)
Wed Mar 27, 2019, 05:35 PM
Laura PourMeADrink (39,017 posts)
22. Exactly. Trump's put blocking chess pieces everywhere. But
Response to Laura PourMeADrink (Reply #22)
Wed Mar 27, 2019, 05:57 PM
at140 (5,805 posts)
26. thanks for your post...
|
I needed a good laugh today!!
 |
Response to at140 (Reply #26)
Wed Mar 27, 2019, 06:26 PM
Laura PourMeADrink (39,017 posts)
28. Think part of it is acting like trump doesn't exist.
Response to at140 (Reply #2)
Wed Mar 27, 2019, 06:06 PM
27. he was put there for the Roe vote. He's showing not to be a rubber stamp for trump
Response to saljr1 (Original post)
Wed Mar 27, 2019, 02:46 PM
RKP5637 (63,519 posts)
3. That my concern... they might edit/delete out information. Most of them are damn liars, so it could
Response to RKP5637 (Reply #3)
Wed Mar 27, 2019, 04:55 PM
FakeNoose (24,962 posts)
18. They have to redact certain things
|
Any personal info that identifies innocent individuals or otherwise non-suspects must be redacted before they can release the report. Don't forget that Mueller interviewed tons of people who hadn't been indicted or subpoenaed, and they gave important background info.
Barr should have until next Tuesday to complete his redaction, then we can throw the book at him.   |
Response to saljr1 (Original post)
Wed Mar 27, 2019, 02:47 PM
LastLiberal in PalmSprings (12,158 posts)
4. Only the president can claim executive privilege, and I'm not sure he or she can do it
Response to LastLiberal in PalmSprings (Reply #4)
Wed Mar 27, 2019, 04:04 PM
13. Executive privilege
Response to ut oh (Reply #13)
Wed Mar 27, 2019, 06:29 PM
Laura PourMeADrink (39,017 posts)
29. He can't claim exec privilege just because something
Response to saljr1 (Original post)
Wed Mar 27, 2019, 03:10 PM
Botany (64,676 posts)
6. If the report was exculpatory then it would have been released days ago but instead Barr now says...
Response to Botany (Reply #6)
Wed Mar 27, 2019, 03:51 PM
uponit7771 (86,905 posts)
9. +1, at minimum the Trump admin would've rushed to dems to set a date they can all agree on
Response to Botany (Reply #6)
Wed Mar 27, 2019, 06:32 PM
Laura PourMeADrink (39,017 posts)
30. Hmm . But trump admin said they haven't even seen it. I have
Response to Laura PourMeADrink (Reply #30)
Wed Mar 27, 2019, 06:37 PM
Botany (64,676 posts)
31. And according to down thread Fox News knows..
Response to saljr1 (Original post)
Wed Mar 27, 2019, 03:37 PM
7. I think congress should reject Barr's report straight out.
Response to saljr1 (Original post)
Wed Mar 27, 2019, 03:52 PM
10. Particularly when FOX News knows it is 700 pages long ...
Response to Jarqui (Reply #10)
Wed Mar 27, 2019, 05:37 PM
Laura PourMeADrink (39,017 posts)
23. I wanna apply for the trump reader job. I will tell hum
Response to saljr1 (Original post)
Wed Mar 27, 2019, 04:23 PM
ehrnst (32,640 posts)
15. Um... that has happened. Schiff has given them a deadline of Tuesday.
Response to saljr1 (Original post)
Wed Mar 27, 2019, 04:24 PM
paleotn (13,988 posts)
16. The report, plus Mueller himself
Response to paleotn (Reply #16)
Wed Mar 27, 2019, 04:27 PM
ehrnst (32,640 posts)
17. If Dems subpoena Mueller before the deadline for the full report
Response to saljr1 (Original post)
Wed Mar 27, 2019, 05:00 PM
20. If Barr issues a report that unnecessarily omits damaging material....
Response to saljr1 (Original post)
Wed Mar 27, 2019, 05:39 PM
Laura PourMeADrink (39,017 posts)
24. Impeach Barr
