Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

MelissaB

(16,420 posts)
Wed Apr 3, 2019, 11:50 PM Apr 2019

WP matches NYT story with *BIG details on those summaries* (Yeah, it's a BFD!)

Limited information Barr has shared about Russia investigation frustrated some on Mueller’s team

By Ellen Nakashima ,
Carol D. Leonnig and
Rosalind S. Helderman

April 3 at 11:33 PM

... snip

Some members of the office were particularly disappointed that Barr did not release summary information the special counsel team had prepared, according to two people familiar with their reactions.

“There was immediate displeasure from the team when they saw how the attorney general had characterized their work instead,” according one U.S. official briefed on the matter.

Summaries were prepared for different sections of the report, with a view that they could made public, the official said.

The report was prepared “so that the front matter from each section could have been released immediately — or very quickly,” the official said. “It was done in a way that minimum redactions, if any, would have been necessary, and the work would have spoken for itself.”

Mueller’s team assumed the information was going to be made available to the public, the official said, “and so they prepared their summaries to be shared in their own words — and not in the attorney general’s summary of their work, as turned out to be the case.”

More: https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/limited-information-barr-has-shared-about-russia-investigation-frustrated-some-on-muellers-team/2019/04/03/c98e8a02-567a-11e9-814f-e2f46684196e_story.html?utm_term=.682b67e54e6e




Edited again to say: On obstruction, check out post #4.
31 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
WP matches NYT story with *BIG details on those summaries* (Yeah, it's a BFD!) (Original Post) MelissaB Apr 2019 OP
By hook or by crook its going to come out! cspanlovr Apr 2019 #1
I agree -- this is a BFD! Blecht Apr 2019 #2
HOLY SHIT! DAMN RIGHT THIS IS A BFD! manor321 Apr 2019 #3
Oh, and about obstruction... Check out this quote: MelissaB Apr 2019 #4
Visability UTUSN Apr 2019 #13
Congress will need to get this report asap imo. triron Apr 2019 #14
obstruction of justice continues -- by Barr! Hermit-The-Prog Apr 2019 #23
Release the summaries already! Glimmer of Hope Apr 2019 #5
Except to protect tRump's ass. Grammy23 Apr 2019 #11
We don't want any stinking summaries. SergeStorms Apr 2019 #17
The summaries were written by the Special Counsel's Office Glimmer of Hope Apr 2019 #20
I'm aware of that. SergeStorms Apr 2019 #24
K&R CentralMass Apr 2019 #6
They need to ask Barr for those summaries. RDANGELO Apr 2019 #7
So presuming there is some serious shit on Trump in the report TheRealNorth Apr 2019 #8
This shows the NYT was full of shit today manor321 Apr 2019 #9
I always look to see who wrote the article at NYT. MelissaB Apr 2019 #10
If it is by Schmidt I always take it with a grain of salt. BigmanPigman Apr 2019 #15
From Carol Leonnig MelissaB Apr 2019 #12
Thanks! This needs to be front page news! Rhiannon12866 Apr 2019 #18
Yes, it sure does! suffragette Apr 2019 #26
K & R SunSeeker Apr 2019 #16
K&R DesertRat Apr 2019 #19
I hit the paywall every time. PatrickforO Apr 2019 #21
clear your cookies. mopinko Apr 2019 #25
Sounds like a case for Obstruction by Barr. Anyone want to Prosecute him? Ford_Prefect Apr 2019 #22
Unfortunately, the special counsel regulation lets him write his own summary. marylandblue Apr 2019 #28
The rules of evidence do not allow him to hide critical facts or radically interpret them Ford_Prefect Apr 2019 #31
What's keeping the sources from talking openly and in public. Kurt V. Apr 2019 #27
Prosecutors can't release unauthorized information about their cases. marylandblue Apr 2019 #29
thanks Kurt V. Apr 2019 #30

Blecht

(3,803 posts)
2. I agree -- this is a BFD!
Wed Apr 3, 2019, 11:55 PM
Apr 2019

All those assholes strutting around shouting "Exonerated!" need to be put in their place.

MelissaB

(16,420 posts)
4. Oh, and about obstruction... Check out this quote:
Wed Apr 3, 2019, 11:59 PM
Apr 2019
But members of Mueller’s team have complained to close associates that the evidence they gathered on obstruction was alarming and significant.

triron

(21,984 posts)
14. Congress will need to get this report asap imo.
Thu Apr 4, 2019, 12:41 AM
Apr 2019

Don't wait on Barr, Nadler! He is fucking with you (and us).

Hermit-The-Prog

(33,239 posts)
23. obstruction of justice continues -- by Barr!
Thu Apr 4, 2019, 03:12 AM
Apr 2019

Barr is obstructing justice with corrupt intent, i.e., to aid his 'boss' in escaping consequences of criminal acts.

Glimmer of Hope

(5,823 posts)
5. Release the summaries already!
Wed Apr 3, 2019, 11:59 PM
Apr 2019

There is no fucking excuse to keep them from the public. I am so pissed!!!!!!

Grammy23

(5,810 posts)
11. Except to protect tRump's ass.
Thu Apr 4, 2019, 12:14 AM
Apr 2019

And that has taken priority over our right to know what Mueller and his team found. It was tax payer money used to fund the investigation so we have a right to know what they discovered and what tRump did to warrant the two years of investigation. Stop protecting him and release the findings. tRump is supposedly rich. Let him hire some lawyers to defend him.

SergeStorms

(19,148 posts)
17. We don't want any stinking summaries.
Thu Apr 4, 2019, 01:33 AM
Apr 2019

We want the entire report (with redactions made by the House Intellegence Committee, and no one else) and not some Bill Barr ham-handed attempt to protect the short fingered vulgarian in the White House. Barr has very short fingers as well. I think there's some short fingered vulgarian conspiracy going on here!

Glimmer of Hope

(5,823 posts)
20. The summaries were written by the Special Counsel's Office
Thu Apr 4, 2019, 01:57 AM
Apr 2019

and were ready for the public 12 days ago when the report was submitted.

SergeStorms

(19,148 posts)
24. I'm aware of that.
Thu Apr 4, 2019, 09:11 AM
Apr 2019

I was talking about Barr's cover-up summary that he's already released, and the one he's supposedly working on now that will be ready "around the middle of April". Barr decided that he wasn't going to use the summaries provided by the special council, and would inject his own idiotic summaries that "completely exonerated" Trump.

TheRealNorth

(9,462 posts)
8. So presuming there is some serious shit on Trump in the report
Thu Apr 4, 2019, 12:07 AM
Apr 2019

Is the MSM going to ask all the Republicans on the House Intelligence Committee whether they think they should resign?

 

manor321

(3,344 posts)
9. This shows the NYT was full of shit today
Thu Apr 4, 2019, 12:10 AM
Apr 2019

While today's NYT article was very embarrassing for Barr, it also included a lot of pro-Barr propaganda. For example, the NYT said Barr couldn't release the Mueller summaries because it included information that couldn't be released. But the WashPo directly contradicts that!

Holy cow!

Just imagine if Mueller or one of his prosecutors testifies publicly to these facts! It will be dramatic!

marylandblue

(12,344 posts)
28. Unfortunately, the special counsel regulation lets him write his own summary.
Thu Apr 4, 2019, 06:23 PM
Apr 2019

But the politics are damning.

Ford_Prefect

(7,868 posts)
31. The rules of evidence do not allow him to hide critical facts or radically interpret them
Fri Apr 5, 2019, 07:07 PM
Apr 2019

so as to draw false conclusions and mis-direct application of the law. In short he may not obfuscate legal conclusions of his prosecutors. He may not omit testimony, evidence, or recommendations made by those investigating and prosecuting a crime. He may not omit or distort observations and conclusions made by a grand jury. He may make his own statement about the summarized information separate from that his investigators and prosecutors have made.

Anything else would be obstruction of justice. Which it would appear Barr has committed several times in the course of four pages, at least according to Mueller's Staff who wrote much of the 400+ pages.

Once again Trump is trying to force things to function counter to established legal process by installing someone who appears to know little of how it really works.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»WP matches NYT story with...