General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWP matches NYT story with *BIG details on those summaries* (Yeah, it's a BFD!)
By Ellen Nakashima ,
Carol D. Leonnig and
Rosalind S. Helderman
April 3 at 11:33 PM
... snip
Some members of the office were particularly disappointed that Barr did not release summary information the special counsel team had prepared, according to two people familiar with their reactions.
There was immediate displeasure from the team when they saw how the attorney general had characterized their work instead, according one U.S. official briefed on the matter.
Summaries were prepared for different sections of the report, with a view that they could made public, the official said.
The report was prepared so that the front matter from each section could have been released immediately or very quickly, the official said. It was done in a way that minimum redactions, if any, would have been necessary, and the work would have spoken for itself.
Muellers team assumed the information was going to be made available to the public, the official said, and so they prepared their summaries to be shared in their own words and not in the attorney generals summary of their work, as turned out to be the case.
More: https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/limited-information-barr-has-shared-about-russia-investigation-frustrated-some-on-muellers-team/2019/04/03/c98e8a02-567a-11e9-814f-e2f46684196e_story.html?utm_term=.682b67e54e6e
Edited again to say: On obstruction, check out post #4.
cspanlovr
(1,470 posts)Blecht
(3,803 posts)All those assholes strutting around shouting "Exonerated!" need to be put in their place.
manor321
(3,344 posts)WOW. WOW. WOW.
K&R
MelissaB
(16,420 posts)triron
(21,984 posts)Don't wait on Barr, Nadler! He is fucking with you (and us).
Hermit-The-Prog
(33,239 posts)Barr is obstructing justice with corrupt intent, i.e., to aid his 'boss' in escaping consequences of criminal acts.
Glimmer of Hope
(5,823 posts)There is no fucking excuse to keep them from the public. I am so pissed!!!!!!
Grammy23
(5,810 posts)And that has taken priority over our right to know what Mueller and his team found. It was tax payer money used to fund the investigation so we have a right to know what they discovered and what tRump did to warrant the two years of investigation. Stop protecting him and release the findings. tRump is supposedly rich. Let him hire some lawyers to defend him.
SergeStorms
(19,148 posts)We want the entire report (with redactions made by the House Intellegence Committee, and no one else) and not some Bill Barr ham-handed attempt to protect the short fingered vulgarian in the White House. Barr has very short fingers as well. I think there's some short fingered vulgarian conspiracy going on here!
Glimmer of Hope
(5,823 posts)and were ready for the public 12 days ago when the report was submitted.
SergeStorms
(19,148 posts)I was talking about Barr's cover-up summary that he's already released, and the one he's supposedly working on now that will be ready "around the middle of April". Barr decided that he wasn't going to use the summaries provided by the special council, and would inject his own idiotic summaries that "completely exonerated" Trump.
CentralMass
(15,265 posts)RDANGELO
(3,432 posts)If he doesn't turn them over, then subpoena them.
TheRealNorth
(9,462 posts)Is the MSM going to ask all the Republicans on the House Intelligence Committee whether they think they should resign?
manor321
(3,344 posts)While today's NYT article was very embarrassing for Barr, it also included a lot of pro-Barr propaganda. For example, the NYT said Barr couldn't release the Mueller summaries because it included information that couldn't be released. But the WashPo directly contradicts that!
Holy cow!
Just imagine if Mueller or one of his prosecutors testifies publicly to these facts! It will be dramatic!
MelissaB
(16,420 posts)BigmanPigman
(51,564 posts)MelissaB
(16,420 posts)Rhiannon12866
(204,690 posts)suffragette
(12,232 posts)SunSeeker
(51,504 posts)DesertRat
(27,995 posts)PatrickforO
(14,558 posts)Sigh.
mopinko
(69,982 posts)tho there are some darn tough cookies out there these days.
Ford_Prefect
(7,868 posts)marylandblue
(12,344 posts)But the politics are damning.
Ford_Prefect
(7,868 posts)so as to draw false conclusions and mis-direct application of the law. In short he may not obfuscate legal conclusions of his prosecutors. He may not omit testimony, evidence, or recommendations made by those investigating and prosecuting a crime. He may not omit or distort observations and conclusions made by a grand jury. He may make his own statement about the summarized information separate from that his investigators and prosecutors have made.
Anything else would be obstruction of justice. Which it would appear Barr has committed several times in the course of four pages, at least according to Mueller's Staff who wrote much of the 400+ pages.
Once again Trump is trying to force things to function counter to established legal process by installing someone who appears to know little of how it really works.