Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsI'm in Favor of Continued (& Aggressive) House Investigations into Trump's Many Shady Dealings
Investigations that when evidence is found, results in criminal indictments that could ultimately see him behind bars (wearing silver bracelets and an orange jumpsuit that matches his hair).
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
9 replies, 542 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (2)
ReplyReply to this post
9 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I'm in Favor of Continued (& Aggressive) House Investigations into Trump's Many Shady Dealings (Original Post)
dlk
Apr 2019
OP
Can they investigate obstructionist Congressmen and Senators while they are at it?
Generic Brad
Apr 2019
#5
+1, the KGOP didn't even ... NEED ... facts or evidence or a damn thing to have 432343 investigation
uponit7771
Apr 2019
#9
Yes, it would be neglectful not to. There is a lot of crumbs in that there report. nt
UniteFightBack
Apr 2019
#7
PeeJ52
(1,588 posts)1. ooh...ooh... me too ... me too
C_U_L8R
(44,894 posts)2. There's plenty of evidence to justify intense investigation.
Let's bring these witnesses into the sunlight of sworn public testimony.
BigmanPigman
(51,431 posts)3. Of course!
dlk
(11,435 posts)4. Open, Televised Hearings with Subpoenaed Witnesses
Generic Brad
(14,270 posts)5. Can they investigate obstructionist Congressmen and Senators while they are at it?
There are key Republican committee members and leaders whose actions sure do not pass the sniff test.
keithbvadu2
(36,367 posts)6. More investigations... as many as Benghazi
uponit7771
(90,225 posts)9. +1, the KGOP didn't even ... NEED ... facts or evidence or a damn thing to have 432343 investigation
... into a damn video about something.
We're talking about Red Don's crew obstructing the investigation into Russia interference.
UniteFightBack
(8,231 posts)7. Yes, it would be neglectful not to. There is a lot of crumbs in that there report. nt
uponit7771
(90,225 posts)8. Which will be stonewalled, Impeachment proceedings make the stonewalling at least convictable
... under OoJ charges.