Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

still_one

(92,204 posts)
Fri Apr 19, 2019, 09:33 PM Apr 2019

In my view if the House decides to implement articles of impeachment, it would be better if it was

after Mueller testifies before Congress.

While it is almost certain that Senate will not vote to convict, the argument for impeachment, regardless whether the Senate convicts or not, is it puts everyone on record in Congress where they stand on damning evidence in the Mueller report.

Mueller made it clear in the report that he will not indict Trump because he believes a sitting President cannot be indicted. However, he also made it clear that after a president leaves office, he absolutely can be indicted.

He refused to exonerate trump, and left it up to Congress to decide if he should be removed from office.

If somehow impeachment and conviction did happen, I wouldn't be surprised if Pence pardoned trump, as Ford pardoned Nixon.

Because of the Mueller report, I believe the House must introduce articles of impeachment, whether it is successful or not, it will put everyone on the record, and let the chips fall where they may




14 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

still_one

(92,204 posts)
3. It won't be before the House gets back before recess, but neither would impeachment occur before
Fri Apr 19, 2019, 09:44 PM
Apr 2019

then either, but they should do it with upmost haste while it is fresh in everyone's mind

I also said that would be ideal, but I also believe he could be called during impeachment hearings themselves


pangaia

(24,324 posts)
2. Maybe we can get some really good dirt on enough 'possible' swing senators
Fri Apr 19, 2019, 09:42 PM
Apr 2019

or ANY senators,

to encourage them to vote to convict..

Like maybe susan collins wears a wig and is really bald,
or ted cruz was once caught... I dunno doin' something

heh, heh, heh..

still_one

(92,204 posts)
5. I think it is a pretty high threshold to get 2/3, though if enough republicans up for reelection
Fri Apr 19, 2019, 09:46 PM
Apr 2019

believe this could hurt them in 2020, they might just vote to convict

jcgoldie

(11,631 posts)
6. And if it sways public opinion and helps get Trump another 4 years?
Fri Apr 19, 2019, 09:46 PM
Apr 2019

...to run out the statute of limitations on all the crimes detailed in the investigation? Then what? I just don't understand "impeachment because its our duty" argument. Its our duty to do everything possible to make sure Trump is not president for another 4 years.

still_one

(92,204 posts)
8. I understand your position, and I was tending toward that position, until I gave it some thought
Fri Apr 19, 2019, 09:56 PM
Apr 2019

The facts from the Mueller report is we have a President who tried to obstruct justice. There are 10 instances of that cited in the report.

Going through the process of impeachment not only will acknowledge that, but will put people on the record if they believe that obstructing justice is ok, and I think that is important. Doing nothing will setup a dangerous precedent, that obstruction of justice is not an impeachable offense, and that in my view is not good





Karadeniz

(22,526 posts)
7. Sched. May 23, so far. There are benefits to having all
Fri Apr 19, 2019, 09:49 PM
Apr 2019

The televised hearings. The Gop base is largely uninformed, but they may tune in if the interrogators can keep interest up. Then the base might absorb some reality.

Optimistically yours,
Kara

still_one

(92,204 posts)
9. For me it is beyond the "politics" of the situation. It is the House stating clearly that
Fri Apr 19, 2019, 09:58 PM
Apr 2019

obstruction of justice isprecedent an impeachable offense, and undermines our democracy


Karadeniz

(22,526 posts)
14. I agtee. I've said so many times in impeachment discussions. The public hearings may or may not
Sat Apr 20, 2019, 12:11 AM
Apr 2019

Lead to formal impeachment. Joyce Wine Bank, just on Eleventh Hour, swears by the importance of public hearings. She was there for the whole Watergate process.

defacto7

(13,485 posts)
10. It seems to me some people are in a big hurry to get tRump pardoned.
Fri Apr 19, 2019, 10:09 PM
Apr 2019

Impeachment and conviction equals Pence.

Pence equals pardon.

If he's voted out then he gets an indictment the first day he walks out of the WH.

Which do we want?

still_one

(92,204 posts)
12. Yes, if impeachment and conviction happen, there is a good possibility he would be pardoned by Pence
Fri Apr 19, 2019, 11:16 PM
Apr 2019

However, the message would be loud and clear that a president should not obstruct justice, and is not above the law

Whether impeachment and conviction are successful or not, people will be on the record whether they believe a President is above the law




Latest Discussions»General Discussion»In my view if the House d...