Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

WiffenPoof

(2,404 posts)
Sat Apr 20, 2019, 08:14 AM Apr 2019

So...It Seems Clear To Me

It has been repeated over and over that there is no finding of collusion between Trump and the Russians. However, it seems clear that there are numerous examples of obstruction of justice.

So, if there was no collusion between Trump and the Russians, what's with all the obstructions? What exactly was the obstructive behavior suppose to hide?

Collusion.

ON EDIT: Sorry if I'm starting the obvious.

7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

vlyons

(10,252 posts)
1. The money, of course
Sat Apr 20, 2019, 08:21 AM
Apr 2019

Mueller did not follow the money. He did not investigate how much Russian money flowed into the Trump campaign, Trump businesses, the NRA, and god only knows what else.

brush

(53,784 posts)
2. Agreed. trump colluded on nat'l TV with the "Russia if you're listening..." request. And stupid Jr..
Sat Apr 20, 2019, 08:35 AM
Apr 2019

colluded as well with the trump tower "get Hillary dirt" meeting with the Russkies.

Also the report mentions that the crooks in the admin destroyed tons of evidence by deleting emails and communicating through encrypted messages—they're just a huge cabal of crooks and liars. We really have to impeach, but IMO we have to follow through with the subpoenas and public hearings to build a case for it as info and testimony will come out that shifts the onus totally onto the repugs in the Senate to act on the corruption, obstruction, endless lies and crookedness so blatantly in our faces coming from the trump WH.

Building a case for it is IMO the wiser way to do it instead of immediately jumping to impeachment. We have to let all the corruption and unfitness for office of trump to settle in into the consciousness of the country.

vlyons

(10,252 posts)
3. not a problem for me
Sat Apr 20, 2019, 08:43 AM
Apr 2019

I am so stressed in my personal life right now, that I can't get too emotionally invested in how the Trump saga unfolds. But unfold it will. The country needs to hear the testimony of the various players, whom Congress will subpoena. I am a deep believer in the truth of karma, which is like gravity in that it never stops working. We have elected honest, competent, careful, and thoughtful representatives. They are in charge of much of how the Trump saga unfolds.

WiffenPoof

(2,404 posts)
4. Well Stated
Sat Apr 20, 2019, 08:49 AM
Apr 2019

I also believe that we need to impeach. Failing to do so would send the wrong message.

However,. I would like to see the Congress pursue their agenda aggressively at the same time. For example, they should design and develop an infrastructure bill and push it very hard. This would send the important message that Congress is pursuing the people's business. An infrastructure bill would be difficult for the Republicans to align against.

brush

(53,784 posts)
6. Yes, even the repugs can't come out against wholesale infrastructure improvements and the jobs...
Sat Apr 20, 2019, 08:53 AM
Apr 2019

that would create.

empedocles

(15,751 posts)
5. Agreed. 'Building a case' with the coming tidal waves of corruption information,
Sat Apr 20, 2019, 08:51 AM
Apr 2019

is the wiser way to do it, instead of immediately jumping to impeachment.

abqtommy

(14,118 posts)
7. Can we stop using the word "collusion"?
Sat Apr 20, 2019, 09:46 AM
Apr 2019

It's not a legal term. The term of choice is "conspiracy" which is appropriate and fitting in all tRump/Republicon matters.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»So...It Seems Clear To Me