Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Collusion In Plain Sight
Last edited Sat Apr 20, 2019, 02:33 PM - Edit history (1)
Let’s do a Barr type summary on one of the main conclusions.
“[T]he investigation established that the Russian government perceived it would benefit from a Trump presidency and worked to secure that outcome, and that the Campaign EXPECTED IT WOULD BENEFIT ELECTORALLY FROM INFORMATION STOLEN AND RELEASED THROUGH RUSSIAN EFFORTS”
That leaves off the ‘although’ and the main clause. But if you just look at that sentence wouldn’t you conclude “Collusion! Collusion” rather than “No Collusion!”
1 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
= new reply since forum marked as read
