Unless otherwise demonstrated, WE SHOULD ASSUME THAT BARR IS DOING THIS FOR
PURPOSES OF OBSTRUCTION. Why should he or any of these guys be given the benefit of the doubt at this point, when they've already shown us exactly who they are? How does this benefit the American people, national security, and the search for truth?
Same as for Trump...after 8000 lies in two years, why is anything that comes out of his mouth assumed to be true unless otherwise shown, when it should be automatically taken as another lie?
Assume the worst and we'll be closer to the truth.
Kick in to the DU tip jar?
This week we're running a special pop-up mini fund drive. From Monday through Friday we're going ad-free for all registered members, and we're asking you to kick in to the DU tip jar to support the site and keep us financially healthy.
As a bonus, making a contribution will allow you to leave kudos for another DU member, and at the end of the week we'll recognize the DUers who you think make this community great.