General Discussion

NewJeffCT

(56,848 posts) Wed May 1, 2019, 02:07 PM May 2019

Great point from Asha Rangappa

I'll post a link to her tweet when I get the chance...

"Can someone ask Barr whether the fact that DOJ did not charge HRC means that she was "falsely accused" and therefore could have freely obstructed justice?"

Click here to purchase valentine hearts!

4 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Great point from Asha Rangappa (Original Post) NewJeffCT May 2019 OP

logically, that's a great argument. practically, asking it would only encourage them to indict her. unblock May 2019 #1

well, they currently have several investigations into Clinton NewJeffCT May 2019 #4

Here is her tweet NewJeffCT May 2019 #2

a bit more NewJeffCT May 2019 #3

unblock

(56,081 posts)

1. logically, that's a great argument. practically, asking it would only encourage them to indict her.

Reply to NewJeffCT (Original post)

Wed May 1, 2019, 02:15 PM

May 2019

then again, they'll probably indict her anyway....

Click here to purchase valentine hearts!

NewJeffCT

(56,848 posts)

4. well, they currently have several investigations into Clinton

Reply to unblock (Reply #1)

Wed May 1, 2019, 02:45 PM

May 2019

and her emails and Uranium One...

Click here to purchase valentine hearts!

NewJeffCT

(56,848 posts)

2. Here is her tweet

Reply to NewJeffCT (Original post)

Wed May 1, 2019, 02:18 PM

May 2019

Link to tweet

Click here to purchase valentine hearts!

NewJeffCT

(56,848 posts)

3. a bit more

Reply to NewJeffCT (Reply #2)

Wed May 1, 2019, 02:19 PM

May 2019

Link to tweet

Click here to purchase valentine hearts!

Reply to this discussion