Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsFox News legal analyst says Barr 'probably misled' lawmakers in prior testimony on Mueller report
Link to tweet
Fox News legal analyst Andrew Napolitano said Wednesday that Attorney General William Barr "probably misled" the House during his April testimony about Robert Mueller's report, pointing to evidence that Barr mischaracterized the special counsel's opinion of his handling of the case.
"Hes got a problem in my view," Napolitano said on Fox News as Barr testified before the Senate Judiciary Committee.
Napolitano added that he doesn't think Barr told a "lie," but that he "probably misled" the lower chamber when he testified on April 9 about whether there were "objections to the tone and tenor and content" of his initial summary about Mueller's findings.
Barr said at the time that he didn't know where media reports were coming from that said Mueller's team had qualms with his characterization of their report.
But The Washington Post first reported Tuesday night that Mueller sent a letter to Barr on March 27 criticizing how the attorney general summarized the investigation's findings. Mueller expressed frustration that the letter "did not fully capture the context, nature, and substance of this Office's work and conclusions."
Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.) on Wednesday accused Barr of "purposely misleading" House members.
"Hes got a problem in my view," Napolitano said on Fox News as Barr testified before the Senate Judiciary Committee.
Napolitano added that he doesn't think Barr told a "lie," but that he "probably misled" the lower chamber when he testified on April 9 about whether there were "objections to the tone and tenor and content" of his initial summary about Mueller's findings.
Barr said at the time that he didn't know where media reports were coming from that said Mueller's team had qualms with his characterization of their report.
But The Washington Post first reported Tuesday night that Mueller sent a letter to Barr on March 27 criticizing how the attorney general summarized the investigation's findings. Mueller expressed frustration that the letter "did not fully capture the context, nature, and substance of this Office's work and conclusions."
Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.) on Wednesday accused Barr of "purposely misleading" House members.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 668 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (8)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Fox News legal analyst says Barr 'probably misled' lawmakers in prior testimony on Mueller report (Original Post)
hlthe2b
May 2019
OP
The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,930 posts)1. How long before Fox sacks Napolitano?
spanone
(135,919 posts)2. 'probably'?
gratuitous
(82,849 posts)3. They sure pussy-foot around, don't they?
"Probably misled." Really? "Probably misled"? So circumspect! But they're a fair-minded bunch at Fox. They wouldn't go as far as that wild-eyed radical Patrick Leahy who characterized Barr's statement as "purposely misleading."
hlthe2b
(102,477 posts)4. and, Fox News' Chris Wallace