General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsBill Barr's theory of executive power puts presidents above the law
Adam Serwer
Staff writer at The Atlantic
One of the stranger aspects of the Donald Trump era is the open competition for the presidents affection. From Fox Businesss Lou Dobbs saying that Trumps presidency is the most accomplished
in modern history to the president forcing his Cabinet secretaries to praise him on camera to his former fixer Michael Cohen once declaring that he would take a bullet for his former employer, it seems like each of the presidents myrmidons is daily attempting to outdo the others in employing Soviet-style hyperbole in praise of the president.
If theres a comfort in this spectacle, its in the recognition that this is performance, that its a schtick, and that its ubiquity is a marker of the presidents deep insecurity. It is not a projection of strength, but one of weakness. The performativity of the spectacle suggests that at least some of these people recognize they are doing a bit. Others seem to have been corrupted by their proximity to Trump. Career civil servants such as Rod Rosenstein, who swore oaths to uphold the Constitution, have somehow been reduced to shuddering with fear at the thought of being fired in a tweet, begging the president for the opportunity to ensure that the law bends to his will.
William Barr, the attorney general of the United States, is something else entirely. Barr is no flunky. He is a hardened ideologue who believes that the president he serves is largely above the law. Barr seems genuinely committed to defending the imperial prerogatives of the office against shortsighted liberals who would weaken the presidency in a delusional quest to remove a Republican from office. As he put it in his 2017 memo attacking the special counsels investigation, crediting the belief that the president could have committed obstruction by his official acts would have grave consequences far beyond the immediate confines of this case and would do lasting damage to the Presidency and to the administration of law within the Executive branch.
Barr is not protecting Trump because he thinks Trump is the most accomplished president in modern history, because he fears Trump, because the real-estate mogul has some psychological hold on him, or because he has been corrupted. Barr is defending Trump because Barr is a zealot ...
https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2019/05/bill-barr-is-a-fanatic/588580/
The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,587 posts)"Barr is not Cohen. He is not doing a bit. He is not grifting. He is not performing. He is not a suck-up, or an opportunist, or a lackey. He has not been compromised or corrupted. He is an ideologue who, like many of his Republican predecessors, believes that Republican presidents can do whatever they want, regardless of what Congress, the law, or the Constitution says. And that makes him far more dangerous."
In the case of many other WH officials, Trump did eat their souls (Exhibit A: Rod Rosenstein). But Barr never had one to begin with.