Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

kentuck

(111,089 posts)
Fri May 10, 2019, 10:13 AM May 2019

Vol. II, Page 86 and 87. Mueller Report

When the President called McGahn a second time to follow up on the order to call the Department of Justice, McGahn recalled that the President was more direct, saying something like, "Call Rod, tell Rod that Mueller has conflicts and can't be the Special Counsel."581 McGahn recalled the President telling him "Mueller has to go" and "Call me back when you do it."582 McGahn understood the President to be saying that the Special Counsel had to be removed by Rosenstein.583 To end the conversation with the President, McGahn left the President with the impression that McGahn would call Rosenstein.584 McGahn recalled that he had already said no to the President's request and he was worn down, so he just wanted to get off the phone.585 McGahn recalled feeling trapped because he did not plan to follow the President's directive but did not know what he would say the next time the President called.586 McGahn decided he had to resign.587 He called his personal lawyer and then called his chief of staff, Annie Donaldson, to inform her of his decision.588 He then drove to the office to pack his belongings and submit his resignation letter.589 Donaldson recalled that McGahn told her the President had called and demanded he contact the Department of Justice and that the President wanted him to do something that McGahn did not want to do.590 McGahn told Donaldson that the President had called at least twice and in one of the calls asked "have you done it?"591 McGahn did not tell Donaldson the specifics of the President's request because he was consciously trying not to involve her in the investigation, but Donaldson inferred that the President's directive was related to the Russia investigation.592 Donaldson prepared to resign along with McGahn.593 That evening, McGahn called both Priebus and Bannon and told them that he intended to resign.594 McGahn recalled that, after speaking with his attorney and given the nature of the President' s request, he decided not to share details of the President's request with other White House staff.595 Priebus recalled that McGahn said that the President had asked him to " do crazy shit," but he thought McGahn did not tell him the specifics of the President' s request because McGahn was trying to protect Priebus from what he did not need to know.596 Priebus and Bannon both urged McGahn not to quit, and McGahn ultimately returned to work that Monday and remained in his position.597 He had not told the President directly that he planned to resign, and when they next saw each other the President did not ask McGahn whether he had followed through with calling Rosenstein.598 Around the same time, Chris Christie recalled a telephone_call with the President in which the President asked what Christie thought about the President firing the Special Counsel.599 Christie advised against doing so because there was no substantive basis for the President to fire the Special Counsel, and because the President would lose support from Republicans in Congress 600 if he did so.

13 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Vol. II, Page 86 and 87. Mueller Report (Original Post) kentuck May 2019 OP
M$Greedia is playing games malaise May 2019 #1
reads like a novel. dixiegrrrrl May 2019 #5
Enjoy malaise May 2019 #6
"M$Greedia" is meaningless. maxsolomon May 2019 #7
The sad truth is they are all a mixed bag malaise May 2019 #10
To me, NBC is more that than, say, the NYT. maxsolomon May 2019 #12
I hear you loud and clear malaise May 2019 #13
That's one set of great moments. The Lewandowski story is even crazier. manor321 May 2019 #2
These convos took place in June of 2017 FakeNoose May 2019 #3
A bunch of them lied, though. 2naSalit May 2019 #4
Recommended. H2O Man May 2019 #8
It reads like a movie script lunatica May 2019 #9
K & R Duppers May 2019 #11

malaise

(268,968 posts)
1. M$Greedia is playing games
Fri May 10, 2019, 10:15 AM
May 2019

We know this is clear OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE

ITTMF!!
Get thee to the greatest page

malaise

(268,968 posts)
10. The sad truth is they are all a mixed bag
Fri May 10, 2019, 04:22 PM
May 2019

They all want the advertising money and have lots of 'bothsideism'. All have folks who would sell their mother for that high profile position. And all have genuine investigative folks/professionals who present objective data based reports.
What I'd love to see is a survey on what the word professional means to the media houses/corporations and indeed folks in other spheres.

I'm not sure the meaning of professional that my generation bought is the same as what prevails in today's media houses/corporations and in other spheres.
Tangentally, I am sure Smokey Eyes Sanders and DisBarr think they are professionals.
Honesty and integrity were once associated with that word. It wasn't just merely certification.

Staying employed for big bucks and or a particular ideological agenda encourages hacks in all spheres.

Additionally what percentage of folks are happy with opinion rather than facts? M$Greedia is made up of businesses that cater to as many customers as possible.
And if you think the wealthy owners don't tag team for their 'special interests', think again.
M$Greedia is the corporate media model.

maxsolomon

(33,327 posts)
12. To me, NBC is more that than, say, the NYT.
Fri May 10, 2019, 06:30 PM
May 2019

NBC embraced Megan Kelly, gave Mark Burnett a platform to normalize President Sociopath.

But as a NYT subscriber, I don't see them legitimizing "bothsidesism". they have a carefully crafted voice that withholds judgment, but you can hear their eyes rolling back in their heads if you know how to listen.

And yes, I remember the run up to the Iraq War.

malaise

(268,968 posts)
13. I hear you loud and clear
Fri May 10, 2019, 07:17 PM
May 2019

but like you I remember the NYT and the run up to the Iraq war and their are pro Con hacks there too.

FakeNoose

(32,634 posts)
3. These convos took place in June of 2017
Fri May 10, 2019, 10:57 AM
May 2019

... only a few weeks after Mueller was hired as Special Investigator. However McGahn didn't resign then, stayed on staff and testified to Mueller for 30 hours in 2018. For a time Chump's lawyers convinced him to cooperate with the investigation and allow McGahn to talk, in hopes (I guess) that it would keep the focus off Chump.

During all that time, executive privilege was never invoked, and pretty much every staffer cooperated when asked to testify to Mueller. When did executive privilege finally become an issue? When Bill Barr became Attorney General.

H2O Man

(73,537 posts)
8. Recommended.
Fri May 10, 2019, 04:09 PM
May 2019

My son got us each a copy of the book, so that we can use highlighters on certain sections. You've nailed one of them here.

I can't put the book down. I keep re-reading sections of it.

lunatica

(53,410 posts)
9. It reads like a movie script
Fri May 10, 2019, 04:18 PM
May 2019

I suspect the report will be perused thoroughly by the script writers. All we have to bring is popcorn!

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Vol. II, Page 86 and 87. ...