Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

ETStevens

(77 posts)
Wed May 15, 2019, 09:02 PM May 2019

How many voters would be so upset by impeachment that it would convince them to vote FOR Trump?

The answer is people who were never going to vote for a Democrat anyway!

I have struggled with the impeachment dilemma because the Republicans and Fox can message and spin so well and somehow Trump will be the "victim".

However, we are on a perilous course with Trump blatantly defying the law everyday and we can no be afraid of impeaching the president for high crimes and misdemeanors.

It seems to me that televised impeachment proceedings will show well over 20 impeachable offensives and even without a conviction, you will put several hypocritical Republican Senators on the defensive, having to explain why they only support impeachment charges for a Democrat leading into an election year. Democrats in the House could be so good at presenting a compelling case to the American people that will help cause a major Blue Wave in 2020.

I now say we need to Go For It!

33 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
How many voters would be so upset by impeachment that it would convince them to vote FOR Trump? (Original Post) ETStevens May 2019 OP
Tough to tell, but I return to the Sinclair Lewis story of Elmer Gantry. no_hypocrisy May 2019 #1
Great Analogy! ETStevens May 2019 #2
No argument from me on that point. no_hypocrisy May 2019 #3
are you looking for a skirmish win? WhiteTara May 2019 #7
If no impeachment hearings Midnightwalk May 2019 #4
Dems know what they are doing. Iliyah May 2019 #5
What is the right way? ETStevens May 2019 #6
Democrats have selected their House Leadership on the basis of her ehrnst May 2019 #17
Let him do whatever he wants, until we don't have a democracy anymore? coti May 2019 #12
The party of the impeached has never fared well in elections post impeachment uponit7771 May 2019 #8
As I've pointed out to you before, every POTUS that has been impeached was in their second term ehrnst May 2019 #16
lol ... sup e !!, As I've pointed out to you in COUNTER Americans don't mind third terms. uponit7771 May 2019 #18
So why are they so rare? ehrnst May 2019 #20
Because good administrations are rare, you really don't like your world challenged do you? :grin: uponit7771 May 2019 #22
Nice evasion of the question.... when you have nothing. ehrnst May 2019 #23
Direct... EMPIRICAL... answer to direct question. 3 admins would've been 3 termers in my lifetime uponit7771 May 2019 #24
You are prickly today. ehrnst May 2019 #25
Naw man, just factual and of course there's bias ... but good admins overcome them and have uponit7771 May 2019 #27
Well, facts are likely very different in that alternate universe ehrnst May 2019 #29
Your article doesn't factor in the Russians helping Red Don uponit7771 May 2019 #30
Because the article was written before the election. It does explain the ehrnst May 2019 #31
Then its irrelevant, you got any relevant empirical information to counter my position that ... uponit7771 May 2019 #32
So Trump gets to keep breaking the law without consequences? ETStevens May 2019 #9
Can you post a link to the WAPO article? ehrnst May 2019 #21
It's not about changing anyones minds fescuerescue May 2019 #10
go for it larwdem May 2019 #11
I would advise to wait for Mueller to testify, and... Lock him up. May 2019 #13
Zero effectively. Voltaire2 May 2019 #14
Impeachment would serve to illuminate treason. Kid Berwyn May 2019 #15
ZERO. ElementaryPenguin May 2019 #19
You really have it out for Pelosi, don't you? ehrnst May 2019 #26
none Skittles May 2019 #28
Donald J. Trump deserves the indignity of impeachment BlueWI May 2019 #33

no_hypocrisy

(54,603 posts)
1. Tough to tell, but I return to the Sinclair Lewis story of Elmer Gantry.
Wed May 15, 2019, 09:07 PM
May 2019

(Spoiler Alert): At the end of the 450+ page book, Elmer has been seriously outed for his sins and travesties and crimes. And the congregation welcomes him back with opened arms collectively.

There is no hope in America, whether it's the 1920's or nearly a century later.

no_hypocrisy

(54,603 posts)
3. No argument from me on that point.
Wed May 15, 2019, 09:10 PM
May 2019

I also believe these true believers *might* stay home rather than vote for a Democrat.

WhiteTara

(31,230 posts)
7. are you looking for a skirmish win?
Wed May 15, 2019, 09:57 PM
May 2019

or to win the whole game? We are all going to die and now with 416 ppm CO2, it's a matter of time anyway. But with republicons taking over the narrative on Fox? The hearing will be botted off the air. No,
this is almost like the hare and the tortoise fable.

Midnightwalk

(3,131 posts)
4. If no impeachment hearings
Wed May 15, 2019, 09:32 PM
May 2019

Trump will say he was exonerated so bigly that “Even the Democrats knew they had nothing “

Let the hearings take appropriate time so that there are daily news reports and scandal. Not purposely or too slow or too many will permanently tune out.

The fight over getting the full report, the subpoena and the claims that the executive branch has exonerated itself are historic. We have to win.

 

ehrnst

(32,640 posts)
17. Democrats have selected their House Leadership on the basis of her
Thu May 16, 2019, 09:41 AM
May 2019

experience, smarts and skill.

Who do you think has the most tools to decide what the "right way" is?

You?

coti

(4,625 posts)
12. Let him do whatever he wants, until we don't have a democracy anymore?
Wed May 15, 2019, 11:09 PM
May 2019

Doesn't sound like a great plan to me.

 

ehrnst

(32,640 posts)
16. As I've pointed out to you before, every POTUS that has been impeached was in their second term
Thu May 16, 2019, 09:39 AM
May 2019

and statistically, it's unlikely to keep the WH in the party for more than two consecutive terms.

Not the case with Trump, is it?

uponit7771

(93,505 posts)
24. Direct... EMPIRICAL... answer to direct question. 3 admins would've been 3 termers in my lifetime
Thu May 16, 2019, 10:46 AM
May 2019

... if it weren't for impeachment or recorded cheating by the Russians.

When you have your world challenged by the facts call the facts nothing hunh?

Doesn't work

 

ehrnst

(32,640 posts)
25. You are prickly today.
Thu May 16, 2019, 10:51 AM
May 2019

And full of parallel universe, alternate reality scenarios.

If you think that the bias against a Party being a third termer in the WH didn't play into any of those scenarios, your world is the one challenged by the facts.



uponit7771

(93,505 posts)
27. Naw man, just factual and of course there's bias ... but good admins overcome them and have
Thu May 16, 2019, 10:52 AM
May 2019

... 3 times in my lifetime save recorded cheating and impeachment.

So no, your position on 3rd terms doesn't sound grounded relative to the facts that we both agree on.

 

ehrnst

(32,640 posts)
29. Well, facts are likely very different in that alternate universe
Thu May 16, 2019, 10:58 AM
May 2019

where people "don't mind" third terms so I don't imagine that we would agree on them.

Are there mosquitos there? I hate mosquitos.

https://constitutioncenter.org/blog/historic-re-election-pattern-doesnt-favor-democrats-in-2016

 

ehrnst

(32,640 posts)
31. Because the article was written before the election. It does explain the
Thu May 16, 2019, 11:05 AM
May 2019

third term hurdle, which is what I was talking about.

Did you read it?

uponit7771

(93,505 posts)
32. Then its irrelevant, you got any relevant empirical information to counter my position that ...
Thu May 16, 2019, 11:07 AM
May 2019

... impeachment doesn't fare well for the party of the impeached other than anti 3rd term bias?

tia

 

ETStevens

(77 posts)
9. So Trump gets to keep breaking the law without consequences?
Wed May 15, 2019, 10:26 PM
May 2019

According to the Washington Post tonight, Speaker Pelosi is calling on Democrats to fall in line on no impeachment.

Unprovoked War with Iran? No impeachment.

Rejecting Congress as a coequal branch of government? No impeachment.

Keep profiting off the presidency? No Impeachment.

Investigate the Investigators? No Impeachment

And no game plan to counter election hacking or voter suppression for 2020.

BRILLIANT!


 

ehrnst

(32,640 posts)
21. Can you post a link to the WAPO article?
Thu May 16, 2019, 10:37 AM
May 2019

And could you also explain your qualifications to keyboard quarterback with these "OMG the sky is falling because PELOSI!" posts?

fescuerescue

(4,475 posts)
10. It's not about changing anyones minds
Wed May 15, 2019, 10:55 PM
May 2019

Trump supporters will never decide to NOT support Trump over impeachment. NO-ONE is changing their minds. The entire nation made their decision about Trump in 2016 and the avalanche of facts since then has only reinforced every ones opinion (pro or con)

Democratic supporters will never decide to support Trump because he wasn't impeached, or because he was. It's *ALL* about what does impeachment do to voter turnout on both the left and right.

Will it enrage Trump voters so that they crash the polls? Or will they become apathetic and not show up? Same for Dems.

It's about voter turnout and which side will get the 1 to 4% bumo that is necessary to win.

larwdem

(905 posts)
11. go for it
Wed May 15, 2019, 11:01 PM
May 2019

No impeachment trump wins. hang impeached tag on his ass the same way they did to Clinton.
forever known as impeached by the house.

Lock him up.

(9,567 posts)
13. I would advise to wait for Mueller to testify, and...
Thu May 16, 2019, 01:47 AM
May 2019

maybe his staff too, after he will be done with what he has to finish and left the DOJ.

That would get enough attention, even if a few weeks before November 3.

The orange menace will not attack Iran if Putin doesn't want him to.

Kid Berwyn

(23,733 posts)
15. Impeachment would serve to illuminate treason.
Thu May 16, 2019, 09:06 AM
May 2019

Hearings would make it plain to see that Trump works for Putin.

I don’t understand how that would help the Bankrupt Unstable Moron politically.

And if the Senate won’t convict, at least his supporters’ names will live in infamy as co-traitors.

BlueWI

(1,736 posts)
33. Donald J. Trump deserves the indignity of impeachment
Thu May 16, 2019, 08:55 PM
May 2019

and his presidency is a threat to democracy.

2020 is a pivotal election either way.

Every tool in the shed is needed, including impeachment.

I respect the role of experience in leadership, but sometimes, it's possible to miss the signs of changing conditions if you're the leader of a large organization. Democratic leadership in the House has viewed impeachment as too difficult and divisive, but they are realizing now that the Senate and President do not respect rule of law enough to even pretend to cooperate. And the factionalizing of the national population and the media has gone too far already.

We'll see what happens. 2020 is a must win, impeachment or not.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»How many voters would be ...